http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
대학원 강의를 위한 스마트 교육 콘텐츠 개발 및 활용 방안 제안
차희영 ( Hee Young Cha ),박혜민 ( Hye Min Park ) 한국교원대학교 과학교육연구소 2013 청람과학교육연구논총 Vol.19 No.1
This study is development of ``Methodology for Research in Science Education`` e-Book that is accessibility and availability as the one of methods to help graduate students who major in science education to write their thesis proposals. Using the DocZoom Creator, two e-Books for course material and lecture were developed then they were used at ``Methodology for Research in Science Education`` course for fifteen weeks. Graduate students had their digital devices when they took part in course and they were able to write their thesis proposal by taking note that related to their studies where applicable after fifteen weeks. The developed e-Book will use for course material continuously and we expect that the e-Book may be able to help them to write a thesis proposal without troubles by using the e-Book on lecture.
한국의 지역적 특성을 고려한 STS 모듈 및 그 평가 방법의 개발
차희영 ( Hee Young Cha ),심재호 ( Jae Ho Shim ),임채성 ( Chae Seong Lim ),김은경 ( Eun Kyeong Kim ),김성하 ( Sung Ha Kim ) 한국과학교육학회 2004 한국과학교육학회지 Vol.24 No.2
This study aims to develop STS modules which consider the local concerns of Korean society and their authentic evaluation instruments. Their titles are as follows: `Health-Aiding Foods, are they necessary?`, `Competition between Alien and Native Species`, `Living Lesson of Lake Shihwa`, and `Problems of food wastes; Would you like to throw them away, if they are money?` All of them deal with issues unique to Korean local situations. Each module consisted of two versions; a student worksheet and a teachers` guide. Students` activities were categorized into six processes such as group activities, investigation, discussion and presentation, experiments, field trip, and multiple intelligence activities. Various assessment tools and abilities for the decision-making in their STS classes were also included. In order to validate these modules, 24 teachers who have been teaching science, biology and environmental science in the secondary schools reviewed these modules and provided feedbacks about their validity and usefulness. We expect that the various rubrics included in each module will provide teachers creative and flexible assessment methods for students` understandings and their decision-making abilities toward the issues.
황은영 ( Eun Young Hwang ),차희영 ( Hee Young Cha ) 한국교원대학교 과학교육연구소 2012 청람과학교육연구논총 Vol.18 No.1
This study is performed for the purpose of identifying the characteristics of instruments for investigating conceptions about evolution as a principal concept to understand biology. Concept categories, item subjects, item types, and response subjects among instruments for testing evolution conceptions used in the published research papers were compared and analyzed. As results, the most items were to investigate evolution mechanism including natural selection; however, the items to ask the conception of species were rare. The origin of life as a concept of chemical evolution was covered. Animal was the most frequent subject. Multiple choice type for quantitative analysis was the most used in the instruments. Secondary students were used as the most participated group of research subjects for the researches. It is expected that this study will function as a basic data to development instrument to test some biology concepts in future.
초등 교사들의 과학사 기반 광합성 개념 유형에 따른 PCK 분석
박지영 ( Ji Young Park ),차희영 ( Hee Young Cha ) 한국교원대학교 과학교육연구소 2014 청람과학교육연구논총 Vol.20 No.1
In this study, we classified PCK characteristics of teachers following concept types of science history based photosynthesis. For this study, 6 teachers were selected as subjects who taught photosynthesis session for 5thgraders and belonged to 3 steps of concept types of science history based photosynthesis excluding vitalism model. PCK was compared and analyzed through data such as pre-questionnaire, recording classes and interviews with selected teachers. Results of this study are as follows. First, there was difference in teaching orientation depending on the concept types of science history based photosynthesis. Second, there was difference in knowledge and beliefs about curriculum depending on the concept types of science history based photosynthesis. Third, there was no difference in knowledge and beliefs about students and understanding about students depending on the concept types of science history based photosynthesis. Fourth, there was no significant association between the concept types of science history based photosynthesis and the knowledge and beliefs about teaching strategies. Teachers had various teaching strategies regardless of the concept types of photosynthesis. Based on the results of this study, we suggest that a variety of education and training is required for teachers and a place is systematically required for varied communication where fellow teachers can exchange ideas.
박혜민 ( Hye Min Park ),차희영 ( Hee Young Cha ) 한국교원대학교 과학교육연구소 2011 청람과학교육연구논총 Vol.17 No.1
The purpose of this study is analyzing research trend III evolutionary education in Korea. First, the articles in 1978-2010 of the Journal of Korean Association for Research in Science Education and 1968-2010 of the Korean Journal of Biological Education were categorized according to five year, then analyzed by three types of research, the research methods, subjects, and objects. A rate of evolutionary education articles published every five years gradually were increased. Particularly, it was very increased from 2000. Most research articles of evolutionary education went for the type of descriptive research, but articles of the type of development of teaching-learning program and application were increased. In research methods, most articles went for Quantitative research and mixed research. Although they were many articles about type of Quantitative research before 2000, they were increased articles about type of mixed research after 2000. Most articles were researched in subject of science conceptual learning and object of student. Results in research method and subject didn``t correspond with Park and Kim(2007)``s results, but results in type of research and research object corresponded with theirs.