RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    사이버상담에서 상담자의 경력에 따른 자기대화 및 가설형성 차이 분석 = (The) Analysis of differences in self-talk and hypothesis formulation in cyber counseling according to counselor's experience

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T8603172

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The goal of this research is analyze self-talk and hypothesis formulation of counselor according to counselor's experience in cyber counseling.
    The following research questions were established for this research. First, is there quantitative and qualitative difference in the counselor's self-talk according to counselor's experience in chatting counseling? Second, is there qualitative difference in the hypothesis formulation about counselee according to counselor's experience in chatting counseling?
    To examine the stated research problems, 10 expert and 10 novice cyber counselor counselled with 3 counselee in the way of chatting counseling. After counseling, they wrote down the self-talk and hypothesis about counselee. The self-talk and hypothesis formulation, which were described, were rated by 2 rator. Collected data were analyzed by t-test.
    The results of this study were as follows.
    First, although cyber counselor's self-talk according to counselor's experience was no significant difference statistically, considering the total number and the mean score of self-talk, the expert cyber counselor used qualitatively superior self-talk than novice cyber counselor.
    Second, the expert cyber counselor used qualitatively superior hypothesis formulation than novice cyber counselor. And all low realms of hypothesis formulation was significant difference statistically.
    번역하기

    The goal of this research is analyze self-talk and hypothesis formulation of counselor according to counselor's experience in cyber counseling. The following research questions were established for this research. First, is there quantitative and qual...

    The goal of this research is analyze self-talk and hypothesis formulation of counselor according to counselor's experience in cyber counseling.
    The following research questions were established for this research. First, is there quantitative and qualitative difference in the counselor's self-talk according to counselor's experience in chatting counseling? Second, is there qualitative difference in the hypothesis formulation about counselee according to counselor's experience in chatting counseling?
    To examine the stated research problems, 10 expert and 10 novice cyber counselor counselled with 3 counselee in the way of chatting counseling. After counseling, they wrote down the self-talk and hypothesis about counselee. The self-talk and hypothesis formulation, which were described, were rated by 2 rator. Collected data were analyzed by t-test.
    The results of this study were as follows.
    First, although cyber counselor's self-talk according to counselor's experience was no significant difference statistically, considering the total number and the mean score of self-talk, the expert cyber counselor used qualitatively superior self-talk than novice cyber counselor.
    Second, the expert cyber counselor used qualitatively superior hypothesis formulation than novice cyber counselor. And all low realms of hypothesis formulation was significant difference statistically.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목차
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
    • 2. 연구 문제 = 6
    • 3. 용어 정의 = 8
    • 목차
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
    • 2. 연구 문제 = 6
    • 3. 용어 정의 = 8
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 9
    • 1. 사이버상담 = 9
    • 1) 사이버상담의 대두배경 = 9
    • 2) 사이버상담의 정의 = 10
    • 3) 사이버상담의 현황 = 11
    • 4) 사이버상담의 특징 = 12
    • 5) 사이버상담의 장·단점 = 15
    • 6) 사이버상담의 유형 = 17
    • 2. 상담자의 인지 = 21
    • 1) 상담자의 자기대화 = 23
    • ⑴ 초심상담자의 자기대화 = 24
    • ⑵ 전문상담자의 자기대화 = 25
    • ⑶ 상담자의 자기대화 교육방안 = 26
    • 2) 내담자에 대한 가설형성 = 26
    • ⑴ 초심상담자의 가설형성 = 28
    • ⑵ 전문상담자의 가설형성 = 29
    • ⑶ 내담자에 대한 가설형성 교육방안 = 30
    • Ⅲ. 연구방법 = 32
    • 1. 연구대상 = 32
    • 2. 측정도구 = 33
    • 3. 평정 = 34
    • 4. 연구절차 = 36
    • 5. 자료분석 = 36
    • Ⅳ. 연구결과 및 해석 = 38
    • 1. 상담자의 경력에 따른 상담자 자기대화 차이 = 38
    • 2. 상담자의 경력에 따른 내담자에 대한 가설형성 기술의 차이 = 42
    • Ⅴ. 논의 = 44
    • Ⅵ. 요약 및 결론 = 53
    • 참고문헌 = 55
    • 부록 = 63
    • Abstract = 74
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼