기술적 사고성향 검사도구 개발

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The objective of the study is to investigate the influence of education activities that have been implemented in middle and high school’s technology education and to develop the instrument for measuring the technological thinking disposition to enhance the study related to technological thinking for the technology education.
The study was conducted with the survey and literature research. In the literature research, the concepts of technology, thinking, and thinking disposition were evaluated and the factors composing thinking and technological thinking were searched. As of the result, total of 156 thinking factors were concluded.
As for the survey, expert consultation discussion was made first and Delphi research and factor analysis were followed. In order to get advice on overall process of the study and to secure the validity and suitability for the survey, 2 professors and 5 teachers related to technological education participated in the discussion. Throughout the discussion, 77 factors out of the 156 thinking factors were selected as the element composing technological thinking and 86 inquires were chosen after reviewing preliminary survey inquires. Delphi investigations were conducted for four times. The number of members for Delphi investigation was 25 and all of them are professional in technology education including 12 of professors and researcher and 13 of teachers. The members gave an opinion on feasibility of inquires and selected 67 inquires for the survey.
Factor analysis was employed two times. For the factor analysis, the survey was also conducted for two times after classifying middle and high school students according to 4 provinces, Seoul & Kyungi, Chungcheong, Kyungsang, and Junra. 1,704 students were surveyed for the first factor analysis and 1,809 students for the second.
In the first factor analysis, 6 initial factors were induced after applying maximum likelihood extraction method to induce the initial factors. VARIMAX method was adopted to rotate the factors. The reliability of each factor showed from .779 to .897 which means it’s reliable. Based on the first factor analysis, 38 survey inquires were selected for the second factor analysis.
In the second factor analysis, 6 initial factors were also induced. However, in the analysis, principal diagonal ingredient factor extraction method was employed to induce the initial factors. VARIMAX method was adopted to rotate the factors and with this method, the structure of factor matrix was revealed. Then, the initial factors were divided as technological curiosity disposition, technological analyze disposition, technological problem identifying and resolving disposition, technological creativity and expression disposition, technological operating disposition and technological planning and reflecting disposition. It was apparent that factors in each disposition group had unique features. Also the reliability of each factor showed from .774 to .884 which means the factor is reliable. With the second factor analysis, the instrument for measuring technological disposition composed of 38 inquires could develop.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서 론 1
• 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 1
• 2. 연구의 내용 4
• 3. 용어의 정의 5
• 4. 연구의 제한점 6
• Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 7
• 1. 기술의 개념 7
• 2. 사고성향의 개념 및 구성요소 17
• 3. 기술적 사고성향의 개념 및 구성요소 53
• Ⅲ. 연구의 절차 및 방법 76
• 1. 연구의 절차 76
• 2. 연구의 방법 78
• Ⅳ. 연구의 결과 및 논의 93
• 1. 기술적 사고성향 개념요소 도출 93
• 2. 기술적 사고성향 구성요인 분류 95
• 3. 개발한 기술적 사고성향 검사도구 128
• 4. 논의 132
• Ⅴ. 요약, 결론 및 제언 134
• 1. 요약 134
• 2. 결론 135
• 3. 제언 136
• 참고 문헌 138
• ABSTRACT 149
• 부 록 152

참고문헌 (Reference)

1. 생각, 이어령, , 2009

2. Powershift, Tofflir, , 1990

3. How we think, Dewey, John, [s.n., How we Think, , 1910

4. 인지과학, 이정모, , 2010

5. The third wave, Toffler, Alvin, null,

6. Thinking styles, Sternberg, Robert J, Cambridge University Press, Thinking Styles, , 1999

7. Visual thinking, McKim, Visual thinking, , 1980

8. Critical thinking, Paul, Scriven, Critical Thinking, , 1992

9. Teaching Thinking, De Bono, Teaching thinking, , 1987

10. How the mind works, Pinker, Steven, Norton, How the Mind Works, , 1997

11. 유아철학놀이, 조선희, 창지사, , 2004

12. Productive thinking, Wertheimer, Max, University of Chicago Press, Productive Thinking, , 1982

13. The concept of mind, Ryle, Gilbert, Penguin Books, The concept of mind, , 1973

14. Exploring technology, Bame, E. Allen, Davis Publications, , 1988

15. The degrees to which, Johnson, , 1989

16. 초등수학교육론, 강완, 동명사, , 2003

17. A taxonomy forlearning, Andorson, Krathwohl, A taxonomy for learning, , 2001

18. Structure of Intellect, Guilford, , 1956

19. 요인분석의 기초, 이순묵, 교육과학사, , 2006

20. 요인분석의 이해, 이영준, 석정, , 2002

21. 타당도와 신뢰도, 성태제, 良書院, , 1996

22. Understanding by design, Wiggins, Grant P., Merrill/Prentice Hall, , 2001

23. 사고력 향상 전략, 이영호, 최정원, , 2006

24. 생각 창조의 기술, 공선표, , 2008

25. 생각은 힘이 세다, 위기철, , 2001

26. To be or not to be (mindful), Salomon, , 1994

27. 사고력 검사 개발 연구, 한국교육과정평가원, , 2002

28. Critical thinking and education, McPeck, John E, Robertson, , 1981

29. The nature of intelligence. N. Y, Guilford, , 1967

30. 인과모형의 이해와 응용, 김석우, 최용석, , 2001

31. 학교수학의 교육적 기초, 우정호, 서울대학교출판부, , 1998

32. The school as a home for the mind, Costa, , 1991

33. 사고 교육의 이론과 실제, 성일제, 사고교육의 이론과 실제, , 1986

34. (SPSS WIN을 이용한)통계분석, 채서일, B&M북스, SPSS WIN을 이용한 통계분석, , 2005

35. Developing a Thinking Skill Program, Beyer, , 1988

36. 중학교 기술과 교육의 연혁, 이재원, 대한공업교육학회, 대한공업교육학회지. 11(1). 3-9, , 1986

37. Creative and Critical Thinking(2nd ed), Moore, , 1974

38. Teaching Technology: A Teacher's Guide, Laura, Israel, Wright, , 1993

39. Types of Thinking. 이영애 역(2003), Robertson, , 1999

40. Teaching thinking across the curriculum, Ruggiero, Vincent Ryan, Harper & Row, Teaching thinking across the curriculum, , 1988

41. 창의성 사고력 검사 실시요강, 이기우, , 1997

42. The Psychological Foundations of Culture, Tooby, Cosmides, , 1992

43. The disposition toward critical thinking, Facione, Sacnchez, Gainen, , 1995

44. Managing technology for corporate success, Floyd, C, Gower, , 1997

45. Nature vs. nature: the feeling of vuja de, Hund, , 1997

46. Measuring thinking skills in the classroom, Stiggins, Quellmalz, , 1988

47. Technology: A Socio-Historical Perspective, Kasprzyk, , 1980

48. 기술적 문제해결력 평가틀 개발, 이한규, 서울대학교 대학원, 서울대학교 박사학위 논문, , 2006

49. 사고력 신장을 위한 ICT활용교육, 교육과학기술부, , 2007

50. A quantitative approach to content validity, Lawshe, A quantitative approach to content validity, , 1975

51. A comprehension approach to teaching thinking, Schiever, , 1991

52. Thinking : directed, undirected, and creative, Gilhooly, K. J, Academic Press, "Thinking: Directed, , 1996

53. A conceptual framework for technology education, Sterry, Savage, , 1990

54. On Solving Mathematical Problems in High School, Polya, , 1980

55. Testing for the disposition to think critically, Norris, , 1994

56. 수학적사고와 수학적사고력의 신장, 전평국, , 1990

57. Jackson's Mill Industrial Arts Curriculum Theory, Snyder, J. F., , 1981

58. The Delphi Method Ⅱ : Structure of Experiments, Brown, Dalkey, The Delphi Method Ⅱ: Structure of Experiments, , 1969

59. 수학적 사고력 신장을 위한 지도방안, 정승연, , 2008

60. Designing a New Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Marzano, R. J., Designing a new taxonomy of educational objectives, , 2001

61. Beyond abilities: A dispositional theory of thinking, Tishman, Perkins, Jay, , 1993

62. Technological change : its impact on man and society, Mesthene, E. G, Harvard University, , 1970

63. Technology-A process approach. Doctoral dissertation, Halfin, , 1973

64. 사고력 신장을 위한 프로그램 개발연구, 허경철, 한국교육개발원, , 1990

65. Technology as Knowledge: Implications for Instruction, Herschbach, , 1995

66. Spark Of Genius. 박종성 역(2007). 생각의 탄생, Bernstein, , 1999

67. HOW BRAINS THINK. 윤소영 역(2006). 생각의 탄생, Calvin, , 1996

68. The California Critical Thinking Dispositions Inventory, Facione N.C, Facione, , 1992

69. 知的思考. 박화 역(2007). 지적 사고의 기술, 大神賢一郞, , 2007

70. Hemisphere Differences in Serial and Paralle lProcessing, Cohen, , 1973

71. 언어적 사고력 표준화 검사도구 개발 연구, 기세령, , 2005

72. A model for teaching thinking skills: The inclusion process, Stockton, Worsham, , 1986

73. A rationale and structue for industrial arts subject matter, Ray, Towers, Lux, , 1966

74. 과학적 사고력 향상을 위한 과학글쓰기 활동, 천재훈, 경상대학교 대학원, 경상대학교 석사학위논문, , 2006

75. Interpretation of Dreams(original German work published 1900), Freud, , 1954

76. The Work of Nations. Random House Inc.Roco & Bainbridge. (2002), Reich, , 1993

77. I of the Vortex. 김미선 역(2007). 꿈꾸는 기계의 진화, Llinas, , 2002

78. The computer and the mind : an introduction to cognitive science, Johnson-Laird, P. N, Harvard University Press, , 1988

79. Toward a "unified curriculum framework" for technology education, Wicklein, Rojewski, "Toward a ""unified curriculum framework"" for technology education", , 1999

80. Boilogy and behavior of the endangered Hawaiian dark-rumped petrel, Simon, , 1985

81. Thinking skills throughout the K-12 curriculum: A conceptual design, Pressein, , 1985

82. Assessing critical thinking dispositions: Theoretical considerations, Ennis, , 1994

83. 유아교육 프로그램을 위한 언어 및 사고능력의 연구, 주영희, 이화여자대학교, 유아교육프로그램을 위한 언어 및 사고능력의 연구, , 1982

84. Thinking in Education. 김혜숙 역(2005). 고차적 사고력 교육, Lipman, , 2003

85. Defining the role of Technology Education by Its Heart and Its Heritage, Snyder, , 2004

86. Thinking Through Technology: The Path Between Engineering and Philosophy, Michem, , 1994

87. 비판적 사고성향 측정도구의 개발 및 양호도 검증 연구, 김명숙, , 2006

88. Thinking dispositions: A review of current theories, practices, and issues, Tishman, S., "Thinking Dispositions: A review of current theories,

89. 비판적 사고 능력 향상을 통한 진정한 도덕 교육의 실현, 이명열, , 2009

90. A factor anaysis of primary mental processes for technological problem solving, Hill, Wicklein, , 1999

91. 초등학교 아동의 과학적 사고력과 학습 습관과의 상관관계, 김진황, 건국대학교 교육대학원, , 1996

92. 유아 철학놀이가 유아의 창의적 사고력 향상에 미치는 효과, 홍승분, , 2007

93. 기술 관련 전문가의 인식에 기초한 기술적 창조성 모형 개발, 권현진, 충남대학교 대학원, 충남대학교 박사학위 논문, , 2005

94. 부모의 동화 읽어주기가 언어표현력과 사고력에 미치는 영향, 임영희, , 1997

95. Critical Thinking : What Every Person Needs to Survive in a Rapidly Changing World, Richard W.P, Gerald M.N, Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world, , 1992

96. Technology for All American: A Rationale and Structure for the study of Technology, International Technology Education Association, , 1996

97. 現在, 和達?芬奇一起思考. 류방승 역(2006). 다빈치의 두뇌 사용법, 吳建光, "現在, , 2005

98. Negotiating the funnel: Guiding students toward understanding elusive generative concepts, Bell, Grotzer, , 1999

99. Computerization of the education system and its implications for curricula. Position paper, Chen, , 1996

100. 주변 동·식물 관찰과제의 자율 관찰 활동을 통한 과학적 사고력 신장, 이석주, 주변 동?식물 관찰과제의 자율 관찰 활동을 통한 과학적 사고력 신장, , 1998

101. 중학생의 과학적 사고력 증진을 위한 교육프로그램 개발에 관한 연구, 김선봉, , 2007

102. A description of expert and novice performance differences on technical troubleshooting tasks, Johnson, , 1989

103. Framework for the study of the cognitive nature and architecture of technological problem solving, Mioduser, , 1998

104. General Systems Theory: Toward a conceptual framework for science and technology education for all, Stroup, Chen, , 1993

105. 창의력 및 과학적 사고력을 높이기 위한 생물 실험 모듈 개발 및 적용 효과, 윤덕근, 한국교원대학교, 한국교원대학교 석사학위 논문, , 2002

106. 사회과 논쟁문제 수업이 고급사고력 신장에 미치는 효과에 관한 분석적 고찰, 최성모, , 2007

107. 프로젝트를 활용한 수업이 수학적 사고력 및 수학적 의사소통에 미치는 영향, 류신영, , 2007

108. 과학비유탐구놀이 학습방법의 적용을 통한 과학적 사고력의 신장에 관한 연구, 윤용석, 제주교육대학교 교육대학원, 제주교육대학교 교육대학원 석사학위 논문, , 2004

109. 창의성 프로그램이 초등학교 아동의 창의적 사고력 및 문제해결력에 미치는 효과, 이경은, 대전대학교 교육대학원, , 2006

110. 탐색 트리에 기반한 정보 및 수학 영재의 사고력 신장을 위한 교수-학습 모형 개발, 김병조, , 2008

111. 초등학교 아동의 다중지능 패턴과 과학적 사고력 및 과학에 대한 태도와의 관계 연구, 임채성, 권영민, 부산교육대학교 과학교육연구소, 과학교육연구. 24(1). 139-158, , 1999

112. The effects of critical thinking and information monitoring process on the conclusion drawing from contrary information, Hirayama, Kusumi, , 2005

113. Creativity-A componential approach Post conferenceChina meeting of the 11th world conference on gifted and talentedchildren, Urban, Creativity-A componential approach. post conference China meeting of the 11th World conference on gifted and talented children, , 1995

114. 제7차 교육과정에 따른 물리 교과 내용이 요구하는 과학적 사고력과 중학생들의 인지 발달 수준과의 관계 분석, 이경미, , 2007