http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : ( Ryohei Kobayashi ) (검색결과 4 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
-
Local interaction imaging by SiGe quantum dot probe
정연길,Masato Hirade,Ryohei Kokawa,Hirofumi Yamada,Kei Kobayashi,Noriaki Oyabu,Toyoko Arai,Akira Sasahara,Masahiko Tomitori 한국물리학회 2012 Current Applied Physics Vol.12 No.2
Local interaction imaging of cleaved InAs surface (110) using a high aspect ratio (HAR) SiGe quantum dot (QD) probe was demonstrated by frequency-modulation mode noncontact atomic force microscopy under atmospheric pressure. The local contrast image with pronounced brightness is mainly attributed to no contact potential difference between the HAR SiGe-QD probe apex and the sample surface, and low frequency-change of the HAR SiGe-QD probe.
-
Satoshi Sugino,Ken Inoue,Reo Kobayashi,Ryohei Hirose,Toshifumi Doi,Akihito Harusato,Osamu Dohi,Naohisa Yoshida,Kazuhiko Uchiyama,Takeshi Ishikawa,Tomohisa Takagi,Hiroaki Yasuda,Hideyuki Konishi,Yasuko 대한소화기 기능성질환∙운동학회 2022 Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility (JNM Vol.28 No.4
Background/Aims Several studies have assessed the effect of cool temperature on colonic peristalsis. Transient receptor potential melastatin 8 (TRPM8) is a temperature-sensitive ion channel activated by mild cooling expressed in the colon. We examined the antispasmodic effect of cool temperature on colonic peristalsis in a prospective, randomized, single-blind trial and based on the video imaging and intraluminal pressure of the proximal colon in rats and TRPM8-deficient mice. Methods In the clinical trial, we randomly assigned a total of 94 patients scheduled to undergo colonoscopy to 2 groups: the mildly cool water (n = 47) and control (n = 47) groups. We used 20 mL of 15°C water for the mildly cool water. The primary outcome was the proportion of subjects with improved peristalsis after treatment. In the rodent proximal colon, we evaluated the intraluminal pressure and performed video imaging of the rodent proximal colon with cool water administration into the colonic lumen. Clinical trial registry website (Trial No. UMIN-CTR; UMIN000030725). Results In the randomized controlled trial, after treatment, the proportion of subjects with no peristalsis with cool water was significantly higher than that in the placebo group (44.7% vs 23.4%; P < 0.05). In the rodent colon model, cool temperature water was associated with a significant decrease in colonic peristalsis through its suppression of the ratio of peak frequency (P < 0.05). Cool temperature-treated TRPM8-deficient mice did not show a reduction in colonic peristalsis compared with wild-type mice. Conclusion For the first time, this study demonstrates that cool temperature-dependent suppression of colonic peristalsis may be associated with TRPM8 activation.
-
The Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer
( Manabu Kawai ),( Seiko Hirono ),( Ken-ichi Okada ),( Motoki Miyazawa ),( Yuji Kitahata ),( Ryohei Kobayashi ),( Masaki Ueno ),( Shinya Hayami ),( Hiroki Yamaue ) 대한간학회 2018 춘·추계 학술대회 (KASL) Vol.2018 No.1
Backgrounds: According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines, pancre atic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) can be classified as resectable, borderline resectable, or unresectable. Although borderline resectable PDAC (BRPC) may technically be resectable, it has particularly high risks of margin-positive resection and postoperative recurrence. Therefore, preoperative treatment is recommended for BRPC patients in both the NCCN Guidelines and an expert consensus statement. However, the establishment of the most appropriate neoadjuvant therapy is needed by further studies. The aim of these studies is to evaluate the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for BRPC and confirm the safety and efficacy of two regimens of neoadjuvant therapy for BRPC. Our Clinical Trials: First, we evaluated the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for BRPC. 143 BRPC-A patients un dergoing pancreatectomy were reviewed from among 330 pancreatic cancer patients, including 111 potentially resectable pancreatic cancer patients and 76 BRPC with portal vein involvement patients. We compared the clinico pathological factors of 40 BRPC-A patients treated with neoadjuvant treatment followed by surgery and those of 103 BRPC-A patients treated with upfront surgery. The R0 rate and progression-free survival of BRPC-A patients who received neoadjuvant therapy and subsequent surgical resection were significantly better compared to those who re ceived upfront surgery (R0: P = 0.041; progression-free survival: P = 0.033), but overall survival was not significantly different. Neoadjuvant treatment followed by surgery might provide clinical benefits for BRPC-A patients; however, the establishment of the most appropriate neoadjuvant treatment is needed by further studies. To evaluate appro priate neoadjuvant treatment, two prospective pilot trials were conducted as follows; modified FOLFIRINOX (without bolus 5-FU and LV, also decreased the dose of irinotecan; FIRINOX) and nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine therapy. Modified FOLFIRINOX was given to the first five patients in the 4-cycle group of the regimen and next five patients in the 8-cycle group. The primary end point was the toxicity of the therapy and one of the secondary end points were the optimal duration. The overall rate of grade 3 and 4 events was 80 %: 3 patients (60%) in the four-cycle group and five patients (100%) in the eight-cycle group had grade 3 or 4 adverse events. There was no incidence of seri ous adverse effect such as febrile neutropenia, sepsis, liver abscess or uncontrollable diarrhea. There was no clinically relevant morbidity presented in patients who underwent surgery. R0 rates by intention to treat were 60.0% in the four-cycle group and 40 % in the eight-cycle group (P = 0.999). The histopathologic treatment effect based on the Evans grade revealed grade I (n = 1), IIa (n = 3) in the four-cycle group and grade I (n = 2), IIa (n = 1) in the eight-cy cle group. Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine therapy: the primary endpoint was the toxicity, and secondary endpoints were the resection rate, the R0 resection rate. The overall rate of any grade and grade 3-4 events were 100% and 90%. The majority of these adverse events represented expected neutropenia. The resection and R0 resection rates were 80% and 70%, respectively. Conclusion: FIRINOX therapy was feasible and safe for strictly selected patients with BRPC. On the other hand, nab-pa clitaxel plus gemcitabine therapy was safe and feasible without strict selection of patients with BRPC. A multicenter phase II study is in progress to investigate the efficacy of neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine therapy on overall survival (UMIN000024154).
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
