RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    스마트폰의 소비가치와 소비만족도에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Consumption Value and the Consumption Satisfaction of Smart Phone Users

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82687206

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study analyses the usage pattern and the consumption satisfaction and usage value of the smart phone users of the age of 20~40s. The socio-demographic factor, the usage pattern and the usage value of smart phone were selected as the elements affecting consumer satisfaction factors on smart phones. The difference between groups and its relative influences were analyzed with those elements. The results of this study were as follows; First, internet was the most favorite information source of purchasing of smart phones, and the information usage from the sales clerks and the articles on magazine or newspapers were ranked low. The information from the internet is filled with diverse information from commercial usage such as PR or advertising to comments from smart phone users. Thus, it is necessary to investigate the internet sites that consumers use and to analyze the specific contents of the information. Compared to receiving detailed information from other sources, consumers relatively rely lower on the information given from sales clerks. It means consumers need to receive useful product information and not just information that has commercial related intentions from product sellers. An in-depth analysis of the product information given to consumers before purchasing smart phones could contribute to consumers being more effectively informed and receiving detailed product information they wish to learn more about from different information sources. The 50% or more of smart phone users used their phones in the transportation or along/on the streets. The surfing web-site or searching information and entertainments were measured as the main functions of the smart phone usage. Consumers who use smart phones on average of two hours or less per day is the highest ranked which is about 36%. And also, consumers who use smart phones three hours or more show to be about 17%. A monthly average of the phone charge was 71,500. Second, A factor analysis results of smart phone usage extracted two factors of the enjoyment value and differentiate/symbolic value. The usage value of the smart phone showed difference between groups according to socio-demographic factors and usage patterns. The differentiate/ symbolic value was measured high with the 40s, the married and the professional practices. The enjoyment value was high with the married and the smart phone usage case of communication. Considering the short time of release for smart phones and the 93% of smart phone users within one year, the different consumer values with owning a smart phone such as a differentiate/symbolic value to an enjoyment value or another value needed to be examined. According to the usage period of smart phones, the consumption values and evaluation that may change over time is recognized by consumers. In other words, consumers who have a differentiate/symbolic value are more likely to recognize the enjoyment value while they use their smart phone and as they increase their usage period over time. Conversely, consumers who recognized the enjoyment value by using various smart phone applications may change to the differential value over increasing usage periods. Because the usage of smart phones and functions from applications changes their daily life, it comes to be unconsciously a part of their life. Third, the most important details when purchasing of smart phones were found to be A/S (After service), the products and the function. The importance was varied with groups. The women users ranked high with the A/S and the university/graduate students recognized high with the functions. A/S service (After Service being warranties or product replacement provided to consumers) is the most important purchasing factor for consumers when making a decision to buy a smart phone. It means that consumers know the poor A/S service as a risk factor which can reduce the benefits and satisfaction of using a smart phone. Consumer`s dissatisfaction comes from the psychological or economical inconvenience of the current inadequate A/S service. Therefore, it would be necessary to develop a more efficient A/S service and should notify consumers where they can receive this in the future. Forth, when consumption satisfaction analyses of smart phones were done with weight factor of the importance, the design and the function were highly satisfied, and the satisfaction of the price and the A/S were low. There were two contrasting views between the results of purchasing decision and the results of the consumer satisfaction of smart phones. This showed the consumption satisfaction would vary with the importance. The most important influential factor on the consumer satisfaction was enjoyment value, and the usage time, price and functional importance were significantly influenced on the satisfaction. Thus, it is verified that there are differences in usage patterns, values, and importance depending on socio-demographic factors. And also, these three decisive factors impact consumer satisfaction regarding smart phones.
    번역하기

    This study analyses the usage pattern and the consumption satisfaction and usage value of the smart phone users of the age of 20~40s. The socio-demographic factor, the usage pattern and the usage value of smart phone were selected as the elements affe...

    This study analyses the usage pattern and the consumption satisfaction and usage value of the smart phone users of the age of 20~40s. The socio-demographic factor, the usage pattern and the usage value of smart phone were selected as the elements affecting consumer satisfaction factors on smart phones. The difference between groups and its relative influences were analyzed with those elements. The results of this study were as follows; First, internet was the most favorite information source of purchasing of smart phones, and the information usage from the sales clerks and the articles on magazine or newspapers were ranked low. The information from the internet is filled with diverse information from commercial usage such as PR or advertising to comments from smart phone users. Thus, it is necessary to investigate the internet sites that consumers use and to analyze the specific contents of the information. Compared to receiving detailed information from other sources, consumers relatively rely lower on the information given from sales clerks. It means consumers need to receive useful product information and not just information that has commercial related intentions from product sellers. An in-depth analysis of the product information given to consumers before purchasing smart phones could contribute to consumers being more effectively informed and receiving detailed product information they wish to learn more about from different information sources. The 50% or more of smart phone users used their phones in the transportation or along/on the streets. The surfing web-site or searching information and entertainments were measured as the main functions of the smart phone usage. Consumers who use smart phones on average of two hours or less per day is the highest ranked which is about 36%. And also, consumers who use smart phones three hours or more show to be about 17%. A monthly average of the phone charge was 71,500. Second, A factor analysis results of smart phone usage extracted two factors of the enjoyment value and differentiate/symbolic value. The usage value of the smart phone showed difference between groups according to socio-demographic factors and usage patterns. The differentiate/ symbolic value was measured high with the 40s, the married and the professional practices. The enjoyment value was high with the married and the smart phone usage case of communication. Considering the short time of release for smart phones and the 93% of smart phone users within one year, the different consumer values with owning a smart phone such as a differentiate/symbolic value to an enjoyment value or another value needed to be examined. According to the usage period of smart phones, the consumption values and evaluation that may change over time is recognized by consumers. In other words, consumers who have a differentiate/symbolic value are more likely to recognize the enjoyment value while they use their smart phone and as they increase their usage period over time. Conversely, consumers who recognized the enjoyment value by using various smart phone applications may change to the differential value over increasing usage periods. Because the usage of smart phones and functions from applications changes their daily life, it comes to be unconsciously a part of their life. Third, the most important details when purchasing of smart phones were found to be A/S (After service), the products and the function. The importance was varied with groups. The women users ranked high with the A/S and the university/graduate students recognized high with the functions. A/S service (After Service being warranties or product replacement provided to consumers) is the most important purchasing factor for consumers when making a decision to buy a smart phone. It means that consumers know the poor A/S service as a risk factor which can reduce the benefits and satisfaction of using a smart phone. Consumer`s dissatisfaction comes from the psychological or economical inconvenience of the current inadequate A/S service. Therefore, it would be necessary to develop a more efficient A/S service and should notify consumers where they can receive this in the future. Forth, when consumption satisfaction analyses of smart phones were done with weight factor of the importance, the design and the function were highly satisfied, and the satisfaction of the price and the A/S were low. There were two contrasting views between the results of purchasing decision and the results of the consumer satisfaction of smart phones. This showed the consumption satisfaction would vary with the importance. The most important influential factor on the consumer satisfaction was enjoyment value, and the usage time, price and functional importance were significantly influenced on the satisfaction. Thus, it is verified that there are differences in usage patterns, values, and importance depending on socio-demographic factors. And also, these three decisive factors impact consumer satisfaction regarding smart phones.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 조광행, "점포충성도에 대한 전환장벽과 이용자만족의 영향력에 관한 실증적 연구" 28 (28): 127-149, 1999

    2 박철, "인터넷 정보탐색 가치가 인터넷 쇼핑행동에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 쇼핑몰 방문빈도와 구매의도를 중심으로" 15 (15): 143-162, 2000

    3 이유재, "이용자만족의 정의 및 측정에 관한 연구" 29 (29): 139-154, 1995

    4 권기대, "이동통신서비스산업의 서비스품질과 고객만족: 상품력과 관여도의 선행효과를 중심으로" 3 (3): 29-47, 2000

    5 고윤전, "아이폰 초기사용자 동행관찰을 통한 스마트폰 이용행태 변화에 관한 연구" 한국상품학회 28 (28): 111-120, 2010

    6 백준봉, "아이폰 시장 전망과 경제적 파급효과 분석" KT 경제경영연구소 2010

    7 이학식, "실용적/쾌락적 쇼핑가치와 쇼핑만족: 구조모델의 개발과 검정" 28 (28): 505-538, 1999

    8 삼성경제연구소, "스마트폰이 열어가는 미래" 2010

    9 김재영, "스마트폰과 소비자유형 전망" (11) : 2010

    10 양희조, "스마트폰 이용자의 이용과 충족에 관한 연구" 성균관대학교 2010

    1 조광행, "점포충성도에 대한 전환장벽과 이용자만족의 영향력에 관한 실증적 연구" 28 (28): 127-149, 1999

    2 박철, "인터넷 정보탐색 가치가 인터넷 쇼핑행동에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 쇼핑몰 방문빈도와 구매의도를 중심으로" 15 (15): 143-162, 2000

    3 이유재, "이용자만족의 정의 및 측정에 관한 연구" 29 (29): 139-154, 1995

    4 권기대, "이동통신서비스산업의 서비스품질과 고객만족: 상품력과 관여도의 선행효과를 중심으로" 3 (3): 29-47, 2000

    5 고윤전, "아이폰 초기사용자 동행관찰을 통한 스마트폰 이용행태 변화에 관한 연구" 한국상품학회 28 (28): 111-120, 2010

    6 백준봉, "아이폰 시장 전망과 경제적 파급효과 분석" KT 경제경영연구소 2010

    7 이학식, "실용적/쾌락적 쇼핑가치와 쇼핑만족: 구조모델의 개발과 검정" 28 (28): 505-538, 1999

    8 삼성경제연구소, "스마트폰이 열어가는 미래" 2010

    9 김재영, "스마트폰과 소비자유형 전망" (11) : 2010

    10 양희조, "스마트폰 이용자의 이용과 충족에 관한 연구" 성균관대학교 2010

    11 장은경, "스마트폰 이용만족도 영향요인에 관한 연구" 한국소비문화학회 13 (13): 129-145, 2010

    12 한국소비자원, "스마트폰 이용 만족도 비교정보 조사결과" 정보교육국 소비자정보팀 2010

    13 유재훈, "스마트폰 시대의 스마트마케팅" LG Business Insight 2010

    14 최원석, "스마트폰 기능적 속성의 중요도에 관한 연구" 고려대학교 2010

    15 정윤선, "스마트폰 AS 이대로는 안 된다"

    16 이상협, "소비자들의 이동전화 구매시 품질 평가와 소비자만족" 4 (4): 1-20, 2001

    17 김난도, "소비자는 무엇을 원하는가"

    18 최영진, "소비자 만족결정에 대한 실용적/쾌락적 결과와 가치의 영향; 인지적/감정적 관여도의 조정 작용" 홍익대학교 2006

    19 오지영, "모바일 폰 디자인요소에 대한 이용자 가치 연구" 이화여자대학교 2009

    20 서진혁, "모바일 인터넷 서비스 특성이 이용자 만족과 재이용 의도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 중앙대학교 2004

    21 신종칠, "모바일 무선인터넷 사용가치가 사용의도 및 사용시간에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 한국소비자학회 15 (15): 125-143, 2004

    22 오세조, "마케팅원론" 박영사 2010

    23 Babin, Barry J., "Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value" 20 (20): 644-656, 1994

    24 Rokeach, Milton, "The Nature of Human Values" The Free Press 1973

    25 Holbrook, Morris B., "The Nature of Customer Value : An Axiology of Services in the Consumption Experience in Service Quality: New Directions in Theory and Practice" Sage 21-71, 1994

    26 Oliver, Rechard L., "Satisfaction : A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer" McGraw-Hill 1997

    27 Hoffman, Donna L., "Marketing in Hypermedia Computer Mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations" 60 : 50-68, 1996

    28 Childers, Terry L., "Hedonic and Utilitarian Motivations for Online Retail Shopping Behavior" 77 (77): 511-535, 2001

    29 Hirschman, Elizabeth C., "Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods, and Proposition" 46 : 92-101, 1982

    30 Arnould, Eric J., "Consumers, second edition" McGraw-Hill 2004

    31 Holbrook, Morris B., "Consumer Value: A framework for Analysis and Research" Routledge 1999

    32 Engel, J. F., "Consumer Behavior(8th ed.)" The Dryden Press 1995

    33 매일경제신문, "2011년 대한민국 스마트폰 보급률 60%"

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.48 1.48 1.67
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.7 1.88 2.351 0.15
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼