RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        세력 변동하의 평화 구상 -한스 모겐소의 정치적 분쟁론을 중심으로-

        니시다이라 ( Taira Nishi ),이경미 한림과학원 2016 개념과 소통 Vol.- No.17

        Since the turn of the 21st century, confrontations among China, Korea and Japan have been growing ever more intense. Yet these confrontations are not prompted by newly emerging issues, rather they derive from territorial disputes between China and Japan, and between Korea and Japan, over uninhabited islands which have been argued over since the middle of the last century. The reason why such long-standing disputes have recently become more heated, with significantly more confrontational relations, is the ongoing shift in power dynamics in East Asia. The principle that disputes tend to escalate when they become entangled with international tensions arising from such shifts is well established, as noted in Morgenthau’s Politics among Nations. The current state of international relations in East Asia, and in particular how to establish a stable order, can only be understood by studying this changing landscape of power dynamics. Such power shifts are generally considered within the context of international politics, but in fact they have also played a very significant role in the history of international jurisprudence. Thus, international jurisprudence in Europe gave rise to an important theoretical discourse, centered mainly around Germany during the period between the 1870s and the inter-war era, which debated the gap between the existing legal structures and the prevailing power dynamics. Also, during the era of the League of Nations, in attempting to create a philosophy of peace, efforts were made to establish comprehensive dispute resolution procedures, which resulted in active theoretical discussions on the nature of disputes, and a generalization of the notion of disputes arising out of power shifts as ‘dynamic disputes.’ A dynamic dispute is one that arises between an emerging power’s demand for the revision of existing laws, and a dominant power’s demand for the preservation of the status quo. Morgenthau used this idea of dynamic disputes to develop a conception of international order which is centered mainly around confrontational relations between forces seeking to preserve the status quo and forces demanding to change it. This way of understanding disputes was also shared with labor jurisprudence, having a very important political impact during the inter-war period. Indeed, Morgenthau had established his theory of international law under the influence of Hugo Sinzheimer, a renowned jurist specializing in labor law.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼