http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
허선 대한비뇨의학회 2013 Investigative and Clinical Urology Vol.54 No.4
The Korean Journal of Urology began to be published exclusively in English in 2010and is indexed in PubMed Central/PubMed. This study analyzed a variety of citation indicators of the Korean Journal of Urology before and after 2010 to clarify the present position of the journal among the urology category journals. The impact factor, SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), impact index, Z-impact factor (ZIF, impact factor excluding self-citation),and Hirsch Index (H-index) were referenced or calculated from Web of Science,Scopus, SCImago Journal & Country Ranking, Korean Medical Citation Index (KoMCI), KoreaMed Synapse, and Google Scholar. Both the impact factor and the total citations rose rapidly beginning in 2011. The 2012 impact factor corresponded to the upper 84.9% in the nephrology-urology category, whereas the 2011 SJR was in the upper 58.5%. The ZIF in KoMCI was one fifth of the impact factor because there are only two other urology journals in KoMCI. Up to 2009, more than half of the citations in the Web of Science were from Korean researchers, but from 2010 to 2012, more than 85% of the citations were from international researchers. The H-indexes from Web of Science,Scopus, KoMCI, KoreaMed Synapse, and Google Scholar were 8, 10, 12, 9, and 18,respectively. The strategy of the language change in 2010 was successful from the perspective of citation indicators. The values of the citation indicators will continue to increase rapidly and consistently as the research achievement of authors of the Korean Journal of Urology increases.
허선,정명현 대한의사협회 2013 대한의사협회지 Vol.56 No.3
The International Association of Medical Regulatory Authorities has suggested three roles for a countryʼs medical regulatory authority: first, it should provide the graduates of medical schools and immigrant physicians licenses to practice in the country; second, it should provide high-quality educational and training programs to promote and maintain the health and safety of the public and ensure professionalism; third, it should resolve public complaints regarding medical practice so as to increase rapport between professionals and the public. In Korea, the first function has been performed by the National Health Personnel Licensing Examination Board. The second function has been executed by the Korean Medical Association as required by medical law since 2012. No authority has been designated to deal with the third function, so this role has been ceded to the legal market. There are three major reasons that the time has come to establish medical regulatory authority in Korea. First, to assure a minimum quality of medical service, more vigorous continuing medical education must be required for licensure. Second, specific and comprehensive preparation should be made available for medical professionals who immigrate, including physicians from North Korea. Third, the establishment of a regulatory authority is the easiest and most reasonable way to establish and promote a level of professionalism that is respected by the public. To establish a medical regulatory authority in Korea, not only physicians but also the government and the public should participate in discussions of this topic. The medical societies should lead the process of discussion, and the societiesʼ agreement with any regulatory outcomes should be obtained.
성숙(成熟)한 시장경제(市場經濟)를 위한 경쟁문화(競爭文化) 정착방안(定着方案)에 대한 일고(一考)
許宣 한국질서경제학회 2001 질서경제저널 Vol. No.
공정위의 정책적 노력에도 불구하고 공정거래법 위반건수는 매년 늘어나고 있다. 그 근본적인 이유는 우리사회에 경쟁문화(competition culture)가 조성ㆍ정착되지 않고 있는 점을 지적할 수 있다. 어떠한 정책이든지 관련된 문화가 밑받침되지 않을 경우에는 목표를 제대로 달성할 수 없기 때문이다. 특히, 경쟁정책은 서구에서 태동하여 개인주의ㆍ합리주의를 바탕으로 하고 있는데 반해, 우리나라의 경우 농업사회적 전통에 기반을 둔 집단주의적 가치관이 잔존하고 있다는 점이 감안되어야 할 것이다. 경쟁문화를 체계적으로 조성ㆍ정착시키기 위해서는, 모럴해저드의 방지ㆍ기업윤리의 정착 등 경제주체의 의식선진화, 대ㆍ중소기업에 대한 자율준수문화 확산방안, 반경쟁행위에 대한 민간의 감시역량 강화, 정부부처내 경쟁원리 확산방안 등이 체계적으로 추진되어야 할 것이다.