RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    초등학교 아동의 다중지능 패턴과 과학적 사고력 및 과학에 대한 태도와의 관계 연구 = The Relationships of Patterns of Multiple Intelligences, Scientific Reasoning Skills, and Attitudes toward Science of Elementary School Children

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A30055191

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Recently, a growing awareness of the various dimensions of human intelligence has resulted in several major critiques of existing notion for intelligence human abilities. The Multiple Intelligences(MI) theory is one major alternative to these critiques. This study was undertaken with the purpose of providing insights into science teaching-learning theories and methodologies based on MI of children, with the hope of informing and changing school-based practice. To accomplish this purpose, we explored the relationships of patterns of multiple intelligences, scientific reasoning skills, and attitudes toward science of elementary school children. The results as follows.
    First, there were no significant difference between MI and attitudes toward science by cognitive styles of the children. However, the scientific reasoning abilities of the field-independent children were significantly higher those of the field-dependent ones. This suggests that, when science teachers design and implement a specific strategy, the tasks should be presented with the consideration on cognitive styles of learners and the cooperative activities should be organized on the basis this factor.
    Second, the differences among MI, the scientific reasoning abilities, and the attitudes toward science were not statistically significant.
    Third, for attributes of the measures of MI, on both types of preference and ability the verbal/linguistic, bodily/kinesthetic, musical/rhythmic, naturalist intelligences were significantly different.
    Forth, the intelligences of MI except for the interpersonal and bodily/kinesthetic, and musical/rhythmic intelligences were shown to have significant relationships with the scientific reasoning abilities. This suggest that for the improvement of children through the science teaching and learning situations, the opportunities to engage one's own superior or preferred intelligences, and various materials to stretch all aspects of the students' MI should be provided.
    Finally, MI and the attitudes toward science were found to have significant positive relationships. This implies that to improve the attitudes toward science of children various intelligences should be used equally so that all intelligences to be stretched and celebrated.
    These findings provide a basis for understanding the roles of MI in learning science. The results also highlight the need for teachers to provide experiences and to create environments which encourage the engagement of MI of learners when teach science subjects.
    번역하기

    Recently, a growing awareness of the various dimensions of human intelligence has resulted in several major critiques of existing notion for intelligence human abilities. The Multiple Intelligences(MI) theory is one major alternative to these critique...

    Recently, a growing awareness of the various dimensions of human intelligence has resulted in several major critiques of existing notion for intelligence human abilities. The Multiple Intelligences(MI) theory is one major alternative to these critiques. This study was undertaken with the purpose of providing insights into science teaching-learning theories and methodologies based on MI of children, with the hope of informing and changing school-based practice. To accomplish this purpose, we explored the relationships of patterns of multiple intelligences, scientific reasoning skills, and attitudes toward science of elementary school children. The results as follows.
    First, there were no significant difference between MI and attitudes toward science by cognitive styles of the children. However, the scientific reasoning abilities of the field-independent children were significantly higher those of the field-dependent ones. This suggests that, when science teachers design and implement a specific strategy, the tasks should be presented with the consideration on cognitive styles of learners and the cooperative activities should be organized on the basis this factor.
    Second, the differences among MI, the scientific reasoning abilities, and the attitudes toward science were not statistically significant.
    Third, for attributes of the measures of MI, on both types of preference and ability the verbal/linguistic, bodily/kinesthetic, musical/rhythmic, naturalist intelligences were significantly different.
    Forth, the intelligences of MI except for the interpersonal and bodily/kinesthetic, and musical/rhythmic intelligences were shown to have significant relationships with the scientific reasoning abilities. This suggest that for the improvement of children through the science teaching and learning situations, the opportunities to engage one's own superior or preferred intelligences, and various materials to stretch all aspects of the students' MI should be provided.
    Finally, MI and the attitudes toward science were found to have significant positive relationships. This implies that to improve the attitudes toward science of children various intelligences should be used equally so that all intelligences to be stretched and celebrated.
    These findings provide a basis for understanding the roles of MI in learning science. The results also highlight the need for teachers to provide experiences and to create environments which encourage the engagement of MI of learners when teach science subjects.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
    • Ⅲ. 연구 방법
    • Ⅳ. 결과 및 논의
    • Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언
    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
    • Ⅲ. 연구 방법
    • Ⅳ. 결과 및 논의
    • Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언
    • 참고문헌
    • ABSTRACT
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼