RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        Cosmetic Evaluation Methods Adapted to Asian Patients after Breast- Conserving Surgery and Examination of the Necessarily Elements for Cosmetic Evaluation

        Yuki Nohara,Noriko Hanamura,Hisamitsu Zaha,Hiroko Kimura,Yumi Kashikura,Takashi Nakamura,Aya Noro,Nao Imai,Mai Shibusawa,Tomoko Ogawa 한국유방암학회 2015 Journal of breast cancer Vol.18 No.1

        Purpose: Although various strategies have been reported, thereare no defined criteria for cosmetic evaluation methods afterbreast-conserving surgery (BCS). Since Asians tend to havesmaller breasts, indistinct inframammary folds, and conspicuousscars, differences in the cosmetic results are expected. So weexamined two subjective methods and one objective method todetermine the differences, and elements necessary for a cosmeticevaluation after BCS. Methods: Frontal photographs of 190Japanese were evaluated using the Harris scale (Harris) and theevaluation method proposed by the Japanese Breast Cancer SocietySawai group (Sawai group) as the subjective methods, andthe Breast Cancer Conservation Treatment cosmetic results(BCCT.core) as the objective method, respectively. In order to examinethe necessary elements for developing a new ideal method,100 out of 190 were selected and assessed separately by sixraters using both the Harris and modified Sawai group methodsin the observer assessment. The correlation between the twomethods was examined using the Spearman rank-correlation coefficient. Results: The results of the BCCT.core and the other twomethods were clearly different. In the observer assessment, theconsensuses of the six raters were evaluated as follows: 27, 27,26, and 20 cases were evaluated as “excellent,” “good,” “fair,”and “poor,” respectively. For the Spearman rank-correlation coefficient,values higher than 0.7 indicated a strong correlation, asseen by the values of 0.909 for the breast shape and 0.345 forthe scar. The breast shape accounted for the most significantpart of the evaluation, and the scar had very little correlation. Conclusion:In this study, we recognized a clear difference betweenthe subjective and objective evaluation methods, and identifiedthe necessary elements for cosmetic evaluation. We would like tocontinue developing an ideal cosmetic evaluation that is similar tosubjective one and is independent from raters.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼