소년범죄와 학교폭력 예방을 위한 회복적 사법의 도입에 관한 연구 = A Study of the Introduction of Restorative Justice for the Prevention of School Violence and Juvenile Crime

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Today the seriousness of Juvenile Crime exceeded its tolerable level. Specially, it has been showing increasing trend of student suicide caused by school violences. As a result, the government authority has announced a countermeasure to protect victim students of school violence at the same time to punish the students responsible severely. However, such policies could not have resolved school violence including Juvenile Crime as yet and for which, there could have number of reasons, but it is deemed to have problems in the treatment of Juvenile Crime. Thus, the aim of this article intends to urge introduction of the Restorative Justice which has been discussed in the academic society so far and proposing an implementation method of it in the treatment of Juvenile Crime. The Restorative Justice is intended to settle the case through participation by victim, regional society that has been resolved only by government, offenders. What kind of punishment is appropriate with regard to the method to prevent juvenile Criminal is still divided between severe punishment policy and protective policy, but protective policy still prevails. Recently, there has been indicating increasing number of people inclining to the necessity of severe punishment policy in view of cruelness, increased lower age of juvenile crime. However, expert viewed that such strengthened criminal punishment is not only non-educational and dangerous countermeasure that has no practical benefit but also has no preventive or reclaim effect. On the contrary, they view that it could have a negative effect by producing large number of juvenile criminals as it deprives too early their 2nd chance to correct their life through education. Therefore, juvenile criminals be punished based on protective policy however if the process is focused to the damage compensation, sincere apology by the offender parties, and ensued victim`s forgiveness then it could be regarded helpful in preventing juvenile crime. In other word, let the crime be resolved through dialogue by the participation of offender student and its family member, victim student and its family member, local expert mediator etc. As being a Practice Model, it seems to be appropriate the Victim-Offender mediation program: VOMP, the Family Group Conference And the timing of practice for such method appears to be proper when the decisions were taken such as Dismission with Caution by police, or conditional Suspension of indictment by Prosecutors under the condition of improvement guidance, or Protective Disposition sentence by the court. Specially, most cases of Protective disposition in the juvenile court indicated Nol. disposition of return to home, whereas No.9 & No.10 disposition of sent to Youth detention center indicated very few cases. Thus, upon sentencing disposition No.1 that shares the majority cases, it seems to be desirable to be given generous punishment provided there indicated a sincere apology and forgiveness between offender and victim overriding formal agreement through regret and pecuniary compensation. In conclusion, it is deemed the best method in preventing juvenile crime to make punishment based on whether Restorative Justice is employed.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박상식, "회복적 사법에 관한 연구" 경상대학교 대학원 2004

2 이호중, "회복적 사법-이념과 법이론적 쟁점들-" 한국피해자학회 9 (9): 2001

3 박상식, "형사화해ㆍ조정의 필요성" 법학연구소 17 (17): 87-109, 2009

4 국회입법조사처, "형사조정제도의 운영 현황과 개선과제" NARS 2012

5 장규원, "형사조정제도의 실효성 확보방안 연구" 한국피해자학회 16 (16): 31-50, 2008

6 이승현, "현행 학교폭력 법제의 문제점 및 단기대응방안" 한국형사정책연구원 2012

7 박광민, "한국의 소년범죄의 동향과 그 대책" 한국비교형사법학회 10 (10): 451-474, 2008

8 오경식, "한국의 回復的 少年司法에 관한 연구" 한국비교형사법학회 10 (10): 513-536, 2008

9 박수선, "한국에서의 회복적 사법 ‘피해자 가해자 대회 모임’ 시범운영 사례" 2010

10 정현미, "학교폭력 어떻게 할 것인가!" 2012

11 정재준, "청소년비행예방을 우한 소년보호기관의 역할확대 및 강화방안" 한국형사정책연구원 2003

12 여성가족부, "청소년 백서" 2011

13 "조선일보"

14 이영훈, "재판에서의 회복적 사법의 현재와 미래" 법학연구소 14 (14): 69-86, 2009

15 이영란, "소년사법절차에 관한 연구 -소년경찰의 다이버전을 중심으로-" 한국소년정책학회 15 : 1-30, 2010

16 이순래, "소년사법의 현황과 소년범죄에 대한 대응전략" 한국형사정책연구원 18 (18): 1047-1080, 2007

17 이승현, "소년보호이념의 변화경향에 관한 고찰" 법학연구소 24 (24): 131-150, 2007

18 崔炳珏, "소년보호사건의 범위와 처리에 관한 연구" 서울大學校 大學院 1998

19 정희철, "소년법상 화해권고제도의 운영방안과 문제점" 한국소년정책학회 17 : 91-113, 2011

20 선의종, "소년법상 화해권고제도의 실질적 운영방안, In 가사재판 연구 Ⅱ" 서울가정법원가사재판연구회 2011

21 이진국, "소년 다이버전의 법적 쟁점에 관한 소고" 한국형사정책연구원 17 (17): 67-98, 2006

22 원혜욱, "새로 도입되는 소년법 개정안" 23 (23): 2007

23 이민수, "상담조사 및 기소 결정전 조사에 있어서 회복적 사법 도입에 관한 연구" 9 : 2009

24 "법률신문"

25 이순래, "범죄현상에 대한 새로운 분석들" (9) : 2000

26 대검찰청, "범죄분석" 2011

27 "국민일보"

28 "경찰청통계연보 제53호"

29 조국, "경찰보호조치와 훈방조치의 법적 근거 및 한계에 관한 연구" 치안연구소 2003

30 이수정, "경찰단계에서의 소년범 위험성 평가를 위한 비행촉발요인 조사도구 개발" 한국사회및성격심리학회 19 (19): 71-100, 2005

31 권봉관, "경찰단계 회복적 소년사법정책의 도입방안 연구" 창원대학교 대학원 2010

32 "경남신문"

33 오영근, "개정소년법의 과제와 전망" 한국형사정책연구원 19 (19): 5-24, 2008

34 이진국, "개정 소년법상 회복적 사법제도에 관한 비판적 검토" 한국피해자학회 17 (17): 355-375, 2009

35 김은경, "각국의 회복적 소년사법 정책동향" 형사정책연구원 2004

36 浜井浩一, "諸外國における犯罪被害者施策に關する硏究: オセアニアにおける犯罪被害者施策" 法務總合硏究所 (9) : 2000

37 前野育三, "被害者問題と修復的司法:ニュ-ジ-ランドのFamily Group Conferenceを中心に" (123) : 2002

38 崔鍾植, "少年法上 保護處分에 관한 硏究 : 우리나라 少年保護處分制度와 그 改善方案을 中心으로" 강원대학교 1996

39 染田惠, "回復的司法の理論的․實務的課題と日本における活用可能性" (127) : 2001

40 西村春夫, "回復的司法の理念と實踐" 日本刑法學會 41 (41): 2002

41 西村春夫, "回復的 司法の理念と實踐" 日本刑法學會 41 (41): 2002

42 高橋則夫, "修復的司法の探求" 成文堂 2003

43 Sara Sun Beale, "Still Tough on Crime? Prospects for Restorative Justice in the United States" (35) : 2002

44 Van Ness, "Restoring Justice" 1997

45 Leena Kurki, "Restorative and Community Justice in the United States" 27 : 2000

46 Mark Bakker, "Reparing the Breach and Reconciling the Discordant : Mediation in the Criminal Justice System" 72 : 1994

47 Leena Kurki, "Evaluating Restorative Justice Practices, In Restorative Justice & Criminal Justice" Hart Publishing 2003

48 김은경, "21세기 소년사법 개혁과 회복적 사법의 가치" 한국형사정책연구원 18 (18): 1159-1188, 2007