대학생의 미래지향목표, 근접하위목표, 과제도구성지각 및 자기조절전략간의 구조적 관계

국문 초록 (Abstract)

자기주도적이고 창의적인 인간을 요구하는 현대 사회에서 목표를 세우고 달성하기까지 스스로 학습하는 학습에서의 자기조절에 대한 관심이 고조되고 있다. 이에 따라 동기가 자기조절전략에 미치는 영향에 관한 많은 연구들이 수행되어 왔지만, 대부분의 연구는 단기적인 동기 주제와 자기조절전략과의 관계에 초점을 두고 있고 잠재적으로 중요한 영향을 미치는 미래지향목표와의 관계에 대한 연구는 거의 없었다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 미래지향목표와 자기조절전략 간의 관계를 가정하고 이를 매개하는 변인으로 근접하위목표와 과제도구성지각을 설정하여 구조적 관계를 검증하고자 한다.
이러한 연구의 목적을 달성하기 위해 대학생용 미래지향목표 척도를 번안하여 타당화하였으며, 이론적·경험적 틀을 기초로 하여 미래지향목표, 근접하위목표, 과제도구성지각 및 자기조절전략 간의 구조적 관계모형을 설정하고 변인간의 관계를 검증하였다. 그리고 최종 모형이 학년별, 성별 모두 동일하게 적용될 수 있는지를 알아보았다. 본 연구의 구체적인 연구문제는 다음과 같다.
연구문제 1. 대학생용 미래지향목표 척도는 타당하고 신뢰로운가?
연구문제 2. 미래지향목표, 근접하위목표, 과제도구성지각 및 자기조절전략 간의 구조적 관계는 어떠한가?
연구문제 3. 학년 및 성별에 따라 미래지향목표, 근접하위목표, 과제도구성지각 및 자기조절전략 간의 구조적 관계는 동일한가?
연구문제와 관련된 주요 연구결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다.
연구문제 1을 해결하기 위해 대학생용 미래지향목표 척도의 타당도와 신뢰도를 확인하였다. 예비검사를 통한 최종문항에 대해 탐색적 요인분석과 확인적 요인분석을 실시한 결과 5문항씩 6개의 하위요인을 확인할 수 있었고 고차 확인적 요인분석 모형 검증을 실시한 결과 미래지향목표는 3개의 하위요인(개인성장지향, 관계지향, 지역사회지향)은 내재적 미래지향목표로, 나머지 3개의 하위요인(부지향, 명성지향, 이미지지향)은 외재적 미래지향목표로 구분되는 2차 위계모형임을 확인하였다. 미래지향목표 척도는 적절한 수준의 준거타당도를 지니고 있었으며 문항들이 신뢰로운 것으로 확인되었다.
연구문제 2를 해결하기 위해서는 2단계 분석방법을 적용하여 먼저 측정모형의 적합도와 타당도를 확인한 후, 구조적 관계모형의 경로를 분석하였다. 연구결과를 살펴보면, 첫째, 미래지향목표는 근접하위목표에 영향을 주고 근접하위목표는 과제도구성지각에 영향을 주며 과제도구성지각은 자기조절전략에 순차적으로 직접적인 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 미래지향목표와 근접하위목표는 과제도구성지각을 매개로 하여 자기조절전략에 간접적인 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 내재적 미래지향목표가 외재적 미래지향목표보다 근접하위목표, 과제도구성지각, 자기조절전략에 직·간접적으로 더 큰 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다.
연구문제 3을 해결하기 위해서는 최종 구조적 관계모형이 학년별(1, 2학년 vs. 3, 4학년) 그리고 성별(남 vs. 여)에 따라 동일한지를 알아보기 위해 두 집단 간 비율을 고려하여 각 집단별 200명씩을 무선표집하여 다중집단분석을 실시하였다. 그 결과, 본 연구의 최종 구조적 관계모형은 학년 및 성별 집단 모두 동일하게 적용할 수 있는 것으로 나타났다.
이상의 연구결과는 다음의 세 가지 측면에서 의의가 있다.
첫째, 지금까지의 자기조절전략에 대한 연구는 주로 근접동기와 관련된 것으로 잠재적으로 중요한 미래지향목표를 배제해왔다. 그러나 본 연구는 학업상황에서 미래지향목표, 근접하위목표, 과제도구성지각 그리고 자기조절전략의 인과적 관계에 대한 구체적인 가설을 검증하였고 이를 일반화할 수 있는지를 검토하였다. 이러한 결과는 미래지향목표와 현재의 학습에서의 자기조절전략 간의 관계를 설정함으로써 미래지향목표가 자기조절전략의 사용에 영향을 주는 과정에 대한 이론적 기초를 제공해주고, 미래지향목표와 근접동기에 대한 연구가 통합되어야 한다는 주장(Husman & Lens, 1999; Kauffman & Husman, 2004)을 지지해주어 목표 관련 연구의 확장에 기여한다는 점에서 이론적 측면에서의 의의가 있다.
둘째, 미래지향목표와 근접동기의 관계에 대한 이론적 지지는 탄탄하지만 이와 관련된 실증적 연구는 부족한 편이다. 본 연구는 변인들 간의 인과적 관계를 검증하는 방법으로 구조방정식 모형의 적합성을 확인함으로써 구조적 관계모형 속에서 그 중요성을 경험적으로 검증하였다. 뿐만 아니라 변인들 간의 직·간접 효과를 밝힘으로써 변인들 간의 관계를 명확하게 해석할 수 있도록 하였다는 점에서 방법론적인 측면에서의 의의가 있다.
셋째, 실제적 측면에서 볼 때, 학생들에게 미래지향목표와 근접하위목표를 명확히 하도록 하고, 그들의 학업을 자신의 목표를 성취하는데 도구적이라고 지각하도록 돕는 것이 자기조절전략 사용에 긍정적 영향을 줄 수 있음을 밝힘으로써 수업과 상담에서 뿐 아니라 학습개선 프로그램 개발에 새로운 시각을 제공하였다는데 의의가 있다.

The purpose of this study is to test the structural relationship among university students' future-oriented goals, proximal subgoals, perceived task instrumentality, and self-regulation strategies. To accomplish this end, the future-oriented goals scale was translated and validated. And the model that future-oriented goals affect self-regulation strategies through proximal subgoals and perceived task instrumentality was tested by structural equation modeling analysis. Also it was confirmed that final model could be identically applied regardless school grade and gender. The specific questions are as follows.
1) Is the future-oriented goals scale confident and valid?
2) How is the structural relationship among university students' future-oriented goals, proximal subgoals, perceived task instrumentality, and self-regulation strategies?
3) Is the same the structural relationship among university students' future-oriented goals, proximal subgoals, perceived task instrumentality, and self-regulation strategies by school grade and gender?
The results of this study are as follows.
In order to solve the first question, the future-oriented goals scale was translated and validated. From the results of the confirmatory factor analysis and the high confirmatory factor analysis, it was determined that the future-oriented goals scale consists of 6 factors each 5 items. which consisted of intrinsic goals(personal growth, relationships, and community) and extrinsic goals(wealth, fame, image). It was a good criteria for validity and reliability.
In order to solve the second question, it was applied in a two-step approach. the goodness-of-fit and validity of measurement model was investigated and then the structural relations model was analysed. The results of the study are as follows. First, students' future-oriented goals affect their proximal subgoals, their proximal subgoals affect their perceptions of task instrumentality, and their perceptions of task instrumentality, in turn, affects self-regulation strategies directly. Second, future-oriented goals and proximal subgoals affect self-regulation strategies through perceived task instrumentality indirectly. Third, intrinsic future-oriented goals affect proximal subgoals, perceived task instrumentality, self-regulation strategies more than extrinsic future-oriented goals.
In order to solve the third question, a multi-group analysis was performed random sampling 200 students per group. The final structural relations model results were the same between verified modeling groups.
The above results have three educational meanings as follows.
First, many contemporary works have focused on short-term motivational and self-reguatory issues and have excluded potentially important future goals. In this study, the specific hypothesis about causal relations in the future-oriented goals, proximal subgoals, perceived task instrumentality, and self-regulation strategies in an academic environment were tested. This result provided a theoretical basis about how the future-oriented goals affect self-regulation strategies.
Second, the theoretical support on the relation between the future-oriented goals and proximal motivation is strong, but experimental studies are scarce. This study can be meaningful in verifying relations among variables clearly by structural equation modeling.
Finally, the results of this study suggests that a teacher would benefit in emphasizing intrinsic future-oriented goals in teaching and counseling, which will help in a learning development program.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study is to test the structural relationship among university students' future-oriented goals, proximal subgoals, perceived task instrumentality, and self-regulation strategies. To accomplish this end, the future-oriented goals scale was translated and validated. And the model that future-oriented goals affect self-regulation strategies through proximal subgoals and perceived task instrumentality was tested by structural equation modeling analysis. Also it was confirmed that final model could be identically applied regardless school grade and gender. The specific questions are as follows.

1) Is the future-oriented goals scale confident and valid?
2) How is the structural relationship among university students' future-oriented goals, proximal subgoals, perceived task instrumentality, and self-regulation strategies?
3) Is the same the structural relationship among university students' future-oriented goals, proximal subgoals, perceived task instrumentality, and self-regulation strategies by school grade and gender?

The results of this study are as follows.
In order to solve the first question, the future-oriented goals scale was translated and validated. From the results of the confirmatory factor analysis and the high confirmatory factor analysis, it was determined that the future-oriented goals scale consists of 6 factors each 5 items. which consisted of intrinsic goals(personal growth, relationships, and community) and extrinsic goals(wealth, fame, image). It was a good criteria for validity and reliability.
In order to solve the second question, it was applied in a two-step approach. the goodness-of-fit and validity of measurement model was investigated and then the structural relations model was analysed. The results of the study are as follows. First, students' future-oriented goals affect their proximal subgoals, their proximal subgoals affect their perceptions of task instrumentality, and their perceptions of task instrumentality, in turn, affects self-regulation strategies directly. Second, future-oriented goals and proximal subgoals affect self-regulation strategies through perceived task instrumentality indirectly. Third, intrinsic future-oriented goals affect proximal subgoals, perceived task instrumentality, self-regulation strategies more than extrinsic future-oriented goals.
In order to solve the third question, a multi-group analysis was performed random sampling 200 students per group. The final structural relations model results were the same between verified modeling groups.
The above results have three educational meanings as follows.
First, many contemporary works have focused on short-term motivational and self-reguatory issues and have excluded potentially important future goals. In this study, the specific hypothesis about causal relations in the future-oriented goals, proximal subgoals, perceived task instrumentality, and self-regulation strategies in an academic environment were tested. This result provided a theoretical basis about how the future-oriented goals affect self-regulation strategies.
Second, the theoretical support on the relation between the future-oriented goals and proximal motivation is strong, but experimental studies are scarce. This study can be meaningful in verifying relations among variables clearly by structural equation modeling.
Finally, the results of this study suggests that a teacher would benefit in emphasizing intrinsic future-oriented goals in teaching and counseling, which will help in a learning development program.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서 론 = 1
• 1. 연구의 필요성 = 1
• 2. 연구의 목적 = 6
• 3. 연구문제 = 7
• Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 9
• 1. 미래지향목표 = 9
• 2. 근접하위목표 = 14
• 3. 과제도구성지각 = 16
• 4. 자기조절전략 = 17
• 5. 미래지향목표, 근접하위목표, 과제도구성지각, 자기조절전략 간의 관계 = 19
• 6. 연구모형 = 25
• Ⅲ. 연구방법 = 28
• 1. 연구대상 = 28
• 2. 측정도구 = 30
• 3. 분석방법 = 36
• Ⅳ. 연구결과 = 38
• 1. 미래지향목표 척도의 타당화 결과 = 38
• 2. 미래지향목표, 근접하위목표, 과제도구성지각 및 자기조절전략 간의 구조적 관계 분석 결과 = 53
• 3. 학년 및 성별에 따른 미래지향목표, 근접하위목표, 과제도구성지각 및 자기조절전략 간의 구조적 관계모형의 동일성 검증 결과 = 74
• Ⅴ. 논의 = 79
• Ⅵ. 결론 = 85
• 1. 결론 = 85
• 2. 제언 = 90

참고문헌 (Reference)

1. AMOSA toZ, 김대업, AMOS A TO Z, , 2008

2. Possible selves, Nurius, Markus, , 1986

3. AspirationsIndex, Kasser, Ryan, , 2004

4. Self-regulationscale, Diehl, Schwarzer, Schmitz, , 1999

5. 알기쉬운 통계분석, 성태제, 알기 쉬운 통계분석, , 2007

6. Psychometric theory,2nd ed, Nunally,J.C, , 1978

7. Handbook of self-regulation, Boekaerts, Monique, Academic Press, Handbookofself-regulation, , 2005

8. Life goals and vocationalchoice, Astin, Nichols, , 1964

9. Adolescent's theories of education, Patashnick, Nicholls, Nolen, , 1985

10. Introduction to measurement theory, Allen, Mary J, Brooks/Cole Pub. Co., Introduction to measurementtheory, , 1979

11. Goalachievement:Theroleofintentions, Gollwitzer, , 1993

12. Personality and social intelligence, Cantor, Nancy, Prentice-Hall, , 1987

13. Measuring and assessing organization, Ferry, Ven de Ven, Measuring andassessing organization, , 1980

14. Alternative ways of assessing modelfit, Brown, Cudeck, Alternative ways ofassessing modelfit, , 1993

15. Theautomaticpursuitand managementofgoals, Shah, , 2005

16. Goal-setting andtask performance: 1969-1980, Locke, , 1980

17. Emotionalregulation and emotionaldevelopment, Thompson, Emotional regulation and emotionaldevelopment, , 1991

18. The role of the future in student motivation, Husman, Lens, Theroleofthe future in studentmotivation, , 1999

19. A theory of goal setting and task performance, Locke, E. A., A TheoryofGoalSettingandTaskPerformance, , 1990

20. 자기결정성이론과 현장 적용 연구, 김아영 ( Ay Young Kim ), 한국교육심리학회, "교육심리연구, , 2010

21. Emotions and self-regulation duringtest taking, Schutz, Davis, , 2000

22. 심리검사 번안에 대한 통합적 접근, 손원숙, , 2003

23. Sketches for a self-determination theory ofvalues, Kasser, , 2004

24. Towards a theory of task motivation andincentives, Locke, , 1968

25. Goal importanceself-focus,andthegoal-settingprocess, Hollenbeck, Williams, "Goal importanceself-focus, , 1987

26. Enhancing student motivation: A school-wide approach, Midgley, Maehr, , 1991

27. Possible Selves: PersonalizedRepresentations of Goals, Markus, A.Ruvolo, , 1989

28. A longitudinalstudy ofthehopesand worriesofadolescents, Gillies, , 1989

29. A modeloffuture-orientedmotivation and self-regulation, Miller, Brickman, , 2004

30. Krumboltz's learning theoryofcareerchoiceandcounseling, Mitchell, Krumboltz, , 1996

31. Self-regulated learning: current and future directions, Montalvo, Torres, Self-regulatedlearning: current and future directions, , 2004

32. Future orientation in the study ofachievementmotivation, Raynor, , 1974

33. Lifegoalsmattertohappiness:A revision ofset-pointtheory, Heady, , 2008

34. New developments in anddirectionsforgoal-settingresearch, La tham, Locke, , 2007

35. 2×2 성취목표지향성 척도의 개발 및 타당화, 박병기 ( Byung Gee Bak ), 이종욱 ( Jong Ug Lee ), 한국교육심리학회, 2×2성취목표지향성 척도의 개발 및 타당화, , 2005

36. Assessmentinthe evaluation ofself-regulation as a process, Cascallar, Costigan, , 2006

37. A daily diary studyof goals and affective wellbeing at work, Daniels, Harris, Briner, , 2003

38. A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning, Zimmermann, A socialcognitiveview ofself-regulatedacademiclearning, , 1989

39. 미래지향적 목표의 검사도구 개발 및 타당화, 문병상, , 2011

40. Genderand orientationstoward the future: links to motivation, Greene, , 2004

41. Achieving self-regulation: The trialand triumph of adolescence, Zimmerman, , 2002

42. Goal constructs in psychology: Structure process and content,??, Austin, J.B.Vancouver, "Goal constructs inpsychology:structureprocess, , 1996

43. Toward a motivationalandstructural theory of ruminative thought, Martin, Tesser, , 1989

44. Perceivedinstrumentality and academics: The link to task valuing, DeBacker, Greene, Miller, , 1999

45. Social foundations of thought and action : a social cognitive theory, Bandura, Albert, Prentice-Hall, Socialfoundations ofthoughtand action:Asocial cognitive theory, , 1986

46. Lifegoalsapproachesto studyand performance in an undergraduate cohort, Wilding, Andrews, , 2006

47. 2*2 성취목표지향성과 자기조절학습과의 관련성 검토, 양명희 ( Myong Hee Yang ), 오종철 ( Jong Chul Oh ), 한국교육심리학회, 2×2성취목표지향성과 자기조절학습과의 관련성검토, , 2006

48. The impact ofsociocultural context on future goals and self-regulation, Miller, Brickman, , 2001

49. Motivation, planning and action: A relational theory of behavior dynamics, Nuttin, "Motivation Planning, , 1984

50. Self-efficacy and academiclearning: Self-efficacy enhancing interventions, Schunk, Ertmer, , 2000

51. How future goalsenhance motivation and learning in multiculturalclassrooms, Phalet, Andriessen, Lens, , 2004

52. Advanced educational psychology for educators, researchers, and policymakers, Pressley, Michael, HarperCollins College Publishers, "Advanced educationalpsychology: For educators researchers, , 1995

53. Placing motivationand future time perspective theory in a temporalperspective, Lens, Lacante, Simons, Vansteenkiste, Placing motivation and future time perspective theory in atemporalperspective, , 2004

54. Identifyingthecauses of differentialitem functioning in translated verbalitems, Allalouf, Hambleton, Sireci, , 1999

55. Effects oftimeperspectiveon student motivation: Introduction to a special issue, Kauffman, , 2004

56. Assessingattentioncontrolingoalpursuit:A componentofdispositionalself-regulation, Schwarzer, Diehl, , 2006

57. The relationbetween self-beliefs and academic achievement: Ameta-analytic review, DuBois, Valentine, Cooper, , 2004

58. Self-regulated learning and academic achievement : theory, research, and practice, Zimmerman, Barry J, Springer-Verlag, "Self-regulatedlearning and academic achievement: Theoryresearch, , 1989

59. 미래목표성취목표지향성과 자기조절학습의 인과적 관계 분석, 문병상, , 2011

60. Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed.), Zimmerman, Schunk, Self-regulatedlearning and academic achievement: Theoreticalperspectives(2nded), , 2001

61. Achievementgoalsandintrinsicmotivation:Coherenceconcordance,andachievementorientation, Durik, "Achievementgoalsandintrinsicmotivation:Coherenceconcordance, , 2003

62. An Exploratory Examination of Person-Organization Fit: Organizational Goal Congruence, Vancouver, An exploratoryexamination of person-organization fit: Organizational goalcongruence, , 1991

63. Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance, Pintrich,P.R., , 1990

64. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two??step approach, Anderson, Gerbing, Structural equationmodeling in practice:A review and recommended two-stepapproach, , 1988

65. Increasing similarity in the values and lifeplans of male and female college students?, Fiorentine, , 1988

66. Measuring one component ofdispositionalself-regulation:attention controlin goalpursuit, Schwarzer, , 2004

67. Achievement goalorientations and self-regulation in writing: An integrative perspective, Gorodetsky, Lichtinger, Kaplan, , 2009

68. Thejointeffectsoftargetand purpose goals on intrinsic motivation: A mediationalanalysis, Elliot, Harackiewicz, , 1998

69. 초등아동의 자기조절학습에 관여하는 인지 및 동기의 개인차 연구, 박승호, 한국교육심리학회, , 1999

70. 초등학생의 자기결정성 동기자기조절학습,학업성취 간의 구조분석, 유경훈(Kyoung Hoon Lew), 최병연, 교육문화연구회, "초등학생의 자기결정성 동기자기조절학습, , 2010

71. Wanting tohaveversuswanting to be:The effectofperceived instrumentality ongoal orientation, Lens, Dewitte, Simons, , 2000

72. Interferenceand inhibitionin cognition and behavior:Unifying themes for educationpsychology, Dempster, Corkill, , 1999

73. Perceivingschoolperformanceasinstrumentaltofuturegoalattainment:Effectson gradedperformance, Malka, Covington, , 2005

74. Disentangling achievement orientation and goal setting: Effects on self-regulatory processes, Kozlowski, B.S.Bell, , 2006

75. Thinking aboutand acting upon the future:Developmentoffuture orientation across the lifespan, Nurmi, , 2005

76. How doadolescentsseetheirfuture?A reviewof the development of future orientation and planning, Nurmi, , 1991

77. A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning incollege students, Pintrich, A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self regulated learning in college students, , 2004

78. Effects of Different Types of Practice in Cross-Cultural Test Adaptation of Affective Measures, Lim, Eun-Young, Kim, Ah-Young, 한국심리학회, , 2003

79. Further examining the American dream: Differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals, Ryan, Kasser, Further examining theAmerican dream: Differential correlates of intrinsic andextrinsic goals, , 1996

80. Influencing children'sself-efficacy and self-regulation of reading and writingthrough modeling, Zimmerman, Schunk, , 2007

81. Relationships between achievement-related motives, future orientation and academic performance, Raynor, "Relationships between achievement-relatedmotives future orientation, , 1970

82. A dark side of the American dream: Correlates of financial success as a central life aspiration, Ryan, Kasser, A dark sideoftheAmericandream: Correlates of financialsuccess as a centrallifeaspiration, , 1993

83. Self-determinationtheoryandthefacilitation of intrinsic motivationsocialdevelopment,andwell-bing, Ryan, Deci, "Self-determinationtheoryandthefacilitation of intrinsic motivationsocialdevelopment, , 2000

84. Self?regulation of mood: Strategies for changing a bad mood, raising energy, and reducing tension, T.M.McClain, John Robert Newman, Thayer, "Self-regulationofmood:Strategiesforchangingabadmoodraisingenergy, , 1994

85. Intuition,affect,and personality:unconscious coherence judgments and self-regulation ofnegative affect, Kuhl, Baumann, "Intuition, , 2002

86. Performance deficit followinguncontrollablefailure:Impaired action controlorgeneralizedexpectancy deficit, Weiss, Kuhl, , 1994

87. Engagementin academic work:Therole oflearning goalsfuture consequences,pleasing others,and perceived ability, Nichols, "Engagementin academic work:Therole oflearning goalsfuture consequences, , 1996

88. Don’tdoitforme.Doitfor yourself!”Stressing the personalrelevance enhancesmotivation in physical education, Lens, Simons, , 2003

89. Be careful what you wish for: Optimal functioning and the relative attainment of intrinsic and extrinsic goals, Ryan, Kasser, Becarefulwhatyou wish for:Optimal functioning and the relative attainment ofintrinsic and extrinsic goals, , 2001

90. Inherentassociationbetween academic delay of gratification future timeperspective, and self-regulated learning, Karabenick, Bembenutty, "Inherentassociationbetween academic delay of gratification future timeperspective, , 2004

91. Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives, Bentler, P. M., Hu, L.-T., LAWRENCE ERLBAUM MODELING, Cutoffcriteria forfitindexesincovariance structure analysis :Conventionalcriteria versusnew alternatives, , 1999

92. Investigating self-regulation andmotivation: historical background methodologicaldevelopments,and future prospects, Zimmerman, "Investigating self-regulation andmotivation: historical background methodologicaldevelopments, , 2008

93. 성공,실패 피드백에 따른 자기효능감과 과제선택권이 과제흥미와 귀인에 미치는 효과, 소연희 ( Yeon Hee So ), 김성일 ( Sung Il Kim ), 한국교육심리학회, , 2006

94. Student differences in self-regulated learning : Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use, Zimmermman, Pons, "Studentdifferencesinself-regulatedlearning:Relating gradesex, , 1990

95. The development of Competencebeliefs, expectancies for success, and achievement values fromchildhood through adolescence, Wigfield, Eccles, Thedevelopmentofcompetencebeliefsexpectanciesforsuccessandachievementvaluesfromchildhood through adolescence, , 2002

96. Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation, Lens, Deci, Vansteenkiste, Vansteenkiste, M., Intrinsicversusextrinsicgoalcontents in self-determination theory:Anotherlook at the quality of academic motivation, , 2006

97. Theimpactoffuturegoalsonstudents'proximal subgoals and on their perceptions of taskinstrumentality (Doctoral dissertation, Tabachnick, , 2005

98. Predicting high school students' cognitiveengagement and achievement: Contributions of classroomperceptions and motivation, Greene, , 2004

99. A life-span,life-space approach to careerdevelopment.InD.Brown& L.Brooks,etal.(Eds.),Careerchoice and development (2nd ed.), Super, "A life-span, , 1990

100. 중,고등학생의 학업적 자기효능감, 타인기대와 학업성취도 관계에서 자기조절학습전략의 효과, 류관열 ( Kwan Ryul Ryou ), 엄우용 ( Woo Yong Eom ), 최성열 ( Sung Yeol Choi ), 한국교육심리학회, "중고등학생의 학업적 자기효능감, , 2010

101. The role ofdifferenttypes ofinstrumentality in motivationstudy strategies,andperformance:Know whyyoulearn,soyou'llknow whatyoulearn!, Dewitte, Lens, Simons, "The role ofdifferenttypes ofinstrumentality in motivationstudy strategies, , 2004

102. Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: The synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy- supportive contexts, Deci, Lens, Vansteenkiste, Sheldon, Simons, "Motivating learningperformance, , 2004

103. TheRelationships Among Students' Future-Oriented Goals andSubgoalsPerceivedTask Instrumentality,andTask-OrientedSelf-Regulation Strategies in an Academic Environment, Miller, Relyea G.E, Tabachnick, "TheRelationships Among Students' Future-Oriented Goals andSubgoalsPerceivedTask Instrumentality, , 2008