http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 박득배(Deukbae Park) (검색결과 3 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
실질적 자기결정권 실현수단인 후견계약제도의 활성화에 관한 연구
박득배(Park, Deukbae) 충북대학교 법학연구소 2017 法學硏究 Vol.28 No.1
The development of guardianship contracts is a global trend. A guardian contract must be an autonomous contract. From the viewpoint of respect for self-determination, if a person can conclude a guardian contract based on his / her trust and confidence, and determine the secretariat to be handled by a guardian, the criteria and method of handling the guardian, and grant the necessary authority, Even when lost, we will be able to continue our self-determined life as a member of society. It is important for the guardian contract to confirm and realize his / her doctor because he has the basic idea to utilize the residual ability and to respect his own opinion as much as possible. However, it is not an exaggeration to say that the content of the guardianship contract is not limited to the property management but may also include the protection of personal property. Therefore, the meaning of autonomy should be emphasized in order to preserve the realization of the self -determination right by foreseeing the lack of decision - making ability which may occur in the future, and to implement the guardian contract. The effect of a custodial contract is a state of lack of decision-making capacity, that is, a state requiring protection, and it is necessary to control whether the self-determination of the party is realized as intended. In this regard, the Civil Code has legalized the arbitrator as a mandatory institution, and the family of the guardian deprived of the qualification. In the case of the guardianship contract, there is a case in which the guardianship contract can not be enacted because the guardianship contract is concluded by the fair deed, but the doctor. In the case of a guardian contract in which a contract is executed under the condition that the decision-making ability of the individual is insufficient, the guardian is entrusted with the realization of the contract entirely, It will be necessary to introduce the law of faithfulness. However, since the procedural justice can not be ignored even by the necessity, it is necessary to legislate the strengthening of the state s duty to secure the legal stability as well as the concrete validity. In addition, current civil law does not explicitly prescribe decision support. Nonetheless, the role of any guardian in a guardianship agreement needs to be reinterpreted to ensure consistency with the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. In other words, Article 9, Paragraph 4, Article 959 of the Civil Code stipulates that family courts, arbitrary guardians, arbitrary guardians, and others must respect their own utmost respect when carrying out and operating guardianship contracts. It is an obligation to realize the respect of Therefore, even in the case of decision-making agency, it is not the best interest in the objective sense, but the guardian contract should be implemented and operated through the best interpretation of the will of the ward and the line in the guardian contract. Ultimately, life as a human being is meaningful to realize his own thoughts and values and to enjoy the process in the frame of law. A custodial contract must fulfill its role as a legal means to realize the value of this life, the self-determination.
-
-
최도진(Do-Jin Choi),오영호(Young-Ho Oh),편도웅(Do-Woong Pyun),방민주(Min-Ju Bang),전종우(Jong-Woo Jeon),이현병(Hyeon-Byeong Lee),박득배(Deukbae Park),임종태(Jong-Tae Lim),복경수(Kyoung-Soo Bok),유효근(Hyo-Keun Yoo),유재수(Jae-Soo Yoo 한국콘텐츠학회 2021 한국콘텐츠학회논문지 Vol.21 No.12
특정 연구 분야에 대한 전문성을 가진 연구자를 찾기 위해서는 객관적인 전문가 판별 방법이 필요하다. 기존에는 전문가 판별을 위해 인용 그래프 기반의 판별 기법과 수식 기반의 판별 기법이 존재한다. 본 논문에서는 기존 수식 기반 판별에서 고려하지 못하였던 다양한 특성들을 반영한 효율적인 전문가 판별 기법을 제안한다. 연구자의 전문성을 판별하기 위해 품질, 생산성, 기여도, 최신성, 정확성, 지속성을 고려한 전문성 지수를 제안한다. 또한, 학술 검색 사이트만의 특성을 반영하기 위해 소셜 인용 수를 추가로 고려한다. 다양한 학술 사이트 기반의 논문 수집 및 성능 평가 결과를 제시하고 제안하는 기법의 타당성과 실현성을 입증한다. An objective expert discrimination scheme is needed for finding researchers who have insight and knowledge about a particular field of research. There are two types of expert discrimination schemes such as a citation graph based method and a formula based method. In this paper, we propose an efficient expert discrimination scheme considering various characteristics that have not been considered in the existing formula based methods. In order to discriminate the expertise of researchers, we present six expertise indices such as quality, productivity, contributiveness, recentness, accuracy, and durability. We also consider the number of social citations to apply the characteristics of academic search sites. Finally, we conduct various experiments to prove the validity and feasibility of the proposed scheme.
KCI연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
