RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    공학 자기효능감 척도 개발 및 타당화 = Construction and validation of engineering self-efficacy scale

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11806809

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of the present study is to develop an engineering self-efficacy scale for students. Based on the result of literature review, I developed 79 test items and was administered preparatory test for 111 engineering major university students located in Busan. As a result of factor analysis, major related knowledge efficacy, career expectations efficacy, team activity related efficacy and creativity related efficacy were yielded and 33 items (9 major related knowledge efficacy items 10, career expectations efficacy items 7, team activity related efficacy items 7, creativity related efficacy items) were selected as final items. I conducted main study with selected items for 501 engineering major university students in Busan. Correlation analysis among the subscores of engineering self-efficacy and general self-efficacy scale were conducted for the concurrent validity. After conducting correlated analysis between general self efficacy scale(차정은, 1997), the value between subordinate factors is .34~.66 and the value between overall factors is 69. Through this study, I can identify that component factors between two measurement are correlated.
    To identify the item distinction level of engineering self efficacy and to verify average and standard deviation of each item and to verify the difference in upper/lower 25% group, I conducted t-test. In each item, the average engineering self efficacy of upper group was higher than that of lower group. All 33 items show significant difference between two groups. According to the result of distinction level of subordinate factors, major related efficacy, career expectations efficacy, team activity related efficacy and creativity related efficacy show significant differences between groups. Consequently, the items that compose this scale are reliable in item response distribution or item discrimination.
    Internal consistency (Cronbach's α)of engineering self efficacy scale is as follows: major related efficacy ,81, career expectations efficacy related efficacy .78, team activity related efficacy .88. creativity related efficacy .82. Internal consistency (Cronbach's α) of the sacle is very high .94. Overall, this engineering self-efficacy shows satisfactory reliability in measuring engineering self efficacy.
    Engineering self efficacy scale was proved that this scale is composed of items which have high reliability and validity in terms of statistics. There, this scale can provide concrete and objective materials in measuring engineering self efficacy.
    번역하기

    The purpose of the present study is to develop an engineering self-efficacy scale for students. Based on the result of literature review, I developed 79 test items and was administered preparatory test for 111 engineering major university students loc...

    The purpose of the present study is to develop an engineering self-efficacy scale for students. Based on the result of literature review, I developed 79 test items and was administered preparatory test for 111 engineering major university students located in Busan. As a result of factor analysis, major related knowledge efficacy, career expectations efficacy, team activity related efficacy and creativity related efficacy were yielded and 33 items (9 major related knowledge efficacy items 10, career expectations efficacy items 7, team activity related efficacy items 7, creativity related efficacy items) were selected as final items. I conducted main study with selected items for 501 engineering major university students in Busan. Correlation analysis among the subscores of engineering self-efficacy and general self-efficacy scale were conducted for the concurrent validity. After conducting correlated analysis between general self efficacy scale(차정은, 1997), the value between subordinate factors is .34~.66 and the value between overall factors is 69. Through this study, I can identify that component factors between two measurement are correlated.
    To identify the item distinction level of engineering self efficacy and to verify average and standard deviation of each item and to verify the difference in upper/lower 25% group, I conducted t-test. In each item, the average engineering self efficacy of upper group was higher than that of lower group. All 33 items show significant difference between two groups. According to the result of distinction level of subordinate factors, major related efficacy, career expectations efficacy, team activity related efficacy and creativity related efficacy show significant differences between groups. Consequently, the items that compose this scale are reliable in item response distribution or item discrimination.
    Internal consistency (Cronbach's α)of engineering self efficacy scale is as follows: major related efficacy ,81, career expectations efficacy related efficacy .78, team activity related efficacy .88. creativity related efficacy .82. Internal consistency (Cronbach's α) of the sacle is very high .94. Overall, this engineering self-efficacy shows satisfactory reliability in measuring engineering self efficacy.
    Engineering self efficacy scale was proved that this scale is composed of items which have high reliability and validity in terms of statistics. There, this scale can provide concrete and objective materials in measuring engineering self efficacy.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 1
    • 2. 연구문제 6
    • 3. 용어정의 6
    • Ⅰ. 서론 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 1
    • 2. 연구문제 6
    • 3. 용어정의 6
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 8
    • 1. 자기효능감의 이론 8
    • 2. 공학 자기효능감 21
    • 3. 선행연구의 고찰 31
    • Ⅲ. 연구방법 35
    • 1. 연구대상 35
    • 2. 연구절차 36
    • 3. 측정도구 40
    • 4. 자료분석 46
    • Ⅳ. 결과해석 48
    • 1. 타당도 검증 결과 48
    • 2. 문항변별도 검증 결과 56
    • 3. 신뢰도 검증 결과 67
    • Ⅴ. 논의 72
    • Ⅵ. 요약 및 결론 75
    • 참고문헌 81
    • 부 록 1 92
    • 부 록 2 96
    • Abstract 98
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼