http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
지역사회통합건강증진사업에 따른 보건치과위생사의 직무역량 교육요구도
박수경 ( Su Kyung Park ),한양금 ( Yang Keum Han ),김영경 ( Young Kyung Kim ),임현주 ( Hyun Ju Lim ),권양옥 ( Yang Ok Kown ),김한미 ( Han Mi Kim ),오막엽 ( Mag Yup Oh ),김남희 ( Nam Hee Kim ) 대한예방치과·구강보건학회 2015 大韓口腔保健學會誌 Vol.39 No.2
Objectives: To determine the educational needs related to an integrated health and oral health project for community dental hygienists. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, a survey was administered to 1,190 dental hygienists working in community health centers and 627 (about 53%) responded. The dependent variable was educational needs from oral health projects; the independent variables were region, job assignments, job position, and degree of self-development. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests, with PASW 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and the significance threshold was .05. Results: The educational needs of community dental hygienists were found to be high, at about 58.5 points out of 100. The highest educational needs were for oral health projects linked to public health projects. In this regard, participants reported a high need for “identification of issues and projects suited to the current state of the region,” “establishment of strategies for integration of health and oral health projects,” and “prioritization.” Conclusions: Professional education for community dental hygienists should be expanded to include integration of health and oral health. It should be based on the assessment of these professionals’ educational needs.
김연주 ( Yeun Ju Kim ),한양금 ( Yang Keum Han ),김영경 ( Young Kyung Kim ),임현주 ( Hyun Ju Lim ),권양옥 ( Yang Ok Kown ),김한미 ( Han Mi Kim ),박정란 ( Jeong Ran Park ),김남희 ( Nam Hee Kim ) 한국치위생학회 2015 한국치위생학회지 Vol.15 No.1
Objectives: This study was obtained to identify current education status of the community dental hygiene practice. Methods: It was designed cross section and self-reported on-line questionnaire(Survey monkey). It was performed probability sampling by targeting 82 dental hygiene schools(each one faculty member) in charge of community dental hygiene curriculum and 254 community health centers``s community dental hygienists whom was working at oral health section. The response rate was 60% and 53%, respectively. The questionnaire consisted of time, duration, practice group, evaluation method, and practice contents including 63 learning objectives of dental hygiene. Results: Nearly half of these schools conduct such community field work practice in the spring semester of the junior year. This practice was mainly progressed based on average 4 students as one team per each one school for 7-8 hours a day during the period of more than 5 weeks(p<0.05). However, in case of both school and community health center, almost half of feedback after practice was not achieved and there was a difference in needs for practice education between schools and community health center. Conclusions: We should be considered that a sufficient consultation for the practice environment and its contents between schools and community health centers. It was considered that development of a standardized practice manual reflecting such requirement.
이기영 ( Ga-yeong Lee ),한양금 ( Yang-keum Han ),김영경 ( Young-kyung Kim ),임현주 ( Hyun-ju Lim ),권양옥 ( Yang-ok Kown ),김한미 ( Han-mi Kim ),박정란 ( Jeong-ran Park ),김남희 ( Nam-hee Kim ) 한국치위생학회 2016 한국치위생학회지 Vol.16 No.1
Objectives: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the contents analysis of the community dental hygiene practice in the dental hygiene students and suggest the outcome based evaluation index of community dental hygiene practice. This study will provide the basic data for the community nursing and social welfare practice. Methods: A self-reported questionnaire was completed by 82 dental hygiene professors and 254 dental hygienists in community health centers after receiving informed consent based on institutional review board from 5th Dec 2014 to 30th Jul 2015. A total of 49 professors and 134 dental hygienists gave the complete answers. The study instrument was adapted from the literature review. The questionnaire consisted of evaluation, purpose of evaluation, and evaluation format. Data were analyzed using SPSS 20.0 program. The contents analysis was carried out through input, process, output, and outcome. Results: The practice outcome evaluation was conducted in 62.9% of the dental hygiene departments and 32.9% of the community health centers. Most of the dental hygiene professors chose To know what students learned(27.3%) and To ensure student``s role and behavior in practice(27.3%). as the purpose of evaluation. The public dental hygienists chose To score the practice grade(42.1%). The evaluation method was done anonymously. Conclusions: The outcome based evaluation in community dental hygiene practice was the best method to evaluate the practice education for the competency of the dental hygiene students.