RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    CEO 리더십 유형과 직무역량이 조직문화를 매개로 조직성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Influence of CEO Leadership Type and Job Competence on Organizational Performance through Organizational Culture as a Mediator

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T14563375

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    연구의 동기는 글로벌 경기침체와 장기 저성장의 뉴노멀 시기를 맞아 기업경영에 어려움을 겪고 있는 중소기업의 경쟁력 확보를 조직문화에서 찾고자 하였다

    연구의 동기는 글로벌 경기침체와 장기 저성장의 뉴노멀 시기를 맞아 기업경영에 어려움을 겪고 있는 중소기업의 경쟁력 확보를 조직문화에서 찾고자 하였다

    더보기

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study analyzed the overall cause-and-effect relationship in the influence of CEO
    leadership type and job competence, and organizational culture on organizational
    performance.
    The characteristics of CEO leadership type were identified in terms of transactional
    leadership and transformational leadership, and the characteristics of job competence
    were identified by dividing it into management and individual effectiveness.
    Next, the characteristics of organizational culture were examined by dividing into
    agreement culture and development culture, hierarchical culture, and rationality
    culture, and finally, organizational performance was measured comprehensively
    through job satisfaction and organizational commitment.
    First, transactional leadership had a significant influence on rationality culture but
    not on agreement culture, development culture, and hierarchical culture. Also,
    transformational leadership had a significant influence on agreement culture,
    development culture, and hierarchical culture, but not on rationality culture.
    Second, management had a significant influence on rationality culture, but it did
    not on agreement culture, development culture, and hierarchical culture. Individual effectiveness had a significant influence on development culture and hierarchical
    culture, but it did not on agreement culture and rationality culture.
    Third, agreement culture had an influence on job satisfaction and organizational
    commitment, and development culture had a significant influence on job satisfaction
    but it did on organizational commitment. Hierarchical culture had a significant
    influence on job satisfaction but not on organizational commitment. Finally,
    rationality culture had a significant influence on job satisfaction and organizational
    commitment.
    In conclusion, this research verified and suggested the influence of CEO leadership
    type, job competence, and organizational culture on organizational performance
    through an integrated analysis result.
    번역하기

    This study analyzed the overall cause-and-effect relationship in the influence of CEO leadership type and job competence, and organizational culture on organizational performance. The characteristics of CEO leadership type were identified in terms of ...

    This study analyzed the overall cause-and-effect relationship in the influence of CEO
    leadership type and job competence, and organizational culture on organizational
    performance.
    The characteristics of CEO leadership type were identified in terms of transactional
    leadership and transformational leadership, and the characteristics of job competence
    were identified by dividing it into management and individual effectiveness.
    Next, the characteristics of organizational culture were examined by dividing into
    agreement culture and development culture, hierarchical culture, and rationality
    culture, and finally, organizational performance was measured comprehensively
    through job satisfaction and organizational commitment.
    First, transactional leadership had a significant influence on rationality culture but
    not on agreement culture, development culture, and hierarchical culture. Also,
    transformational leadership had a significant influence on agreement culture,
    development culture, and hierarchical culture, but not on rationality culture.
    Second, management had a significant influence on rationality culture, but it did
    not on agreement culture, development culture, and hierarchical culture. Individual effectiveness had a significant influence on development culture and hierarchical
    culture, but it did not on agreement culture and rationality culture.
    Third, agreement culture had an influence on job satisfaction and organizational
    commitment, and development culture had a significant influence on job satisfaction
    but it did on organizational commitment. Hierarchical culture had a significant
    influence on job satisfaction but not on organizational commitment. Finally,
    rationality culture had a significant influence on job satisfaction and organizational
    commitment.
    In conclusion, this research verified and suggested the influence of CEO leadership
    type, job competence, and organizational culture on organizational performance
    through an integrated analysis result.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서 론 ····················································································································1
    • 1. 연구 동기와 목적 ··························································································1
    • 2. 연구의 범위 및 방법····················································································3
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 ·······································································································4
    • 1. 리더십의 개념과 유형··················································································4
    • Ⅰ. 서 론 ····················································································································1
    • 1. 연구 동기와 목적 ··························································································1
    • 2. 연구의 범위 및 방법····················································································3
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 ·······································································································4
    • 1. 리더십의 개념과 유형··················································································4
    • 2. 직무역량 ··········································································································9
    • 3. 조직문화 ········································································································13
    • 4. 조직성과 ········································································································20
    • 5. 선행연구 ········································································································23
    • Ⅲ. 연구의 설계 ·····································································································29
    • 1. 연구모형 ········································································································29
    • 2. 가설설정 ········································································································30
    • 3. 변수의 조작적 정의····················································································31
    • 4. 설문의 구성 ··································································································35
    • Ⅳ. 실증분석 ············································································································37
    • 1. 표본특성 ········································································································37
    • 2. 측정변수의 신뢰성과 타당성····································································39
    • 3. 구조방정식 모형분석과 연구가설 검증 ··················································50
    • Ⅴ. 결론 ····················································································································62
    • 1. 연구결과 요약 및 시사점 ········································································62
    • 2. 연구의 한계와 후속 연구··········································································63
    • 참고문헌 ···················································································································64
    • 설문지 ·······················································································································68
    • Abstract ····················································································································75
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1. 장기요양기관의 조직성과모형 :말콤 볼드리지 모델의 적용, 이은영, 이화여자대학 교 대학원 박사학위논문, , 2013

    2. 조직문화, 구조, 경영전략이 조직성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구, 이명자, 창원대학교, 창원대 학교 대학원 박사학위논문, , 2014

    3. 기업가정신과 조직문화가 조직유효성에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구,, 김상용, 용인대 학교 대학원 박사학위논문, , 2008

    4. “조직문화와 경영전략이 조직유효성에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구”, 이동기, 용인대학 교 대학원 박사학위논문, , 2012

    5. 식기업 차별화 전략이 분권화 수준에 따른 기업성과에 미치는 영향 연 구, 정수식, 경기대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, , 2011

    6. 조직변화에서 구성원의 자아표현이 조직성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구, 배선진, 숙명여자대학교 대학원, 숙명여자대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, , 2014

    7. 대학 행정직원의 역량모델 개발과 역량수준 분석 : A 국립대학교 중심으 로, 남순란, 충북대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, , 2015

    8. 조직문화와 조직유효성과의 관계 연구–공유리더십의 조 절효과를 중심으로, 김영헌, 경희대학교 대학원, 경희대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, , 2014

    9. 호텔기업 최고경영자의 리더십 유형이 조직문화와 직무안정성에 미치는 영향, 함봉균, 순천향대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, , 2007

    10. 호텔 직원 핵심역량과 채용평가 항목의 상관관계를 통한 채용평가기준의 개발, 이수희, 세종대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, , 2012

    1. 장기요양기관의 조직성과모형 :말콤 볼드리지 모델의 적용, 이은영, 이화여자대학 교 대학원 박사학위논문, , 2013

    2. 조직문화, 구조, 경영전략이 조직성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구, 이명자, 창원대학교, 창원대 학교 대학원 박사학위논문, , 2014

    3. 기업가정신과 조직문화가 조직유효성에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구,, 김상용, 용인대 학교 대학원 박사학위논문, , 2008

    4. “조직문화와 경영전략이 조직유효성에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구”, 이동기, 용인대학 교 대학원 박사학위논문, , 2012

    5. 식기업 차별화 전략이 분권화 수준에 따른 기업성과에 미치는 영향 연 구, 정수식, 경기대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, , 2011

    6. 조직변화에서 구성원의 자아표현이 조직성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구, 배선진, 숙명여자대학교 대학원, 숙명여자대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, , 2014

    7. 대학 행정직원의 역량모델 개발과 역량수준 분석 : A 국립대학교 중심으 로, 남순란, 충북대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, , 2015

    8. 조직문화와 조직유효성과의 관계 연구–공유리더십의 조 절효과를 중심으로, 김영헌, 경희대학교 대학원, 경희대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, , 2014

    9. 호텔기업 최고경영자의 리더십 유형이 조직문화와 직무안정성에 미치는 영향, 함봉균, 순천향대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, , 2007

    10. 호텔 직원 핵심역량과 채용평가 항목의 상관관계를 통한 채용평가기준의 개발, 이수희, 세종대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, , 2012

    11. 청소년수련시설 기관장의 리더십유형이 조직효과성에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구, 최은규, 선문대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, , 2008

    12. 고객관계프로세스 분석에 의한 영업직원의 역량요인 도출과 직무만족 향 상 방안, 황창환, 건국대학교 대학원, 건국대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, , 2011

    13. 공기업 CEO의 리더십 유형이 조직구성원의 리더신뢰와 조직유효성에 미 치는 영향, 한태진, 호서대학교 벤처전문대학원, 호서대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, , 2009

    14. 클리어 리더십이 조직의 관리자에 대한 신뢰와 조직의 신뢰분위기에 미치 는 영향, 조영덕, 경희대학교 일반대학원, 경희대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, , 2014

    15. 공공조직 조직성과의 결정요인에 관한 연구: 공직동기, 신분불안, 직무만족을 중심으로, 이희선, 신황용, 서울대학교 한국행정연구소, 한양대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, , 2012

    16. “리더-구성원 간 교환관계(LMX)가 팀웍, 직무만족, 조 직몰입에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구,”, 석봉인, 서경대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, , 2014

    17. 중소기업 영업직원의 역량이 영업성과에 미치는 영향 - 직무만족, 조직몰 입의 매개효과 중심으로, 최유한, 중앙대학교 대학원, 중앙대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, , 2015

    18. 조직문화, 창의적 리더십, 자아개념, 창의적 문제해결력의 조직유형별 차이 및 각 변인이 창의적 문제해결력에 미치는 영향, 임제헌, 숭실대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, , 2014

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼