http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
Licensing of MSCs and Expletive There
김학연(Hakyeon Kim) 한국영미어문학회 2004 영미어문학 Vol.- No.72
In Agr-less model, Exp and Subj are Specs of T with Tomax as head, Uninterpretable [D] feature of Exp in tbe outer Spec of T is deleted by adjoining [N] of the associate NP through free riding when FF(A) adjoins to matrix Tomax to cbeck Case and φof T. If the uninterpretable strong [nominal] feature of T is cbecked but not erased acrorrung to parametric property of T, then Exp with PF effect is inserted in the outer Spec of T from the numeration, obtaining MSCs. The typical example is Icelandic with two Specs when one time of [-erase] is selected. In other words, MSC with [+strong T] tolerates single unforced violation of Procrastinate. In Agree theory, discarding Tomax adjuoction, Exp(there) is taken to be XO(Probe) rather than [D]. The only [person] feature on Exp in normal expletive construction or MSCs is checked through Agree or multiple Agree.
김학연(Hakyeon Kim) 현대문법학회 1999 현대문법연구 Vol.16 No.-
The aim of this paper is to survey the distribution of null subjects and null objects found in Korean and to show that the previous approaches to explain their licensing have not been so successful. We will also show that the licensing of the null arguments are better explained through the methodology of Optimality theory. In accordance with the optimality theory, the constraint ranking such as DropTopic = Parse or DropTopic >> Parse can solve the problems remained in control theory and Huang’s generalized control rule because by changing the constraint ranking even the pro-drop parameters can be explained better. Particularly the asymmetry found in the licensing of null subjects and null objects can be solved with a couple of constraints. However, there remain some detailed problems in the licensing related with pragmatic context and some idiosyncratic features of individual word. And further research for the interpretation of null arguments in Optimality methodology is expected.
김학연(Hakyeon Kim) 현대문법학회 2012 현대문법연구 Vol.68 No.-
This paper discusses the phenomenon of dative alternation in English, and presents syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic explanations to the choice between dative structure and double object structure. It will be argued that a unified explanation encompassing the discourse variables based on the corpus analysis in Williams (1994) and Bresnan and Nikitina (2008) as well as the syntactic structure suggested in Larson (1988) and the typology of verbs in Krifka (2003) is needed to explain the diversity of the dative alternation