http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 이윤보(Yoon Boo Lee) (검색결과 3 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
이윤보(Yoon Boo Lee),이동주(Dong Joo Lee),이병구(Byung Gu Lee) 건국대학교 경제경영연구소 2003 商經硏究 Vol.28 No.2
In the 21st century, the size and role of the private sector has grown to a great extent. Also a noticeable change is expected in the direction and pace of progress with the development of high technology and expanding information services. Industrial structures will become more technology-and knowledge-intensive. They will be backed up by new technology like computers and communications technology. In addition, the increasing diversified demand of consumers makes the goods of companies variegated in small quantities. The free movement of capital will accelerate globalized industrial acitveites. These trends has shifted its policy from the so-called “old fashioed support measure” to the new one of actively responding to innovations of the 21st century. Old fashioned excessive support measures towards SMEs can weaken theior viability, lowers their competitiveness and make them dependent on the government. What makes matters worse, there is so-called “moral hazard”, that is, relying on government support and avoiding efforts to improve productivity and reform management and technology. In this respect, new government’s policy direction is to improve the structure and international competitiveness of SMEs and to reduce competition-restrictive systems, so as to keep ahead of the changes and challenges in the new era in which they are expected to play a leading role. Therefore, the government helps SMEs develop their own capabilities to win fierce competition on the basis of flexibility and creativity unique to them. Also, the government is actively working on easing restrictions on enterprise activities, abolishing competition-restrictive measures aimed at protecting SMEs, promoting management suited to a global standard.
-
-
이윤보,이동주 한국중소기업학회 2004 中小企業硏究 Vol.26 No.1
본 연구는 현행 고유업종제도의 실효성 분석을 통해 중소기업 고유업종제도의 합리적 개선방안을 모색하는데 그 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 통계자료 분석과 인터뷰 조사를 병행 실시하였다. 분석 결과, 고유업종의 시장구조는 다수의 중소업체들이 밀집되어 있으며, 다수의 고유업종이 산업 라이프사이클상 성숙기, 쇠퇴기에 접어들어 있고, 국제경쟁력이 지속적으로 감소하는 경향이 있으며, 그 원인은 가격경쟁력의 약화에 있다. 따라서 고유업종제도와 관련하여 다음과 같은 정책방향을 제시하였다. 첫째, 국내 경제의 성장과 산업환경의 변화, 국가간 경쟁의 심화 등에 신축적으로 대응해 나가기 위해서는 고유업종제도를 단계적으로 축소ㆍ조정해 나가는 방향이 검토되어야 할 것이다. 둘째, 중소기업 고유업종은 우리 경제의 효율을 제고할 수 있는 방향으로 조정해 나가되 그 영향이 상대적으로 작을 업종 순으로 단계적ㆍ합리적인 해제예시기간 설정을 통해 조정토록 함으로써 해당 업계가 고유업종제도의 개편에 대응해 나갈 수 있도록 해야할 것이다. 셋째, 고유업종제도의 폐지는 사업조정제도, 공정거래제도 등 여타 지원제도를 통한 보완대책을 전제로 추진되어야 할 것이다. The Korean Government has performed various policies to encourage the small and medium enterprises(SMEs). Designation of industry for SMEs is one of those policies. In principle, it restricts new entey of large enterprises to specific industries. However, on the country, the policy is said that it weakens the competitiveness of SMEs. This study accompanies by an empirical study was states in order to analyze the effects of designation of industry weather it enforces the competitiveness of SMEs. According to this study, first, the policy works as a strong entry barrier to large enterprises which wants a new entry to the market. It protects the benefit of large enterprises which is already entered into the market rather than it does to SMEs. Second, as the acceleration of domestic market opening under the global competition regime, the regulation on foreign investment is decreasing and imports are increasing. In current circumstances, the regulation on large enterprise entry Is unfair, and does not enhance the global competitiveness of industry. As a result, designation of industry does not much for the enforcement of competitiveness of SMEs, and is loosing its effectiveness because of market opening.
KCI연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
