RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    원예복지 프로그램이 여성노인의 안녕감에 미치는 영향 = The effects of Horticulture wellfare Program on Well-being in the Female Elderly

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11457722

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      광주 : 조선대학교, 2008

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문(박사) -- 조선대학교 일반대학원 , 사회복지학과 , 2008. 8

    • 발행연도

      2008

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • 주제어
    • DDC

      362.6 판사항(21)

    • 발행국(도시)

      광주

    • 형태사항

      ix, 176 p : 삽화, 도표 ; 26cm.

    • 일반주기명

      The effects of Horticulture wellfare Program on Well-being in the Female Elderly
      지도교수:오을림
      참고문헌 : 110-121 p.

    • 소장기관
      • 국립중앙도서관 국립중앙도서관 우편복사 서비스
      • 조선대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The present study was aimed to examine whether the horticulture welfare program affects to improve the well-being in the female elderly, improve the self-esteem, and decrease the hopelessness, the depression, emotional?physical stress. This research is non-equivalent design control group pretest-posttest study was performed.
    Sixty-four subjects aged over 60, living in G city, were studied. They were assigned either for the experimental(n = 34) or for the control group(n = 30).
    The experimental group participated in horticulture welfare program consisting of 90 minutes per 2 times a week during the period of 12 weeks. The research tools were Rosenberg(1965)`s self-esteem questionnaires(6 point scale)with minor revision of Jeon(1989), Beck(1974)`s hopelessness(6 point scale), Radloff(1977)`s depression(4 point scale) and Park(1999)`s emotional?physical stress(6 point scale). Data were collected between the 1st November in 2007 and 31st January in 2008, and analyzed by χ2- test, t-test and paired t-test using a SPSS 11.5 program.
    The results obtained were as follows:
    1. The condition between test group and control group, before the test was almost equivalent(p > .05).
    2. Hypothesis 1 : Test groups that were provided horticulture welfare program have more improved on self-esteem than the control group. This was supported. There was a significant change for on self-esteem of test group after the program(t = -2.308, p = .027). And there was no significant change on self-esteem of control group(t = 1.000, p = .325). After the programs there was significant change between test group and control group(t = 3.991, p = .000).
    3. Hypothesis 2 : Test groups that were provided horticulture welfare program have more decreased on hopelessness than the control group. This was supported. There was a significant change on hopelessness of test group after the program(t = 2.197, p = .035). And there was no significant change on cognitive function of control group(t = -1.000, p = .325). After the programs there was significant change between test group and control group(t = -2.704, p = .009).
    4. Hypothesis 3 : Test groups that were provided horticulture welfare program have more decreased on depression than the control group. This was supported. There was a significant change for on depression of test group after the program(t = 2.074, p = .046). And there was no significant change on depression of control group(t = -1.000, p = .327). After the programs there was significant change between test group and control group(t = -2.307, p = .024).
    5. Hypothesis 4 : Test groups that were provided horticulture welfare program have more decreased on emotional stress than the control group. This was supported. There was a significant change for on emotional stress of test group after the program(t = 3.301, p = .002). And there was no significant change on emotional stress of control group(t = -1.000, p = .325). After the programs there was significant change between test group and control group(t = -4.379, p = .000).
    6. Hypothesis 5 : Test groups that were provided horticulture welfare program have no decrease on physical stress than the control group. This was rejected. After the programs there was no significant change between test group and control group((t = 1.236, p = .225).
    These results indicate that the horticulture welfare program may be effective to improve the well-being in the female elderly. It may be desirable for the female elderly to develop and continuously practice horticulture welfare program.y.
    번역하기

    The present study was aimed to examine whether the horticulture welfare program affects to improve the well-being in the female elderly, improve the self-esteem, and decrease the hopelessness, the depression, emotional?physical stress. This research i...

    The present study was aimed to examine whether the horticulture welfare program affects to improve the well-being in the female elderly, improve the self-esteem, and decrease the hopelessness, the depression, emotional?physical stress. This research is non-equivalent design control group pretest-posttest study was performed.
    Sixty-four subjects aged over 60, living in G city, were studied. They were assigned either for the experimental(n = 34) or for the control group(n = 30).
    The experimental group participated in horticulture welfare program consisting of 90 minutes per 2 times a week during the period of 12 weeks. The research tools were Rosenberg(1965)`s self-esteem questionnaires(6 point scale)with minor revision of Jeon(1989), Beck(1974)`s hopelessness(6 point scale), Radloff(1977)`s depression(4 point scale) and Park(1999)`s emotional?physical stress(6 point scale). Data were collected between the 1st November in 2007 and 31st January in 2008, and analyzed by χ2- test, t-test and paired t-test using a SPSS 11.5 program.
    The results obtained were as follows:
    1. The condition between test group and control group, before the test was almost equivalent(p > .05).
    2. Hypothesis 1 : Test groups that were provided horticulture welfare program have more improved on self-esteem than the control group. This was supported. There was a significant change for on self-esteem of test group after the program(t = -2.308, p = .027). And there was no significant change on self-esteem of control group(t = 1.000, p = .325). After the programs there was significant change between test group and control group(t = 3.991, p = .000).
    3. Hypothesis 2 : Test groups that were provided horticulture welfare program have more decreased on hopelessness than the control group. This was supported. There was a significant change on hopelessness of test group after the program(t = 2.197, p = .035). And there was no significant change on cognitive function of control group(t = -1.000, p = .325). After the programs there was significant change between test group and control group(t = -2.704, p = .009).
    4. Hypothesis 3 : Test groups that were provided horticulture welfare program have more decreased on depression than the control group. This was supported. There was a significant change for on depression of test group after the program(t = 2.074, p = .046). And there was no significant change on depression of control group(t = -1.000, p = .327). After the programs there was significant change between test group and control group(t = -2.307, p = .024).
    5. Hypothesis 4 : Test groups that were provided horticulture welfare program have more decreased on emotional stress than the control group. This was supported. There was a significant change for on emotional stress of test group after the program(t = 3.301, p = .002). And there was no significant change on emotional stress of control group(t = -1.000, p = .325). After the programs there was significant change between test group and control group(t = -4.379, p = .000).
    6. Hypothesis 5 : Test groups that were provided horticulture welfare program have no decrease on physical stress than the control group. This was rejected. After the programs there was no significant change between test group and control group((t = 1.236, p = .225).
    These results indicate that the horticulture welfare program may be effective to improve the well-being in the female elderly. It may be desirable for the female elderly to develop and continuously practice horticulture welfare program.y.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 제1장 서론 = 1
    • 제1절 연구 목적 = 1
    • 제2절 연구범위 및 방법 = 5
    • 제2장 이론적 고찰 = 8
    • 제1절 원예복지 활동 = 8
    • 제1장 서론 = 1
    • 제1절 연구 목적 = 1
    • 제2절 연구범위 및 방법 = 5
    • 제2장 이론적 고찰 = 8
    • 제1절 원예복지 활동 = 8
    • 제2절 여성노인의 안녕감 = 15
    • 제3절 원예복지 프로그램 = 30
    • 제3장 연구 설계 = 61
    • 제1절 연구모형 및 가설설정 = 61
    • 제2절 변수의 조작화 = 65
    • 제3절 실험설계 = 68
    • 제4절 연구대상 및 자료수집 = 69
    • 제5절 연구 진행절차 = 70
    • 제6절 자료 분석 방법 = 74
    • 제4장 원예복지 프로그램의 영향 분석 = 75
    • 제1절 일반적 특성의 동질성 분석 = 75
    • 제2절 조사대상자의 일반적 특성별 원예복지프로그램 실시 전과 후의 변화 = 76
    • 제3절 제변수의 실험 전 측정치의 동질성 분석 = 87
    • 제4절 가설검증 = 88
    • 제5장 논의 및 결론 = 98
    • 제1절 논의 = 98
    • 제2절 결론 = 105
    • 참고문헌 = 110
    • 부록 = 122
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼