http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 김종필 ( Yong Sik Lee (검색결과 2 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
-
이용식(Yong Sik Lee),김종필(Jong Pil Kim) 한국사회체육학회 1996 한국사회체육학회지 Vol.6 No.-
The purpose of this study was to examine the Client`s Satisfaction about the District Sports Center Management by sex, age, school career and to examine the degree of satisfaction of total clients about the District Sports Center Management. The Subjects were the District Sports Center managing every self-government district of Seoul City, and The final subjects were all 570 people-male 136 and female 434. The questionnaire used on this study was the Client`s Satisfaction questionnaire about management of District Sports Center which modified "Sports for All Class survey analysis questionnaire" developed by the Korean Sports Science Institute. The reliability of the questionnaire was cronbach`s α=.7232~.8547. The statistics employed in this study were frequency, T-test, one-way Anova methods. Discussion on the results described using both frequency results and data considered through literature study. The results of this study were as follows: 1. Client`s satisfaction of District Sports Center Management by sex didn`t have any difference. Also in sub-factor didn`t have any difference. Client`s satisfaction score of District Sports Center Management, Female(3.24) higher than Male(3.23). 2. Client`s satisfaction of District Sports Center Management by age, didn`t have any difference. Over fifty(3.43) group was very high. 3. Client`s satisfaction of District Sports Center Management by school career didn`t have any difference. Over graduate(3.35) group was very high. 4. The degree to Satisfaction of total clients about the District Sports Management. 1) Satisfaction score about program of the Client of District Sports Center was high, 3.29. In sub-factor, Variety score was 3.15, Interest score was 3.62, Coincidence score between sport program and level was 3.66, Easiness score of sport program learning was 3.25. But Fitness score of participation number was low, 2.78. 2) Satisfaction score about leader of the Client of District Sports Center was very high, 3.71. In sub-factor, Practice ability score was 3.73, Way of teaching score was 3.63, Passion score was 3.78, Personal relationship score was 3.71, Professional knowledge score was 3.72. All sub-factor were over 3.00 and very high. 3) Satisfaction score about facility of the Client of District Sports Center was a little low, 2.96. In sub-factor, Principal sports facility score was 3.28, Adjunct facility score was 3.28. But Subsidiary facility score was low(2.89), Fitness score of sports supplies and equipment was very low(2.56), Completeness score of sports facility was low(2.79). 4) Satisfaction score about way of use and procedure of the Client of District Sports Center was a little low, 2.98. In sub-factor, Economics of use fare was high, 3.39. But Convenience score of registration procedure was low(2.77), Sufficiency score of free use time was low(2.87), Fitness score of using distance was low(2.82), Variety score of traffic facility was low(2.96).
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
