http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
임우섭 ( Woo Sup Lim ),김진욱 ( Jin Wook Kim ) 중앙대학교 문화미디어엔터테인먼트법연구소 2012 문화.미디어.엔터테인먼트 법 Vol.6 No.1
Lawsuits involving claims of music plagiarism have proliferated in recent years. Although there were many cases on plagiarism or substantial similarity in musical works recently, only several judicial decisions in South Korea were reported. In order to prove music plagiarism, a plaintiff must demonstrate: (1) the originality of his or her complaining work, (2) access of defendant to complaining work, (3) substantive similarity between two works. In Korea, there are some cases dealing with music plagiarism. And in generally, the point of view of Korean Court is resonable. But there are some point at issue. First of all, it is not clear where burden of proof in originality and access is on. As a general rule, a plaintiff must have burden of proof in originality and access, but in many cases, it is duty of defendant. Secondly, it is hard for defendant to prove independent creation. Finally, when estimating damage of plaintiff, Korean court does not considerate the importance of plagiarized part.