http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
박성재(Seong-jae Park),박준기(Joon-kee Park),송주호(Ju-ho Song),채광석(Gwang-seok Chae),문한필(Han-pil Moon) 한국농촌경제연구원 2011 한국농촌경제연구원 정책연구보고서 Vol.- No.-
This study is aimed to suggest how to improve performance and efficiency of government subsidy programs for agricultural sector. More specifically, it is designed to address followings: First, general definition of agricultural support and the classified catalogue of WTO domestic support are reviewed. Second, the current status of agricultural support is examined and a direction of its reform is proposed. Third, an appropriate size of agricultural support is considered. Finally, it suggests ways to revamp direct payments, individual subsidy programs, and the management system of implementing agricultural support, which are major issues in the agricultrual support reform. Agricultural subsidies have brought about a set of positive effects on competitiveness, SOC, R&D, and restructuring in the sector, even though too many subsidy programs, each having different goal and target and inefficiency of their implementation have been pinpointed as shortcomings. However, agricultural subsidies have also produced some adverse effects on the sector. First, they have spurred dependence on government aids and weaken farmers’ ability to stand on their own. Second, problems associated with direct payment are pointed out, including its concentration on rice and paddy field, overproduction of rice, a lack of incentive for upland field corps which are in short of production. Third, the projects as FTA countermeasures have so high portion of support, 74.4% that much concern is being voiced about deepening dependence on government and excess demand for the pojects. Fourth, there exist inefficient factors in the management system of budget and fund. Finally, government-oriented fiscal funds would stand in the way of private investment in agriculture. This study focuses on the reforms of direct payments, individual subsidy programs, and their implementing system. The principle of the reforms is based on the consensus from the ’Committee of Advanced Agriculture and Fishery(2009.07)’. Each subsidy program is reconsidered to determine whether it should be abolished, be integrated with other program, be changed to loan program, or be adjusted with lower share of support, and so on. In this stage, the reform of agricultural direct payments would be conducted focusing on the modification of rice direct payment. In order to mitigate overproduction of rice, the variable payment needs to be coupled with production costs. The newly discussed public-service direct payment is not widely shared opinions yet and would be difficult in securing enough fund for implementation. However, in the near future when further opening of domestic agriculture starts to lower profitability of upland crops, a comprehensive reform of agricultural direct payments will be required.
김동원(Dong-Weon Kim),박준기(Joon-Kee Park),윤종열(Jong-yul Yun),박혜진(Hye-Jin Park) 한국농촌경제연구원 2012 한국농촌경제연구원 연구자료 Vol.- No.-
In [2012 Public Opinion Survey to Agriculture & Farm village] conducted by KREI in order to support the development of research demands and the establishment of policies, the trend which the opinions of farmers are changed into the positive in a living in farm village and the negative in agriculture has been shown. Satisfaction of farm village conditions is continuously increased recently over years. Job satisfaction, however, declines for two consecutive years. In addition, the anxiety to the future has been expressed showing gloomy prospect to agricultural situation after 10 years reaches to two times of hopeful forecast. 9 of 10 citizens answer that agriculture is important in national economy and the government should protect the agriculture but in detailed indicator, the support rating to agriculture & farm village declines. The ratio to approve the function of public interest in agriculture & farm village and the will to pay additional tax are decreased, 6 of 10 citizens have the recognition that as the open-door is extended, consumers will have benefits, and the loyalties to purchase domestic produced agricultural products that even the price is high, our agricultural products should be bought remained to 34.1% dropped recently over three years. People evaluates that agricultural policy during five years of current government did good in production based policy and returning to farm village policy and did bad in the policy of agricultural products price stablization and farmers income stablization policy. It is indicated that people considers the threatening elements of agriculture are expanding open-door and aging of farm village households and farmers consider extreme weather condition and the change of planting condition as a big threat. As for agricultural policy area which next government should focus the most, citizens answered as in order of agriculture, foods, and farm village, farmers as agriculture, farm village, and foods in order, and specialists as in order of farm village, agriculture, and foods. This has shown the difference in priority. As for agricultural issues which next government should solve, aging and insufficient labors are answered as first and the gap of income between citizens and farmers and the improvement of distribution structure are also answered as main tasks. As for the distribution of agricultural budget, citizens consider foods safety as a priority but farmers self-sufficiency rate of food and specialists global competitiveness of agriculture. 5 of 10 citizens answered to have the will to return to farm village but 44.7% doesnt know the support policy. Therefore, more active promotion should be made. It is indicated that the gap in satisfactions of living environment and quality of life between citizens and farmers has been largely reduced. In this survey before the launch of next government, it is recognized a variety of policy needs of farmers who are producers, citizens who are consumers, and specialists. We expect that such opinions would be reflected to the establishment of future visions and policies for agriculture and farm village and therefore, the effectiveness of these policies is to be raised.
민선형 ( Sun Hyung Min ),김관수 ( Kwan Soo Kim ),박준기 ( Joon Kee Park ),안동환 ( Dong Hwan An ) 한국농업경제학회 2015 農業經濟硏究 Vol.56 No.4
This paper evaluates the income effects of the direct income compensation payment program for rice farmers and investigates the determinants of income effects using farm household economy survey data during 2003-2012. The effects of the direct payment program were measured by first and second moments (mean and variance) and coefficient of variation (CV) of income distribution. We simulate changes in mean by direct payment to measure income enhancement effects and simulate changes in CV by direct payment to measure income stabilization effects. The empirical results reveal that i) the direct payment program contributes to both mean and variance of farm household income; and ii) over 70 ages, total land, and farm type variables have positive effect on income enhancement and income stabilization.