http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
최병갑(Byeong-Kap Choi) 한국영미어문학회 2013 영미어문학 Vol.- No.109
This article aims at analyzing the conflicting forces between various classes in the Irish society during the first few decades of the 20th century. Joyce makes through his main works the succinct and implicit statements about the contemporary political events and diagnoses this situation a state of paralysis as in Dubliners, A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, and Ulysses. Joyce reveals the true cause of the paralysis in Ireland and explains that it is attributed to the British imperial control over Ireland. Joyce identifies there are two conflicting groups the Irish people and society; the English and the Irish and the Irish and the Anglo-hish Joyce believes that the English and the Anglo-hish prevails the Irish society. Therefore, Joyce recognizes that the clash between different groups in Ireland is indispensable and has always existed In his opinion, splits between groups lead to oppositions and antagonisms, accentuating and deepening social disintegration in the critical periods of Irish history which must have the opportunity to achieve Home Rule or independence from the English government. However, Joyce censures both sides in that the Catholic Irish excessively resort to the physical forces and the Anglo-Irish overtly conforms to or supports the imperial politics. In fact, there were so many revolutionary violences and counter-violences and innocent Irish people were imprisoned and sentenced to death. Joyce draws a conclusion that the opposite identities-the Irishness and the Englishness or the Anglo- Irishness-bring about a series of incessant conflicts which procrastinate Home Rule and independence for a long time, thereby resulting in the whole Ireland trapped in the state of imperialistic oppression.
최병갑(Choi Byeong-Kap) 대구대학교 인문과학연구소 2011 人文科學硏究 Vol.36 No.-
James Joyce was a self-willed Irish writer while his country was under the reign of the British. Ironically, his major works, nevertheless, adopts Ireland and its capital city, Dublin as the backgrounds and themes of his works coherently. It can be assumed that this paradox is derived from his deep affection for his mother land. In this vein, James Joyce should not be denounced as having been obsessed with developing his own literary techniques isolating himself from contemporary social realities. Before leaving his country, Joyce concluded that the Irish nationalism has already lost the cultural and political energy which could bind his country and his countrymen together. In fact, the Irish Catholic were the most influential in leading the Irish into the political independence from the British colonialism. The Catholic leaders, however, failed to show their leadership because of their narrowness and excessive interference with the Irish politics and this tragic aftermath deterred the independence of Ireland. Joyce diagnosed his contemporary cultural and political energy as not integrated but disintegrated one. Joyce did not lost his interest in the political situations of his country during his stay in Europe. His consistent attachment to his country should be thought of as the direct expression of love for his country. Joyce's personas facing up to their reality were incessantly engaged In the affairs concerning Ireland and the Irish. These characters' beliefs and expressions correspond with those of Joyce's. They must be the surrogates of Joyce and therefore we should read Joyce as a realist writer who reveals his true affections which underlies through major works.