RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    임파워링 리더십이 조직구성원의 혁신행동과 조직시민행동에 미치는 영향

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10676613

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      광주 : 조선대학교 대학원, 2006

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문(박사) -- 조선대학교 대학원 , 경영학과 , 2006. 2

    • 발행연도

      2006

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • 주제어
    • KDC

      325.3 판사항(4)

    • DDC

      658.4 판사항(21)

    • 발행국(도시)

      광주

    • 기타서명

      (The) Effects of Empowering Leadership on Innovative Behavior of Organizational Members and Organizational Citizenship Behavior

    • 형태사항

      x, 123 p. : 삽화 ; 26 cm.

    • 일반주기명

      지도교수: 李康玉
      참고문헌: p.103-117

    • 소장기관
      • 국립중앙도서관 국립중앙도서관 우편복사 서비스
      • 조선대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Leadership has been dealt as one of central matters in the business field. Many companies in Korea, especially the big corporations, have introduced a lot of organizational innovation programs to cope with the international atmosphere making a feature of limitless competition and glottalization since 1990. Due to changes of organizational atmosphere influencing the study of leadership, we come to need new paradigm about leadership. Recently, a variety of theories about leadership have come out.
    The cause of studying new theories about leadership is related with the changes of business atmosphere. Businesses have changed their atmosphere seeking stable efficiency into flexible and innovative atmosphere that is suitable for the rapidly changing world situation. Therefore, individual abilities of organization members are considered as one of the most important factors. Gradually, we emphasize leader's role influencing to organization members in a little different style comparing with the way used in the past.
    In harmony with situation emphasizing leadership, this research will show the conceptual system about empowering leadership, which doesn't have theoretical frame yet. Also we are going to investigate the extent of influence in the team-effectiveness dimension when organization members would recognize empowering leadership. But, the process from perceiving empowering leadership to taking actions is so complicated. For that reason, this research will study complicated psychological process in detail.
    Specific aims of this research is as follows.
    First, we will examine the existing researches about empowering leadership. On the basis of them, we will search out the relation between recognition of empowering leadership and innovative and organizational citizenship behaviors.
    Second, we will practically examine how much can recognition of empowering leadership directly related with innovative behaviors and team commitment explain innovative behaviors and what mediation roles are done.
    Third, we will also practically examine how much can recognition of empowering leadership directly related with organizational citizenship behaviors and team commitment explain organizational citizenship behaviors and what mediation roles are done.
    Fourth, we will verify the validity of the model planned this research through examining the influencing power of subordinate variables of empowering leadership which has effect on innovative behaviors and organizational citizenship behaviors.
    Finally, we will present administrative implication that helps you to raise the level of innovative behaviors and organizational citizenship behaviors through analyzing concepts of empowering leadership on the basis of results of previous researches.
    We distributed questionnaires related with this research to workers who were employed in an bank and in a financial institution from October 14th to November 10th in 2005. There are 287 samples gathered through making up a question. But we use 251 samples to draw a conclusion because a few answers are not enough to raise reliability of measurement and get useful results.
    We made use of statistical package named SPSS V.10.1 and LISREL 8.30 to verify a hypothesis practically. The ways of statistical analysis used this research are as follows.
    First, we used the LISREL analysis in the main and also used the SPSS V.10.1 analysis in the basic fields. Then, we revised data users' errors by basic frequency analysis and technical statistic analysis. We analyzed distributions of all items for a response as a basic data. Moreover, we applied the Cronbach's Alpha reliability calculation to explain reliability and appropriateness of empowering leadership, team commitment, innovative behaviors and organizational citizenship behaviors. To analyze appropriateness factors, we carried out searching cause analysis and conclusive cause analysis.
    Second, Linear Structure Relation Analysis was carried out to verify the relationship between organizational concepts. That can show us what both direct and indirect effects are.
    Third, we used the technique named Multi-Regression analysis to realize the relation between subordinate standards about empowering leadership and innovative behaviors
    Fourth, we practiced -Regression analysis to verify the relation between innovative organizational citizenship behaviors and team commitment.
    The main results of this research is as follows.
    First, carrying out convariance structure analysis to verify the appropriateness of this model is possible to analyze the structure model. Subordinate variables of empowering leadership have a positive effect on team commitment. And team commitment has a positive influence on innovative behaviors and organizational citizenship behaviors.
    Second, leading by example, coaching and providing informing are especially useful for innovative behaviors among subordinate variables of empowering leadership. It means that leaders should take the lead in carrying out their duties and share the needed informing with organization members to induce innovative behaviors
    Third, following factors - leading by example, participation in decision making, providing informing and interaction with team members - have an influence on sportsmanship, altruism, politeness and citizenship that are subordinate variables of organizational citizenship behaviors.
    Fourth, after verifying the mediation effects of team commitment as an influence which empowering leadership gives to innovative behaviors, almost all variables of empowering leadership are so related with team commitment that they have an effect on innovative behaviors.
    Finally, after verifying the mediation effects of team commitment as an influence which empowering leadership gives to organizational citizenship behaviors, all following factors - leading by example, coaching, participation in decision making, careful concern, interaction with team members and providing informing - can mediate team commitment. As a result, they have an effect on sportsmanship, altruism, politeness and citizenship that are subordinate variables of organizational citizenship behaviors.
    There are some expectation effects through this research. First, we can get conceptualization of empowering leadership and appropriateness of organizational concept. Second, we can decide the appropriateness about the role of empowering leadership. Third, we will be able to present practical principles about organization operation plans. Consequently, we can obtain the basic foundation for achieving high performance organization from theoretical and practical point of view through this research.
    번역하기

    Leadership has been dealt as one of central matters in the business field. Many companies in Korea, especially the big corporations, have introduced a lot of organizational innovation programs to cope with the international atmosphere making a feature...

    Leadership has been dealt as one of central matters in the business field. Many companies in Korea, especially the big corporations, have introduced a lot of organizational innovation programs to cope with the international atmosphere making a feature of limitless competition and glottalization since 1990. Due to changes of organizational atmosphere influencing the study of leadership, we come to need new paradigm about leadership. Recently, a variety of theories about leadership have come out.
    The cause of studying new theories about leadership is related with the changes of business atmosphere. Businesses have changed their atmosphere seeking stable efficiency into flexible and innovative atmosphere that is suitable for the rapidly changing world situation. Therefore, individual abilities of organization members are considered as one of the most important factors. Gradually, we emphasize leader's role influencing to organization members in a little different style comparing with the way used in the past.
    In harmony with situation emphasizing leadership, this research will show the conceptual system about empowering leadership, which doesn't have theoretical frame yet. Also we are going to investigate the extent of influence in the team-effectiveness dimension when organization members would recognize empowering leadership. But, the process from perceiving empowering leadership to taking actions is so complicated. For that reason, this research will study complicated psychological process in detail.
    Specific aims of this research is as follows.
    First, we will examine the existing researches about empowering leadership. On the basis of them, we will search out the relation between recognition of empowering leadership and innovative and organizational citizenship behaviors.
    Second, we will practically examine how much can recognition of empowering leadership directly related with innovative behaviors and team commitment explain innovative behaviors and what mediation roles are done.
    Third, we will also practically examine how much can recognition of empowering leadership directly related with organizational citizenship behaviors and team commitment explain organizational citizenship behaviors and what mediation roles are done.
    Fourth, we will verify the validity of the model planned this research through examining the influencing power of subordinate variables of empowering leadership which has effect on innovative behaviors and organizational citizenship behaviors.
    Finally, we will present administrative implication that helps you to raise the level of innovative behaviors and organizational citizenship behaviors through analyzing concepts of empowering leadership on the basis of results of previous researches.
    We distributed questionnaires related with this research to workers who were employed in an bank and in a financial institution from October 14th to November 10th in 2005. There are 287 samples gathered through making up a question. But we use 251 samples to draw a conclusion because a few answers are not enough to raise reliability of measurement and get useful results.
    We made use of statistical package named SPSS V.10.1 and LISREL 8.30 to verify a hypothesis practically. The ways of statistical analysis used this research are as follows.
    First, we used the LISREL analysis in the main and also used the SPSS V.10.1 analysis in the basic fields. Then, we revised data users' errors by basic frequency analysis and technical statistic analysis. We analyzed distributions of all items for a response as a basic data. Moreover, we applied the Cronbach's Alpha reliability calculation to explain reliability and appropriateness of empowering leadership, team commitment, innovative behaviors and organizational citizenship behaviors. To analyze appropriateness factors, we carried out searching cause analysis and conclusive cause analysis.
    Second, Linear Structure Relation Analysis was carried out to verify the relationship between organizational concepts. That can show us what both direct and indirect effects are.
    Third, we used the technique named Multi-Regression analysis to realize the relation between subordinate standards about empowering leadership and innovative behaviors
    Fourth, we practiced -Regression analysis to verify the relation between innovative organizational citizenship behaviors and team commitment.
    The main results of this research is as follows.
    First, carrying out convariance structure analysis to verify the appropriateness of this model is possible to analyze the structure model. Subordinate variables of empowering leadership have a positive effect on team commitment. And team commitment has a positive influence on innovative behaviors and organizational citizenship behaviors.
    Second, leading by example, coaching and providing informing are especially useful for innovative behaviors among subordinate variables of empowering leadership. It means that leaders should take the lead in carrying out their duties and share the needed informing with organization members to induce innovative behaviors
    Third, following factors - leading by example, participation in decision making, providing informing and interaction with team members - have an influence on sportsmanship, altruism, politeness and citizenship that are subordinate variables of organizational citizenship behaviors.
    Fourth, after verifying the mediation effects of team commitment as an influence which empowering leadership gives to innovative behaviors, almost all variables of empowering leadership are so related with team commitment that they have an effect on innovative behaviors.
    Finally, after verifying the mediation effects of team commitment as an influence which empowering leadership gives to organizational citizenship behaviors, all following factors - leading by example, coaching, participation in decision making, careful concern, interaction with team members and providing informing - can mediate team commitment. As a result, they have an effect on sportsmanship, altruism, politeness and citizenship that are subordinate variables of organizational citizenship behaviors.
    There are some expectation effects through this research. First, we can get conceptualization of empowering leadership and appropriateness of organizational concept. Second, we can decide the appropriateness about the role of empowering leadership. Third, we will be able to present practical principles about organization operation plans. Consequently, we can obtain the basic foundation for achieving high performance organization from theoretical and practical point of view through this research.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 제1장 서론 = 1
    • 제1절 문제의 제기 및 연구의 필요성 = 1
    • 제2절 연구의 목적 = 2
    • 제3절 연구의 방법 및 구성 = 4
    • 제2장 이론적 배경 = 6
    • 제1장 서론 = 1
    • 제1절 문제의 제기 및 연구의 필요성 = 1
    • 제2절 연구의 목적 = 2
    • 제3절 연구의 방법 및 구성 = 4
    • 제2장 이론적 배경 = 6
    • 제1절 리더십 이론의 최근 흐름 및 임파워링 리더십 = 6
    • 제2절 팀 몰입 = 16
    • 제3절 혁신행동 = 21
    • 제4절 조직시민행동 = 29
    • 제3장 연구모형 및 가설설정 = 45
    • 제1절 연구모형 = 45
    • 제2절 연구가설 설정 = 47
    • 제3절 변수의 조작적 정의 = 53
    • 제4절 설문구성 및 분석방법 = 57
    • 제4장 실증분석 = 59
    • 제1절 기초자료 분석 = 59
    • 제2절 신뢰도 분석 및 타당성 분석 = 61
    • 제3절 전체적인 가설검증 = 75
    • 제4절 세부적 가설검증 = 80
    • 제5장 결론 = 98
    • 제1절 연구결과의 요약 및 시사점 = 98
    • 제2절 연구의 한계점과 앞으로의 연구방향 = 102
    • 참고문헌 = 103
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1. Woker Teams, Sundstrom, Meuse, Futrell, , 1990

    2. Super Leadership, 김남현, Super-Leadership, , 2002

    3. Why teams matter, Smith, Katzenbach, , 1992

    4. Thriving on Chaos, Peters, Thriving on Chaos, , 1988

    5. The Change Masters, Kanter, The Change Masters, , 1983

    6. Management(7th ed.), Robbins, Coulter, , 2007

    7. Individual Innovation, Farr, Ford, , 1990

    8. Predictable Creativity, Gryskiewicz, , 1985

    9. Self-Directed Work Team, Ze nge r, Orsburn, Musselwhite, Moran, , 1990

    10. ToolsForTeam Excellence, Huszczo, Tools for Team Excellence, , 1996

    1. Woker Teams, Sundstrom, Meuse, Futrell, , 1990

    2. Super Leadership, 김남현, Super-Leadership, , 2002

    3. Why teams matter, Smith, Katzenbach, , 1992

    4. Thriving on Chaos, Peters, Thriving on Chaos, , 1988

    5. The Change Masters, Kanter, The Change Masters, , 1983

    6. Management(7th ed.), Robbins, Coulter, , 2007

    7. Individual Innovation, Farr, Ford, , 1990

    8. Predictable Creativity, Gryskiewicz, , 1985

    9. Self-Directed Work Team, Ze nge r, Orsburn, Musselwhite, Moran, , 1990

    10. ToolsForTeam Excellence, Huszczo, Tools for Team Excellence, , 1996

    11. The design of Work teams, Hackman, J. R., , 1987

    12. LISREL 구조방정식모델, 배병렬, , 2006

    13. 사회과학 조사방법론, 채서일, 法文社, , 1990

    14. Empowerment: A matter of degree, Fottler, Ford, , 1995

    15. LISREL 8: User’s reference guide, Joreskog, K. G, , 2001

    16. Prosocial Organizational Behaviors, Brief, Stephan J.Motowildo, Prosocial Organizational Behaviors, , 1986

    17. Is Slack Good or Bad for Innovation?, Nohria, Gulati, , 1996

    18. Champions of Technological Innovation, Higgins, Howwell, , 1990

    19. Toward a Psychology ofDyadic Organizing, Grean, Scandura, , 1987

    20. Profile of Commitment: An Empirical Test, Billing, Becker, , 1993

    21. Creativity, intelligence, and personality, Barron, Harrington, "Creativity, , 1981

    22. S ocial Psy chology of Organization 2nd ed, L.R.Kahn, Katz, Social Psychology of Organization (2nd ed.), , 1978

    23. Measuring Manufacturing Work Group Autonomy, Adiga, Bailey, , 1997

    24. Personality, affect, and behavior in groups, George, "Personality, , 1990

    25. Handbook of Leadership: A Survey ofLiterature, Stogdill, Handbook of Leadership: A Survey of Literature, , 1974

    26. Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectation, Bass,B.M., Leadership and Performance beyond Expectation, , 1985

    27. TheMotivationalBasisforOrganizationalBehavior, Katz, The Motivational Basis for Organizational Behavior, , 1964

    28. An Essay on Organizational CitizenshipBehavior, Gramham J.W, , 1991

    29. 정보화 시대의 새로운 경영 리더십, 이상호, 한국인사관리학회, "「인사관리 연구」, , 2004

    30. Calculativeness, Trust, andEconomic Organization, Williamson, Credibel Commitments, "Calculativeness, , 1993

    31. Principle of Management (2nd ed.), CA: Home Wood, Terry, "Principle of Management (2nd ed.), , 1960

    32. Managing for Creativity : Back to Basics on R & D, Galssman, , 1986

    33. Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings,4th ed.,, Hair, W.Black, "Multivariate Data Analysis With Readings, , 1995

    34. Creating Healthy Workplaces: The Supervisor's Role, Gillbreath, , 2004

    35. An evolutionary approach to creativity and innovation, Staw, An Evolutionary Approach to Creativity and Innovation, , 1990

    36. Controlling the Performance of People in Organizations, Slocum, Kerr, , 1981

    37. Managerial Leadership: A Review of Theory and Research, Yukl, Managerial Leadership : A Review of Theory and Research, , 1989

    38. 임파워먼트의 개념정립 및 실천방법 모색, 박원우, , 1997

    39. 혁신행동의 선행요인에 관한 실증적 연구, 이인석, 韓國人事管理學會, "「인사관리연구」, , 1999

    40. Handbook of leadership : a survey of theory and research, Stogdill, Ralph Melvin, The Free Press, Handbook of Leadership: A Survey of Theory and Research, , 1981

    41. OCB : Construct Redefinition, Measurement and Validation, Dienesch, Graham.J.W, Van Dyne, "OCB : Construct Redefinition, , 1994

    42. Self-Regulation Work Groups: A Socio-Technical Synthesis, Cummings, , 1978

    43. The Empowerment Process : IntegratingTheory and Practice, R.N.Kanungo, J.A.Conger, The Empowerment Process: Integrating Theory and Practice, , 1988

    44. Adaptors and innovators: Problem solvers in organizations, Kirton, Adaptors and Innovators : Problem Solvers in Organizations, , 1988

    45. Successful and Unsuccessful Innovator: Planned Innovation, Rothwell, , 1979

    46. A predictive model of self-managing work team effectiveness, Ledford, Spreitzer, Cohen, , 1996

    47. Outcomesofautonomousworkgroups:A long-term field experiment, Wall, , 1986

    48. A review and reconceptualization of organizationalcommitment, Richter, A Review and Reconceptualization of Organizational Commitment, , 1985

    49. Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work, Oldham, Employee Creativity : Personal and Contextual Factors at Work, , 1996

    50. Retaliation Against Whistle Blowers : Predictors and Effects, Miceli, Near, , 1986

    51. The effectiveness of self-managing teams: A quasi-experiment, Cohen, Ledford, , 1994

    52. Groups and Productivity: Analyzing the Effectiveness of Teams, Decadas, Griffin Hughson, Goodman, , 1988

    53. New Products Management for the 1980s. New York : Booz, Allen, Booz, Hamilton, "New Products Management for the 1980s. New York : Booz, , 1982

    54. The Relationship between Job Performance and Job Satisfaction, Williams, Podsakoff, , 1986

    55. Organizational citizenship behavior: It's nature and antecedents, Van Dyne, Dienesch, Organizational Citizenship Behavior : Its Nature and Antecedents, , 1994

    56. Support, Commitment, and Employee Outcomes in a Team Environment, Sott, Burroughs, Bishop, "Support, , 2000

    57. Interactional Psychology and Research on Behavior in Organization, Terborg.J, , 1981

    58. Managing Human Resource Issues for High-Contact Service Personnel, Tansik, , 1990

    59. Career-Oriented Versus Team-Oriented Commitment and Behavior at Work, Gild, , 1998

    60. Good-bye, Command and Control. In F. Hesselbein and P. M. Cohen (Eds.), Wheatley, "Good-bye, , 1999

    61. Foci and Bases of Employee Commitment :Implications for Job Performance, Eveleth, Nicole, , 1996

    62. Role Definitions and OCB : The Importance of The Employee's Perspective, Morrison, , 1996

    63. Substitutes for Leadership: Some Implications for Organizational Design, Kerr, , 1977

    64. Concept Redundancy in Organizational Research: The Case of Work Commitment, Morrw, Concept Redundancy in Organizational Research: The Case of Work Commitment, , 1983

    65. A Vertical Dyads Linkage Approach to Leadership within Formal Organizations, Dansereau, , 1975

    66. Employee-Organizational Linkages: The psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism, Steers, Mowday, Porter, "Employee-Organizational Linkages: The psychology of Commitment, , 1982

    67. AnexaminationoforganizationalandTeam Commitmentinaself-DirectedTeam Environment, Bishop, An Examination of Organizational and Team Commitment in a Self-Directed Team Environment, , 2000

    68. Symbolic and Interactional Perspectives on Leadership: An Integrative Framework, Skivington, Moorhead, Griffin, , 1987

    69. 임파워링 리더 행위 구성요인의 차원성에 대한 탐색적 연구, 이재원, , 2005

    70. The Impact of Organizational Behavior on Evaluations of Salespersons Performance, Mackenzie, Posdskoff, Fetter, , 1993

    71. LMX의 질과 조직몰입 및 조직시민행동간 리더행동의 조절효과, 백기복, 강영순, 김정훈, 韓國人事管理學會, LMX의 질과 조직몰입 및 조직시민행동간 리더행동의 조절효과, , 2001

    72. 신뢰가 조직시민행동과 공유학습에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구, 김양호, 대한경영학회, 경희대학교 박사학위 논문, , 2003

    73. Psychological Empowerment in the Workplace: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation, Spritzer, "Psychological Empowerment in the Workplace: Dimensions, , 1995

    74. Self-management as a substitute for leadership A social learning theory perspective, Manz C. C. and Sims H. P. Jr, , 1980

    75. Speeding Products to Market : Waiting Time to New Product Introduction in New Firms, Lyman, Schoonhoven, , 1990

    76. Cognitive Elements of Empowerment: An Interpretive Model on Intrinsic Task Motivation, Thomas, , 1990

    77. Commitment to The Union: Development of A Measure and An Examination of Its Correlates, W.E.Spiller, Gordon, , 1980

    78. Leading workers to lead themselves:The external leadership of self-managing work teams, Manz, Sims, , 1987

    79. 팀 몰입과 조직시민행동의 선행요인과 역할 외 행동에 관한 연구, 김영용, , 2001

    80. Self-leadership: toward an expanded theory of self-influence processes in organizations, Manz, Sims, Self-Leadership: Toward an Expanded Theory of Self-Influence Processes in Organizations, , 1986

    81. Themultidimensionalview ofcommitmentandthetheoryofreasonedaction:A comparativeevaluation, Becker, , 1995

    82. Determinants of innovative behavior: A pathmodel of individual innovation in the workplace, Bruce, Scott, Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace, , 1994

    83. Job Satisfaction and the Good Solier : The Relationship between Affect and Employee Citizenship, Organ, Bateman, , 1983

    84. Multidimensionality of Leader-member Exchange: An Empirical Assesment through Scale Development, Liden, Maslyn, , 1998

    85. The Effects ofLeader-Member Exchange on Employee Citizenship and Impression Management Behavior, Waynes.S.J.and S.A.Green, The Effects of Leader-Member Exchange on Employee Citizenship and Impression Management Behavior, , 1993

    86. Defining and measuring empowering leader behaviors: Development of an upward feedback instrument, Damian, Lee, Michael, Defining and Measuring Empowering Leader Behaviors: Development of an Upward Feedback Instrument, , 2000

    87. Task Interdependence and Extra-Role Behavior : A Test of Mediating Effects of Felt Responsibility, Pearce, Gregerson, , 1991

    88. Bass and Stogdill's handbook of leadership: Theo-ry, research and managerial applications (3rd ed.), Bass, "Bass and Stogdill's Hand Book of Leadership: Theory, , 1990

    89. The Effects of Transformational Leadershipon Teacher Attitudes and Student Performance in Singapore, W.L.Koh, J.R.Terborge, The Effects of Transformational Leadership on Teacher Attitudes and Student Performance in Singapore, , 1995

    90. Whenathousandflowersbloom:Structural,collective,andsocial conditions for innovation in organization, Kanter, "When a Thousand Flowers Bloom : Structural, , 1988

    91. Extra-Role Behavior : In Pursuit of Construct and Definitional Clarity (A bridge over muddied waters), Van Dyne, Parks, , 1995

    92. Innovative Genius: A Framework for Relation Individual and Organizational Intelligences to Innovation, Glynn, , 1996

    93. Moderating effects of initial leader-member exchange status on the effects of a leadership intervention, ura, Graen, , 1984

    94. Person Environment Fit and Creativity: An Examination of Supply-Value and Demand-Ability Versions of Fit, Nelson, Barr.S.H, Livingstone, , 1997

    95. Feeling Good-doing Good: A ConceptualAnalysis of the Mood at Work-Organizational Spontaneity Relationship, Goerge, Feeling Good-Doing Good : A Conceptual Analysis of the Mood at Work-Organizational Spontaneity Relationship, , 1992

    96. Justice as a mediator of the relationshipbetween methods ofmonitoring and organizational citizenshipbehavior, Niheoff, Moorman, , 1993

    97. 조직구성원의 조직시민행동과 개인특성, 직무특성 및 태도간의 관계에 관한 연구, 송경수, 박봉규, 김남현, "조직구성원의 조직시민행동과 개인특성, , 1999

    98. Contexts for Organizational Citizenship Behavior:Do High Performing and Satisfying Units have Better Citizens, Karambayya, "Contexts for Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Do High Performing and Satisfying Units Have Better ""Citizens", , 1989

    99. Architecture Innovation : The Recognition of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firm, Henderson, , 1990

    100. The Leadership Management Distinction : The Domination and Displacement of Mechanistic and Organismic Theories, Terry, , 1995

    101. Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: implications for designing effective work groups, Medsker.J.G, Higgs.A, Campion.M.A, , 1993

    102. 혁신행위에 영향을 미치는 개인성격과 작업환경 : R&D 연구원 및 기술인력을 중심으로, 한인수, , 1999

    103. Social exchange inorganizations: perceived organizational support, leader-memberexchange, and employee reciprocity, N.Bennett, R.C.Liden, Settoon, "Social Exchange in Organizations: Perceived Organizational Support, , 1996

    104. A Theory of Charismatic Leadership, In J. G. Hunt and L. L. Larson (Eds.), "Leadership: The Cutting Edge," Carbondale, House, "A Theory of Charismatic Leadership, , 1977

    105. An Empirical Examination of Leader-Member Exchange and Transformational Leadership as Predictor of Innovative Behavior, Basu, , 1991

    106. A 1976 Theory of Charismatic Leadership, In J. G. Hunt and L. L. Larson(Eds.), Leadership: The Cutting Edge. Carbondale, House, "A 1976 Theory of Charismatic Leadership, , 1977

    107. Wokers' Reactions to Autonomous Work Groups-Conditioning for Functioning, Differential Effects, and Individual Differences, Cummings, Griggs, "Wokers' Reactions to Autonomous Work Groups-Conditioning for Functioning, , 1977

    108. 경영학계의 주요 리더십이론 및 국내 연구동향 : 세 가지의 리더십 관점에서의 검토 및 제안, 이상호, 경영학계의 주요 리더십 이론 및 국내 연구동향 : 세 가지의 리더십 관점에서의 검토 및 제안, , 2001

    109. 분배 절차, 상호작용 공정성이 상사에 대한 신뢰, 조직지원인식 및조직시민행동에 미치는 영향, 정홍술, "분배?절차?상호작용공정성이 상사에 대한 신뢰, , 2002

    110. The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychology Research: Conceptual, Strategic and Statistical Considerations, Baron, Kenny, "The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychology Research: Conceptual, , 1986

    111. 조직재구축의 새로운 패러다임-프로세스조직, 팀조직, 네트워크조직, 학습조직의 통합론적 고찰,, 김명형, 송상호, "조직재구축의 새로운 패러다임-프로세스조직, , 1996

    112. Following the leader in R&D: The joint effect of subordinate problem-solving style and leader-member relations on innovative behavior, Scott, R.A.Bruce, , 1998

    113. Relationship between OrganizationalJustice andOrganizationalCitizenship Behaviors:Do Fairness Perceptions InfluenceEmployeeCitizenship, Moorman, Relationship between Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors : Do Fairness Perceptions Influence Employee Citizenship, , 1991

    114. 문제해결 스타일, 리더 멤버간의 교환관계, 태도 및 경쟁압력에 대한 지각과 혁신적인 행동간의 관계, 백영미, 김성국, "문제해결 스타일, , 2000

    115. Innovation at Work. In West, .M. A., and Farr, J. L. (Eds.), Innovation and Creativity at Work: Psychological and Organizational Strategies, West, Farr, "Innovation at Work. In West, , 1990

    116. An examination of themediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations betweenthe job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes, Wayne, Sparrow, Liden, "An Examination of The Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment on the Relations between the Job, , 2000

    117. 집단 응집성, 상사에 대한 신뢰, 직무만족이 팀 몰입과 조직몰입을 통해 조직시민행동 및 역할 내 행동에 미치는 간접효과에 관한 연구, 서재현, "집단 응집성, , 2003

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼