The space above and under the ground, being not fully occpied and applied, precious natural resources, are required to be developed and utilized positively.
As for the rights able to use other owner's any fixed, setional space layers above and under ...
The space above and under the ground, being not fully occpied and applied, precious natural resources, are required to be developed and utilized positively.
As for the rights able to use other owner's any fixed, setional space layers above and under the ground, applicatin of sectional superfies is concidered to be proper and best. Sectional superficies a kind of superficies (Sufice Right) that concerns such matters of sectidnalizng any fixed ranges of the space above and under the ground, giving right to users to use the space to wown buildings or other facilities, which sometimes is called 'air right' and 'underground rights'.
However, to make easy to secure rights, to make transactions safe, and to facilitate the establishment of rights concerning the space above and under the ground, any annexed right such a s easement are desirable to be utilized. And, this system of sectional superficies is short of its history of usage as well as the peopl's recognition of its habitual pracitce.
But, with regard to such a point of view, if a basic framework of such a system were studied and then, developed, on the premise that the contents of rights and interests shuld be definite, and its utilization should be facilitated and secured, then its utilization would be more active.
Nowadays, on the central streets of the big cities, demends for the space above and under the ground are daily increasing, resulting in a 'sprawl' phenomenon, and therefore, to control such conflict or disorder, a kind of administratively designed master plan is des to be composed concerning space development and in particular, the development of the under ground space.
In particular, what the problems are, though existing civil law secures personal(private) ownership with a declaration that the influence of land ownership "effectivates the space above and under the ground a s long as there go any fair benefits in its limittation of considerable rights", however, inmanagement between the public usage of the space above and under the ground and the validity of personal ownership a s well a s in compensation between those two things.
In short, there is no lawful system to regulate such things. However, for exemple, in Japan, discussion on the subject to give som usage right for the deepest space under the ground to public enterprises is being ripen.
Finally, conerning the possibility of introdoction of the systems of 'air rights' of U.S.A, if which are compared witch similar systems of our nation, following will be good compaisons for future consideration.