http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 주제어 : American-Russian Rivalry (검색결과 2 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
코리아 패싱: 시어도어 루즈벨트 정부의 한국문제 불개입 정책
허남성 육군사관학교 화랑대연구소 2019 한국군사학논집 Vol.75 No.1
Some people say that today’s international and security situations surrounding the Korean Peninsula are much similar to the situations at the turn of the century from the 19th to the 20th. Many are saying the words like ‘power politics,’ ‘balance of power,’ ‘off-shore balance,’ and even ‘the passing of Korea.’ At the turn of the century from the 19th to the 20th, Korea became a ‘scapegoat’ because of her geo-political location. Despite the Korean-American Treaty of 1882, the Roosevelt Administration never intervened to prohibit Japan from encroaching on Korea. Why? This short paper examines the reasons and the backgrounds of the American non-intervention at the time. Author’s arguments here shall be based largely on the original sources, such as Theodore Roosevelt’s letters. He was a vigorous letter-writer. Therefore, this paper will reconstruct from his words his views, motives, and estimates of the situation at the time. TR asserted that no opportunity for intervention occurred during his presidency. TR even expressed that he was thoroughly pleased with the Japanese victory over Russia, for “Japan is playing our game.” However, Pro-Japanese and anti-Russian inclination itself could not be the real reason why TR encouraged Japan’s annexation of Korea. Rather, TR did it for America’s own interest. TR of course considered the overgrowth of Japanese power would be hazardous not only to the safety of the Philippines, but also to the balance of power in the Far East and to his ‘open door’ policy in Manchuria. This was his concept of the balance of power.
-
한국 따돌리기(The Passing of Korea): 시어도어 루스벨트 행정부의 한국 불개입 정책 평가
허남성 ( Heo Namseong ) 한국군사학회 2023 군사논단 Vol.115 No.-
Some people say that today’s international and security situations surrounding the Korean Peninsula are much similar to die situations at the turn of the century from the 19th to the 2001. Many are saying the words like ‘power politics,’ balance of power,’ ‘off-shore balance,’ and even ‘the passing of Korea,’ At the turn of the century from the 19th to the 20th,Korea became a ‘scapegoat’ because of her geo-political location. Despite the Korean-American Treaty of 1882, the Theodore Roosevelt Administration never intervened to prohibit Japan from encroaching on Korea. Why? This short paper examines the reasons and the backgrounds of the American non intervention at the time. Author’s arguments here shall be based largely on the original sources, such as Theodore Roosevelt’s letters. He was a vigorous letter-writer. Therefore, this paper will reconstruct from his words his views, motives, and estimates of the situation at the time. TR asserted that no opportunity for intervention occurred during his presidency. TR even expressed that he was thoroughly pleased with the Japanese victory over Russia, for “Japan is playing our game.” However, Pro-Japanese and anti-Russian inclination itself could not be the real reason why TR encouraged Japan’s annexation of Korea. Rather, TR did it for America’s own interest. TR of course considered the overgrowth of Japanese power would be hazardous not only to the safety of the Philippines, but also to the balance of power in the Far East and to his ‘open door’ policy in Manchuria. This was his concept of the balance of power.
DBpia
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
