http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
권호기 한국생산성학회 1989 生産性論集 Vol.3 No.1
GNP is one of the most frequently used measures of economic performance. And major changes in GNP may indeed reflect severe problems or impressive gains. The very large increase in real GNP in Korea in 1991, 2000, and 2010 will be associate with a rapid rise in the material standard of living (see p. 17 , table 3). Some of the things which are included in GNP can scarely be considered contributions to human happiness. When the cold war becomes more tense, rising armament purchases are included in GNP; yet we are no happier. The need to increase productivity has been the major theme in recent years for business leaders and national spokesmen. Productivity is a major concern throughout the world. Higher productivity indicates more efficient use of inputs, mainly labor and capital. Technological advances have contributed heavily to productivity gains in recent decades. Machanized equipment, better tools, and computers have made jobs safer and more productive. Profit-sharing and bonus payments provide monetary rewards for higher productive from the entire work force. What our emprical analysis revealed is the existence of substential per capita output, productivity, and consumption gaps for the rapid growth country, where the gaps appear to the wider for consumption than for per capita output and for productivity. We were unable to compare the distribution of income on a comprehensive basis including both wage and wealth income and including all social groups. Rather, my analysis was limited to the distribution of income among under-technological country. This comparison indicated a slightly less unequal distribution of wage income in the under-technological country but failed to reveal dramatic differences in the distribution of income. Finally, I argued that the apparently greater stability of the law-growth country economy in terms of growth, price stability, and employment has led to certain efficiency and quality costs, but that these costs have been kept within manageable limits. On the other hand, we will recognize the fact that the low-growth country economy also has been among the most stable of the major 21st century's industrial-society.
權琥基 청주대학교 새마을연구소 1985 새마을硏究論文集 Vol.2 No.-
We began economic theory with a discussion of the validity of the ceteris paribus assumption, for we felt this was the crucial issue in market economy or planned economy. My research was that the ceteris paribus assumption could be applied, due primarily to the common level of postwar economic development and to the existence of a relatively North-South problem. "Agriculture versus industry" is not quite the correct way of putting the problem. Every growth economist agrees that rising per capita income is associated with a greater or smaller degree of movement from the primary sector to the secondary and tertiary sectors. Within the world as a whole, the lower income countries are the primary sector and the higher income countries the industrial sector. What our empirical analysis revealed is the existence of the substantial per capita output, productivity, and consumption gaps for the rural district, where the gaps appear to be wider for consumption than for per capita output and for productivity. Moreover, I found that these gaps do not appear to be narrowing significantly, although there is some contradictory evidence on this point. Throughout the empirical section I was troubled by certain contradictions in the rural district industrial production figures which introduced measurement errors into the aggregate figures. Concerning the priority objective of the country, economic growth, we found roughly equivalent rates of growth of output, industry and social welfare in high-technology period.
權琥基 淸州大學校 1981 論文集 Vol.14 No.1
An important function performed by resource prices in a free enterprise economy is that of allocating resources among different uses and different geographic areas in such a way as to increase the efficiency of the economy. In developing the principles of resource allocation we must exptand first our concept of resouce markets. Next we shall consider the conditions of resource allocation leading to maximum efficiency in resource use. Third, we shall examine certain factors which prevent resources from being corretly allocated. A computer code for LP, written in FORTRAN Ⅳ, is described. The data formats are described and then an illustrative problem showing the necessary cards is given. There is a program listing of the code. Recource maximum contribution occurs when value of marginal product of the resource is the same in all its possible uses. Nonprice and non-quantitative impediments to correct allocation of resources include ignorance, sociological and psychological factors, and institutional restrictions. In some instances the achievement of noneconomic values may be of more importance to society than correct resource allocation.