상호저축은행의 이익관리에 관한 연구 : 이익유연화 행태를 중심으로

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Since the bull real estate market in 2000s, many financial institutions have vigorously developed Project Financing (PF) on security of expected real estate value. These institutions, however, are stumbling in the midst of the prolonged recession of real estate market, severely affected from the world economic crisis in year 2008. Further, the mighty amount of PF loan is in very shaky situation due to the series of the collapses of the construction companies and the real estate development firms. The harsher challenge overhangs the small Mutual Savings Banks (MSBs), 15% of whose assets are struggling in the PF loan swamp. Why most of the MSBs have to suffer tougher winter than other financial institutions? Is there any way to find a co-relation between business performance and profit management? My research is motivated by searching for the answers to these questions.

I formulate a regression equation with variables from proved prior researches. In addition, I perform the extra regression analysis on individual group to figure out differences on each group's profit management. Statistical Sample of the research is all 106 MSBs operating in Korea in June, 2009 and I exam three years of financial statements of the samples from year 2007.

In general, the profit management in financial institution can be researched with three areas, Income smoothing, Capital management, and cooperate tax management. This research mainly focus on Income smoothing and Capital management only. In the result of regression analysis concerned on profit flexibility in MSBs, the executives in MSBs tend to manage the profit based on Nondiscretionary Income which shows the pre-income adjustment outcome of the year. Samples can be divided into two groups. One has positive(+) Nondiscretionary Income and the other has negative(-) one. In the regression analysis on negative group, the result of the analysis produce meaningful regression value between Allowance for Doubtful Account and Nondiscretionary Excessive Income but on the positive group. the result is not very meaningful. Hence, the MSBs in the negaitive group are trying to control their income with Allowance for Doubtful Account. In the regression analysis on each regional groups, divided into Metro Seoul, Busan and other region, the result produce the meaningful explanatory variables, that is, there's no regional difference on income management. Further, the analysis on the big and small group divided based on asset size, MSBs in the big group tend to perform income management more actively.

In the regression analysis on asset management in MSBs, result produce very meaningful regression value between dependent variable, Allowance for Doubtful Account and validation variable, Capital Adequacy Ratio. This result proves that MSBs are trying to manage Capitial Adequacy Ratio with manipulating Allowance for Doubtful Account. Like the research result on the profit flexibility, the research outcome produce meaningful regression values only in variables of Credit without profit and basic Allowance for Doubtful Account. In addition, I divide the sample into two groups based on standard BIS ratio, 8%. In the group having a higher BIS ratio than standard one, the outcome of the regression analysis shows that this group more likely manage its asset using Allowance for Doubtful Account than lower group. Further, in the regression analysis on regional and asset size differences, there are meaningful differences between the regional groups but in the asset size wise, there are no meaningful differences.

This research could provide some valuable reference to the financial and bank supervisory authorities. When the authorities supervise and monitor MSBs, they should consider very important fact that executives in the MSBs persue profit flexibility and capital management with manipulating Allowance for Doubtful Account which is very discretionary fund. With this careful consideration, supervisory authorities could evaluate the business performance of the MSBs more accurate way. Although I try to pursue analysis in various aspects, contents of the validation are very simple and the result of the research is very limit to the scope of other conventional researches.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 제 1 장 서 론
• 제 1 절 연구의 배경 및 목적
• 제 2 절 연구의 방법 및 구성
• 제 2 장 상호저축은행 현황
• 제 1 절 지역별 분포
• 제 2 절 총자산 현황
• 제 3 절 주요 경영 현황
• 1. 영업점 및 거래고객 현황
• 2. 여․수신 현황
• 3. 손익 현황
• 4. BIS기준 자기자본 및 경영실태평가 현황
• 제 4 절 상호저축은행의 경영관리 기준
• 제 5 절 상호저축은행의 회계처리 방식
• 제 3 장 이익관리의 이론적 배경 및 선행연구
• 제 1 절 이익조정의 정의
• 제 2 절 이익조정에 관한 이론
• 제 3 절 선행연구
• 1. 이익유연화 가설
• 2. 자본관리를 위한 이익관리 가설
• 3. 법인세관리 가설
• 4. 부채비율 가설
• 제 4 절 연구방법에 관한 고찰
• 제 4 장 연구의 설계
• 제 1 절 선행연구와의 차이점
• 제 2 절 가설의 정립
• 제 3 절 연구모형
• 1. 연구가설 H1의 검증을 위한 연구모형
• 2. 연구가설 H2의 검증을 위한 연구모형
• 제 4 절 표본선정
• 제 5 장 실증분석
• 제 1 절 가설1의 검증
• 1. 기술통계와 상관관계
• 2. 회귀분석 결과
• 2-1. 기본모형1의 회귀분석(가설1의 검증)
• 2-2. 비재량적초과이익 집단별 회귀분석
• 2-3. 지역별구분에 의한 회귀분석
• 2-4. 규모별 구분에 의한 회귀분석
• 제 2 절 가설2의 검증
• 1. 기술통계와 상관관계
• 2. 회귀분석 결과
• 2-1. 기본모형2의 회귀분석(가설2의 검증)
• 2-2. BIS비율에 따른 집단비교 분석
• 2-3. 지역별구분에 의한 회귀분석
• 2-4. 규모별 구분에 의한 회귀분석
• 제 3 절 분석결과의 종합 및 시사점
• 1. 이익유연화
• 2. 자본관리
• 3. 시사점
• 제 6 장 결 론
• 【참고문헌】
• ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (Reference)

1. Income Smoothing, Copeland, , 1968

2. Income Smoothing byEconomySector, Albrecht, , 1990

3. TheIncomeSmoothingHypothesisRevisted, Eckel, , 1981

4. Earnings Management in Japanese Companies, Darrough, , 1998

5. TheEffectofBonusSchemesofAccountingDecisions, Healy, , 1985

6. A Noteon IncomeSmoothingintheChemicalIndustry, Dasher, , 1970

7. 부동산처분이익을 이용한 이익조절, 박한순, 한국회계학회, 회계학연구 제1호 :pp89-106, , 2001

8. 대손상각을 이용한 은행의 이익관리, 문현주, 全南大學校 大學院, 전남대학교 대학원박사학위논문, , 2004

9. Research design issues in earnings managementstudies, McNichols, , 2000

10. Earning Volatility,EarningsManagementand Equity Value, Hunt, "Earning Volatility, , 1995

11. 은행의 대손충당금전입 조정과 주가반응, 최효순, 한국증권학회, 증권학회지 제32집 1호 :pp35-70, , 2003

12. 회계변경의 이익유연화 현상과 주가반응, 송인만, 최관, , 1992

13. A market-based evaluation of discretionary accrual models, Guay, R.L.Watts, S.P.Kotharl, , 1996

14. The nature ofinformation in commercialbank loanlossdisclosures, Wahlen, M., Wahlen, , 1994

15. CapitalAdequacyRatioRegulationsandAccountingChoiceinCommercialBanks, Moyer, , 1990

16. 대손충당금설정액의 재량성과 은행가치 관련성 연구, 문현주, 한국회계학회, 회계저널 제14권 제1호 :pp1-26, , 2005

17. Determinants of Signaling byBanksthroughLoanLossProvisions"WorkingPaper, Lobo, "Determinants of Signaling byBanksthroughLoanLossProvisions""WorkingPaper", , 2000

18. Tax Planning, EarningsManagement,and the DifferentialEarnings Component, T.Linsmeier, Warfield, "Tax Planning, , 1992

19. BIS비율 수준에 따른 이익관리와 자산관리에 대한 고찰, 전용순, , 1999

20. Bank differences in the coordination of regulatory capital, earnings, and taxes, J.Wahlen, Collins, "BankDifferencesintheCoordination of Regulatory Capital, , 1995

21. Loan loss reserves and income smoothing, Theexperience in the U.S,Banking industry, Ma, C., "Loan loss reserves and income smoothing, , 1988

22. BIS기준 자기자본비율에 의한 국내은행의 가치평가에 관한연구, 구기동, 고려대학교, , 1998

23. 은행대손충당금과 이익관리 및 자본적정성 비율관리에 관한 연구, 윤재원, 최현돌, , 2004

24. 세금비용과 이익조정이 회계이익과 과세소득의 차이에 미치는 영향, 박종일, 弘益大學校 大學院, 회계학연구 제2호 :pp81-116, , 2001

25. Additional Evidence on theAssociation between Income Management and Earnings-BasedBonus Plans, J.Justin, Gaver, , 1995

26. Bank loan lossprovisions:A reexaminationofcapitalmanagement,earningsmanagementandsingnaling effect, Ahmed, S.Thomas, "Bank loan lossprovisions:A reexaminationofcapitalmanagement, , 1999

27. Discretionary behaviorwith respectto allowances for loan losses and the behavior of securityprices, Beaver, , 1996

28. Accounting Earnings and Cash Flows as Measures of Firm Performance: the Role of Accounting Accruals, Dechow, , 1994

29. TheEffectofAntitrustInvestigation on DiscretionaryAccruals:A RefinedTestofPolitical- CostHypothesis, Cahan, Cahan, S., , 1992

30. The Effects of Regulatory andContracting CostsonBanks'ChoiceofAccounting MethodforOther Postretirement Employment Benefits, Ramesh, , 2000