가족체계유형과 대학생의 자아분화의 관계 = (The) relationship between family system types and self-differentiation in college students

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study was to identify the relationship between Family System Types and Self-Differentiation. Specific research questions for this purpose were as follows :
1. To what extent do the cohesion and adaptability of the family influence self-differentiation in the person?
2. To what extent do the family system types influence self-differentiation in the person?
3. To what extent does perceived-ideal discrepancy in the family influence self-differentiation in the person?
The subjects were 229 males and 323 female students attending three universities in Pusan.
The instruments used were a family system evaluation scale (Family Cohesion and Adaptability Evaluation Scale : FACES Ⅱ) revised by Lim (1984) and the questionaire on Self-Differentiation compiled by Je(1989).
The data collected was analyzed by the following method: t-test, one way ANOVA, ANCOVA, and Correlation, All the analyses were done by the SPSS program for personal computer.
Major findings from this study are summarized as follows:
1. The degree of self-differentiation is the difference between families classified according to cohesion. But the hypothesis 1-1 was not sustained, because the degree of self-differentiation is in direct relationship to the family´s being enmeshed, connected, separated, or disengaged.
2. The degree of self-differentiation is the difference between families classified according to adaptibility. But hypothesis 1-2 was not sustained, because the degree of self-differentiation is in direct relationship to the family´s being of chaotic, flexible, structured, or rigid.
3. According to the three kinds of family system types, the degree of self-differentiation is the different. But hypothesis 2 was not sustained, because the degree of self-differentiation is in direct relationship to the family´s being mid-ranged, balanced, or extreme.
4. The more the perceived-ideal discrepancy in the family system is high, the less the degree of self-differentiation is low. Thus the hypothesis 3 was supported.
Therefore the conclusions of this study were as follows:
1. The more cohesion and adaptability are high, the more the degree of self-differentiation is high. Thus when the function and health of Korean families were tested by Olson´s Circumplex Model, the cultural difference had to be considered.
2. The more positive thinking and satisfaction about one´s family are high, the more the degree of self-differentiation is high.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차
• Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
• 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
• 2. 연구문제 = 6
• 3. 연구가설 = 6
• 4. 연구의 제한점 = 7
• Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 8
• 1.가족체계이론 = 8
• 2.Bowen의 이론 = 10
• (1)핵가족 정서체계 = 11
• (2)자아분화 = 12
• (3)가족정서체계와 자아분화 = 13
• 3.Olson의 복합순환 모델 = 14
• (1)가족 응집력 = 17
• (2)가족 적응력 = 17
• Ⅲ. 연구방법 및 절차 = 19
• 1.연구모형 = 19
• 2.연구대상 = 20
• 3.측정도구 = 21
• 4.연구절차 = 21
• 5.자료의 분석 = 22
• Ⅳ. 연구결과 해석 및 논의 = 23
• 1.결과 해석 = 24
• 2.논의 = 33
• Ⅴ. 요약 및 결론 = 38
• 1.요약 = 38
• 2.결론 및 제언 = 39
• 참고문헌 = 41
• 부록 = 47
• 영문초록 = 52