RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    어휘 지도법에 관한 연구 : 실업계 고등학생을 대상으로 = (A) Study on the Vocabulary Teaching Method

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T2907596

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      부산 : 동아대학교 교육대학원, 1990

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문(석사) -- 동아대학교 교육대학원 , 국어교육전공 , 1990. 8

    • 발행연도

      1990

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • 주제어
    • KDC

      712 판사항(4)

    • 발행국(도시)

      부산

    • 형태사항

      i, 72p. : 삽도 ; 26cm

    • 일반주기명

      참고문헌: p. 45

    • 소장기관
      • 경남대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
      • 경성대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 국립목포대학교 도서관(도림캠퍼스) 소장기관정보
      • 국립부경대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 대전대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 덕성여자대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 동아대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 숭실대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 신경주대학교 학술정보원 소장기관정보
      • 원광대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
      • 인제대학교 백인제기념도서관 소장기관정보
      • 청주대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 충남대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 한국학중앙연구원 한국학도서관 소장기관정보
      • 한남대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 홍익대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    As vocabulary exists as a structure in close motivation of meaning and form, classifying and learning its semantic structure to produce proper sentences or utterances in each situation lessens the burden of memorizing vocabulary one by one. The actual teaching of vocabulary with semantic groups has a positive influence on the increase of vocabulary and the command of sentences or utterances.
    Composing the subjective data of a hoped vocabulary list and the objective data of a semantic group classification table of the textbook vocabulary, I have found the following results in the actual vocabulary teaching.
    1) The use of both subjective and objective data to organize semantic groups for vocabulary teaching, as a result, made it possible for students to learn well-motiovated vocabulary with efficiency.
    2) As the result of vocabulary teaching after selecting basic vocabulary and its association groups, the separation feature between stimulus words and and response words tended to decrease while the association of the words of hish similarity and opposition was strengthened.
    3) When the vocabulary teaching was well matched with the syntatic, semantic and pragmatic viewpoints, students could get higher interest in the contexts and additional concepts of the vocabulary.
    4) When the teaching followed the guidance process and the guide book discussed here as well as the methods of association drills and the formation of relation conception and semantic groups, there was a considerable increase in the vocabulary and the command of sentences or utterances.
    5) In comparison with the control class, the experimental class had weaker separation feature through the reduction of the total number of and the types of association words, and had higher semantic and vocabulary concentration ratios.
    6) To sum up the responses of the questionnaire, a) vocabulary teaching should be done under the systematic guidance system, b) vocabulary learning by way of the motivation in semantic groups is both economical and productive, c) vocabulary instruction is meaningful in its active exercise for the purpose of actual usage, d) to distinguish lexical meaning from contextual meaning with much emphasis on the latter is absolutely necessary in vocabulary teachings, and e) vocabulary can be synthetically comprehended by mixing the viewpoints of lexical semantics, syntactic semantics and pragmatics.
    번역하기

    As vocabulary exists as a structure in close motivation of meaning and form, classifying and learning its semantic structure to produce proper sentences or utterances in each situation lessens the burden of memorizing vocabulary one by one. The actual...

    As vocabulary exists as a structure in close motivation of meaning and form, classifying and learning its semantic structure to produce proper sentences or utterances in each situation lessens the burden of memorizing vocabulary one by one. The actual teaching of vocabulary with semantic groups has a positive influence on the increase of vocabulary and the command of sentences or utterances.
    Composing the subjective data of a hoped vocabulary list and the objective data of a semantic group classification table of the textbook vocabulary, I have found the following results in the actual vocabulary teaching.
    1) The use of both subjective and objective data to organize semantic groups for vocabulary teaching, as a result, made it possible for students to learn well-motiovated vocabulary with efficiency.
    2) As the result of vocabulary teaching after selecting basic vocabulary and its association groups, the separation feature between stimulus words and and response words tended to decrease while the association of the words of hish similarity and opposition was strengthened.
    3) When the vocabulary teaching was well matched with the syntatic, semantic and pragmatic viewpoints, students could get higher interest in the contexts and additional concepts of the vocabulary.
    4) When the teaching followed the guidance process and the guide book discussed here as well as the methods of association drills and the formation of relation conception and semantic groups, there was a considerable increase in the vocabulary and the command of sentences or utterances.
    5) In comparison with the control class, the experimental class had weaker separation feature through the reduction of the total number of and the types of association words, and had higher semantic and vocabulary concentration ratios.
    6) To sum up the responses of the questionnaire, a) vocabulary teaching should be done under the systematic guidance system, b) vocabulary learning by way of the motivation in semantic groups is both economical and productive, c) vocabulary instruction is meaningful in its active exercise for the purpose of actual usage, d) to distinguish lexical meaning from contextual meaning with much emphasis on the latter is absolutely necessary in vocabulary teachings, and e) vocabulary can be synthetically comprehended by mixing the viewpoints of lexical semantics, syntactic semantics and pragmatics.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목차 = ⅰ
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구 목적 = 1
    • 2. 연구 방법 = 2
    • Ⅱ. 본론 = 4
    • 목차 = ⅰ
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구 목적 = 1
    • 2. 연구 방법 = 2
    • Ⅱ. 본론 = 4
    • 1. 어휘 지도의 목표 = 4
    • 가. 셰마(schema) 형성과 산출 기능 = 5
    • 나. 연상군(association group) 조직 = 6
    • (1) 관계 개념의 형성 = 6
    • (2) 연상 실습 = 7
    • (3) 의미 집단 형성 = 11
    • 2. 실태 분석 = 15
    • 3. 연구의 실제 = 18
    • 가. 희망 어휘의 의미 집단별 분류 = 18
    • 나. 교과서 어휘의 의미 집단별 분류 = 19
    • 다. 지도 절차 = 20
    • 라. 지도안 = 22
    • 4. 적용 효과 = 25
    • 가. 어휘력 검증 = 25
    • 나. 설문지 조사 = 32
    • Ⅲ. 결론 = 43
    • 참고문헌 = 45
    • Abstract = 47
    • 부록 = 49
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼