http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 주제어 : 『나 자신의 노래』 (검색결과 5 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
예이츠의 「자기와 영혼의 대화」 와 휘트먼의 「나자신의 노래」 비교연구: 『환상록』을 중심으로
김영희 한국예이츠학회 2020 한국예이츠 저널 Vol.62 No.-
예이츠는 「자기와 영혼의 대화」에서 연인에 대한 영원한 사랑을 추구한 다. 반면 휘트먼은 「나자신의 노래」에서 신과 인류에 대한 원대한 사랑을 약속한다. 본 논문은 예이츠의 『환상록』을 중심으로, 2장. 상징의 완성의 네 원리와 3장. 영혼의 심판의 영의 사후 상태를 전통적인 신비주의 체험과정을 통하여 비교하였다. 그리고 이를 영/영혼과 다이몬, 정념체와 천상체, 제13원추와 서로 연관되도록 정리하였다. 달의 28상에서 대립상적 성향의 17상 예이츠와 기본상적 성향의 6상 휘트먼의 세계관은 상이하다. 하지만 두 시인은 서정 시인의 창조력, 신념처럼 ‘궁극적 본질을 완성하는 삶’으로 우리를 이끈다. Yeats pursues the eternal love for his lover in “A Dialogue of Self and Soul”. However, Whitman promises the great love for God and man in “Song of Myself.” This paper compares the four principles of “Chapter 2 Symbolic Completion” and the state after the death of the spirit in “Chapter 3 Judgment of the Soul” with the process of mysticism experience, focusing on Yeats’s A Vision where the Four Faculties and the Four Principles of spirit/soul and daimon, the passionate body and the celestial body, and Thirteenth Cone were arranged to be related. We analyzed the vision of Yeats in Phase 17 the antithetical and the vision of Whitman in Phase 6 the primary in the 28 phases of the moon. In the end, They are leading us toward “a life that fulfills the ultimate reality” such as the creative power, and the conviction of a lyric poet.
-
이광운(Kwang-Woon Lee) 한국영미어문학회 2009 영미어문학 Vol.- No.92
This paper attempts to show that Whitman's greatest and longest poem, "Song of Myself," can be viewed in terms of M. M. Bakhtin's dialogic imagination. Whitman reveals his sense of dialogical imagination by adopting the poet-reader relationship throughout the poem. Whitman's dialogical imagination, which is well compared with that of Bakhtin's, is embodied by the conversational style between the poet and the reader. Whitman's sense of the reader's role and sense of multi-voicedness or polyphony, and his concept openness and inclusiveness are all similar to Bakhtin's dialogical imagination. Whitman adopts many different poetic speakers in "Song of Myself," such as : the poet himself, a teacher, Christ, an evolutionist, a barbarian, a lover of nature, etc. Whitman's poetic speakers of many voices not only show his poetic principles but also show the various phenomena of both man and nature. Reading Whitman's "Song of Myself" in terms of dialogical imagination can help to properly understand an otherwise enigmatic poem, because of its loose structure.
-
최희섭(Choi, Hie Sup) 한국동서비교문학학회 2009 동서 비교문학저널 Vol.0 No.20
Walt Whitman’s Song of Myself is a poem which can be discussed in many respects. That’s why many papers and books about this poem are published all over the world. As The Song of Myself expresses Whitman’s thoughts on the democracy, American people and himself, the work is discussed in such a viewpoint as Christianity, democracy, Orientalism, and Buddhism etc. In this paper, the focus is given to the view of time. As time is a subject which almost all the writers have an interest, Whitman cannot help expressing his thought on time directly and indirectly. This paper examines Whitman’s view of time expressed in the poem, Song of Myself in the viewpoint of Buddhism. His view of time is somewhat similar to that of Buddhism. In Buddhism, the existence of time itself is denied, but Whitman doesn’t deny the existence of time, but emphasizes the present. He thinks the present includes the past and the future. The thought is not different from thought of Buddhism.
-
최희섭(Choi, Hie Sup) 한국동서비교문학학회 2008 동서 비교문학저널 Vol.0 No.18
Walt Whitman’s intention, as he said in the preface of Leaves of Grass and Two Rivulets, was to chant the songs of the body and existence in Leaves of Grass and then to compose another volume on the soul. But he didn"t write another volume but rewrote and enlarged Leaves of Grass. Thus, Leaves of Grass became songs of body and soul. Whitman even asserts that he is the poet of the Body and of the Soul. In Song of Myself, he expresses his various thoughts on the body, nature, democracy, and the soul, etc. When he thinks of the body and the soul, he cannot help thinking of death. His thought on death and afterlife is based on the metempsychosis. Death is thought to be not a termination of existence or an entrance to heaven but a stage to go through to be born again. Though all the living existences experience many deaths and many births, their deaths and births are not a separate happening but a phase of a continuous life which appears in different forms and different bodies. The poet himself doesn’t know even the name of the existence in his self which doesn’t die and live everlastingly. But he firmly believes that something that makes metempsychosis possible exists in his self.
-
불교의 ‘무아(無我)’에 비추어 본 휘트먼의 ‘자아(自我)’
설태수 한국중앙영어영문학회 2011 영어영문학연구 Vol.53 No.4
In Buddhism, everything does not have its own fixed reality. Because everything is always changing by dint of their innumerable elementary particles working incessantly within themselves. Even though the objects seem to be fixed, they are changing essentially. The particles are called ‘quarks’ in the theory of elementary particles. The quarks, as the ultimate particles of matter, have the electric force and spin, but they can not be observed by physical eyes. Therefore matter is regarded as ‘something empty’ or ‘no-self’ in Buddhism. In other words, matter can be existed only by ‘something empty’[‘no-self’], that is to say, ‘quarks.’ And we can also imagine ‘something empty’ as ‘something infinite,’ for the invisible world belongs to the infinite. In “Song of Myself” Walt Whitman perceived the immortality in human being and every matter, and he regarded not only himself but others as divine. Because, as in his poetry, he beheld God in every object and saw something of God each hour of the twenty-four. Therefore, we can imagine every object has an immortality in the context of its own Godhood. As just as mentioned above, Whitman’s recognition about the self is very similar to the no-self in Buddhism as well. Because they both have a common insight into matter[object] in the light of the being’s immortality. In conclusion, everything[phenomena] is in the absolute equality among themselves, because each matter has its own infinity regardless of its size, quantity, and its durability. Therefore everything, including human being, is one family.
KCI
코리아스칼라연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
