RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    스포츠용품 평가에 대한 외재적 단서의 영향 = (The) effect of extrinsic cues of sporting goods on product evaluation

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T12416096

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to examine that identify the differences in perceived quality, perceived risk, perceived value, and purchase intention of three extrinsic cues of sporting goods (brand awareness, country-of-origin image, and perceived price), and that identify the differences between high and low levels which followed in the union extrinsic cues, that was to find out the effect of the causal relationship of the product evaluation factors which are caused by three extrinsic cues of sporting goods.
    A survey experimental research using between-subject factorial design was employed in order to develop eight types of extrinsic cues about selected products (high/low brand awareness x high/low country-of-origin image x perceived price). A subject evaluated only one type rather than all eight types because of avoiding the artificiality of the experimental results.
    The questionnaire for this study was disseminated to 1200 golfers from 20 golf driving ranges. 204 questionnaires were excluded because they were not applicable. There were 996 usable subjects (83%).
    In order to determine whether the questionnaire was valid and reliable, exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha coefficient were examined.
    To prove the hypothesis of the study based on the sampled data, structural equation modeling was conducted using the SPSSWIN 15.0 program and AMOS 7.0 program.
    The following was the results of this study. First, the results indicated that there were statistically significant differences in perceived quality, perceived risk, perceived value, and purchase intention between the levels of brand awareness, country-of-origin image, and perceived price. Second, the results indicated that there were statistically significant differences in perceived quality, perceived risk, perceived value, and purchase intention between the high and low levels which followed in the union extrinsic cues of brand awareness, country-of-origin image, and perceived price. Third, the results indicated that brand awareness, country-of-origin image, and perceived price was proved to have a positive effect on perceived quality. Fourth. the results indicated that brand awareness and country-of-origin image was proved to have a negative effect and perceived price was proved to have a positive effect on perceived risk. Fifth, the results indicated that brand awareness was proved to have a positive effect and perceived price was proved to have a negative effect on perceived risk.
    Lastly, perceived risk was proved to have a negative effect on perceived quality, perceived quality was proved to have a positive effect on perceived value, perceived risk was proved to have a positive effect on perceived value and perceived value was proved to have a positive effect on purchase intention.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to examine that identify the differences in perceived quality, perceived risk, perceived value, and purchase intention of three extrinsic cues of sporting goods (brand awareness, country-of-origin image, and perceived pri...

    The purpose of this study was to examine that identify the differences in perceived quality, perceived risk, perceived value, and purchase intention of three extrinsic cues of sporting goods (brand awareness, country-of-origin image, and perceived price), and that identify the differences between high and low levels which followed in the union extrinsic cues, that was to find out the effect of the causal relationship of the product evaluation factors which are caused by three extrinsic cues of sporting goods.
    A survey experimental research using between-subject factorial design was employed in order to develop eight types of extrinsic cues about selected products (high/low brand awareness x high/low country-of-origin image x perceived price). A subject evaluated only one type rather than all eight types because of avoiding the artificiality of the experimental results.
    The questionnaire for this study was disseminated to 1200 golfers from 20 golf driving ranges. 204 questionnaires were excluded because they were not applicable. There were 996 usable subjects (83%).
    In order to determine whether the questionnaire was valid and reliable, exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha coefficient were examined.
    To prove the hypothesis of the study based on the sampled data, structural equation modeling was conducted using the SPSSWIN 15.0 program and AMOS 7.0 program.
    The following was the results of this study. First, the results indicated that there were statistically significant differences in perceived quality, perceived risk, perceived value, and purchase intention between the levels of brand awareness, country-of-origin image, and perceived price. Second, the results indicated that there were statistically significant differences in perceived quality, perceived risk, perceived value, and purchase intention between the high and low levels which followed in the union extrinsic cues of brand awareness, country-of-origin image, and perceived price. Third, the results indicated that brand awareness, country-of-origin image, and perceived price was proved to have a positive effect on perceived quality. Fourth. the results indicated that brand awareness and country-of-origin image was proved to have a negative effect and perceived price was proved to have a positive effect on perceived risk. Fifth, the results indicated that brand awareness was proved to have a positive effect and perceived price was proved to have a negative effect on perceived risk.
    Lastly, perceived risk was proved to have a negative effect on perceived quality, perceived quality was proved to have a positive effect on perceived value, perceived risk was proved to have a positive effect on perceived value and perceived value was proved to have a positive effect on purchase intention.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목 차
    • 목 차 ⅰ
    • 표 목차 ⅲ
    • 그림목차 ⅴ
    • 목 차
    • 목 차 ⅰ
    • 표 목차 ⅲ
    • 그림목차 ⅴ
    • Ⅰ. 서 론 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 1
    • 2. 연구의 목적 4
    • 3. 연구가설 5
    • 4. 연구모형 7
    • 5. 연구의 제한점 8
    • 6. 용어의 정의 8
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 11
    • 1. 외재적 단서 11
    • 2. 제품평가 20
    • 3. 선행연구 고찰 26
    • Ⅲ. 연구 방법 35
    • 1. 조사 설계 35
    • 2. 조사도구 41
    • 3. 연구대상자의 일반적 특성 43
    • 4. 타당도 및 신뢰도 45
    • 5. 자료처리 56
    • Ⅳ. 연구 결과 58
    • 1. 실험조작변수의 사전조작 검증 58
    • 2. 외재적 단서에 따른 제품평가 요인의 차이 59
    • 3. 외재적 단서 수준에 따른 유형별 제품평가의 차이 67
    • 4. 외재적 단서와 제품평가의 인과관계 70
    • Ⅴ. 논 의 73
    • 1. 외재적 단서에 따른 제품평가 요인의 차이 73
    • 2. 외재적 단서 수준에 따른 유형별 제품평가의 차이 80
    • 3. 외재적 단서와 제품평가의 인과관계 82
    • Ⅵ. 결론 및 제언 91
    • 1. 결론 91
    • 2. 제언 93
    • 참고문헌 95
    • 부 록 105
    • ABSTRACT 116
    • 표 목 차
    • 표 1. 원산지이미지 구성요인 14
    • 표 2. 내부준거 가격의 개념 18
    • 표 3. 지각된 품질의 개념 21
    • 표 4. 지각된 위험의 유형 분류 22
    • 표 5. 가치의 정의 23
    • 표 6. 외재적 단서와 제품평가관련 선행연구 32
    • 표 7. 제품평가관련 선행연구 34
    • 표 8. 브랜드인지도 사전조사 36
    • 표 9. 독립변수의 조작 37
    • 표 10. 실험설계 39
    • 표 11. 실험설계별 구매조건 40
    • 표 12. 설문 항목 구성 42
    • 표 13. 연구대상자의 일반적 특성 44
    • 표 14. 외재적 단서의 탐색적 요인분석 46
    • 표 15. 제품평가 요인의 탐색적 요인분석 47
    • 표 16. 외재적 단서의 측정모형 적합도 49
    • 표 17. 브랜드인지도, 원산지이미지, 지각된 가격의 요인별 타당도 49
    • 표 18. 제품평가 요인의 측정모형 적합도 51
    • 표 19. 지각된 품질, 지각된 위험, 지각된 가치, 구매의도의 요인별 타당도 51
    • 표 20. 전체 측정모델의 적합도 52
    • 표 21. 전체 측정모델에 대한 요인별 타당도 54
    • 표 22. 변인별 신뢰도 55
    • 표 23. 구조방정식 모형의 적합지수 57
    • 표 24. 외생변수 조작 검증 58
    • 표 25. 지각된 품질에 대한 외재적 단서의 분산분석 59
    • 표 26. 외재적 단서의 지각된 품질에 대한 평균 60
    • 표 27. 지각된 위험에 대한 외재적 단서의 분산분석 61
    • 표 28. 외재적 단서의 지각된 위험에 대한 평균 62
    • 표 29. 지각된 가치에 대한 외재적 단서의 분산분석 63
    • 표 30. 외재적 단서의 지각된 가치에 대한 평균 64
    • 표 31. 구매의도에 대한 외재적 단서의 분산분석 65
    • 표 32. 외재적 단서의 구매의도에 대한 평균 65
    • 표 33. 유형별 제품평가 차이 검증 결과 67
    • 표 34. 연구모형의 적합도 70
    • 표 35. 외재적 단서와 제품평가에 대한 가설 검증 결과 71
    • 그 림 목 차
    • 그림 1. 연구모형 7
    • 그림 2. 원산지이미지의 현혹효과 15
    • 그림 3. 원산지이미지의 요약효과 16
    • 그림 4. 소비자 기대가격에 대한 측정 18
    • 그림 5. 외재적 단서의 확인적 요인분석 48
    • 그림 6. 제품평가 요인의 확인적 요인분석 50
    • 그림 7. 전체 측정모델의 적합도 53
    • 그림 8. 브랜드인지도와 원산지이미지의 지각된 위험에 대한 상호작용 62
    • 그림 9. 원산지이미지와 지각된 가격의 구매의도에 대한 상호작용 66
    • 그림 10. 연구모형 70
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼