http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
Use of abdominal compression device in colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Yousaf Zafar,Ahmed Mustafa Rashid,Syed Sarmad Javaid,Ahmed Kamal Siddiqi,Adnan Zafar,Arsalan Zafar Iqbal,Jagpal Singh Klair,Rajesh Krishnamoorthi 대한소화기내시경학회 2023 Clinical Endoscopy Vol.56 No.4
Background/Aims: Colonoscopy for screening is associated with unpleasant experiences for patients, and abdominal compression devices have been developed to minimize these problems. However, there is a paucity of data supporting the therapeutic benefits of this strategy. This study examined the effects of using an abdominal compression device during colonoscopy on the cecal intubation time (CIT), abdominal compression, patient comfort, and postural changes. Methods: We searched PubMed and Scopus (from inception to November 2021) for randomized controlled trials that assessed the effects of an abdominal compression device during colonoscopy on CIT, abdominal compression, patient comfort, and postural change. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) and Mantel-Haenszel odds ratios (ORs) were calculated. Results: Our pooled analysis of seven randomized controlled trials revealed that abdominal compression devices significantly reduced CIT (WMD, –0.76 [–1.49 to –0.03] minutes; p=0.04), abdominal compression (OR, 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28–0.94; p=0.03), and postural changes (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.27–0.78; p=0.004) during colonoscopy. However, our results did not show a significant change in patient comfort (WMD, –0.48; 95% CI, –1.05 to 0.08; p=0.09) when using an abdominal compression device. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that employing an abdominal compression device may reduce CIT, abdominal compression, and postural change but have no impact on patient comfort.
A comparative study of linear control strategies on the aerodynamics twin rotor system
Adnan Qayyum Shah,Muhammad Awais,Muhammad Zafar,Ashfaq Ahmed,Muhammad Mudassar,Muhammad Muneer,Memoona Saif,Abdul Razzaq,Seong Ho Jang,김선형,박영권 대한기계학회 2023 JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Vol.37 No.8
This work presents the comparative study among pole-placement (PP), optimalcontrol using output-feedback (OCOF), linear-quadratic regulator (LQR), and PID controllers for the twin rotor multi-input multi-output system (TRMS). The pitch and yaw are key attributes for stabilizing the TRMS MIMO system and control of flight. The main objective of this study is to use these classical controller techniques to monitor the pitch and yaw angles of TRMS and show the result of these techniques. Simulation results depicts the actual performance and reveals how PP outperforms the other techniques.
Bani-Fwaz Mutasem Z, Adnan,Mahmood Zafar,Bilal Muhammad,EI-Zahhar Adel A,Khan Ilyas,Niazai Shafiullah 한국CDE학회 2024 Journal of computational design and engineering Vol.11 No.2
The study of variety of Newtonian nanofluids subject to various physical model parameters gained much interest of engineers and scientists. Owing to their coolant and absorption characteristics, these are broadly found in chemical engineering, biomedical engineering (expansion and contraction of veins and arteries), detection of cancer cells through magnetic nanoparticles, microchips, and particularly in petroleum industry. This study focuses on investigation of nanofluid heat transfer applications inside a channel formed by expanding/contracting walls. A new heat transport model is introduced by adding the effects of nanoparticles and molecular diameters, thermal radiations, and walls permeability. Then, numerical code for the model is developed and executed to analyze the dynamics of the model from physical aspects. For expanding (${\alpha }_1 = 1.0,2.0,3.0,4.0$) and contracting (${\alpha }_1 = - 1.0, - 2.0, - 3.0, - 4.0$) walls, the velocity is examined maximum in the channel center. However, the fluid movement in the working domain is in reverse proportion for ${Re} = 1.0,3.0,5.0,7.0$. Further, high absorbent walls (${A}_1 = 0.1,0.3,0.5,0.7$) controlled the motion for both ${\alpha }_1 > 0$ and ${\alpha }_1 < 0$, respectively. The addition of thermal radiation number ${Rd} = 0.1,0.3,0.5,0.7$ played the role of catalytic parameter which imperatively increased the fluid temperature. Further, contracting walls and temperature ratio number ${\theta }_r = 0.1,0.3,0.5,0.7$ reduced the temperature and this decrease is rapid in conventional fluid.