상담자의 애착유형과 발달수준에 따른 역전이 관리능력의 차이 = Counselors' Attachment Type, Developmental Level, and Countertransference Management Ability

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study was to explorer differences in counselors' countertransference management ability depending on their attachment type and developmental level. Participants of this study were 91 counselors who were working at university counseling centers nationwide. Counselors were classified based on their attachment scores. Collected data were investigated by two-step cluster analysis, one-way ANOVAs and two-way ANOVAs. The results of the study were as follows. First, cluster analysis revealed three types of counselors' attachment: secure type, preoccupied-fearful type and dismissing type. There were significant differences in countertransference management ability depending on the counselor's attachment type. In all five subscales of countertransference management ability, secure type was higher than insecure type―preoccupied/fearful type and dismissing type―. Secondary, There were significant difference of countertransference management ability depending on counselor's type of attachment and development level such as academic degree, the number of years of personal counseling experience, the level of counseling certificate. The interactional effects of counselor's type of attachment and academic degree were emerged at self-insight, self-integration, and anxiety-management. The interactional effects of counselor's type of attachment and the number of years of personal counseling experience were emerged at anxiety-management. And the interactional effects of counselor's type of attachment and the level of counseling certificate were emerged at empathy ability, self-integration, anxiety-management, and conceptualizing skills.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구는 상담자의 애착유형과 발달수준에 따라 역전이 관리능력에 차이가 있는지 살펴보는 데 그 목적이 있다. 연구를 위해 전국에 소재한 12개 대학의 학생상담센터에 근무 중인 상담자를 대상으로 친밀관계경험 검사와 역전이 관리능력 검사를 실시하였다. 수집된 자료에 대하여 이단계 군집분석을 통해 상담자의 애착유형을 분류한 후, 분산분석을 통해 애착유형과 발달수준(학력, 경력, 자격증수준)에 따라 역전이 관리능력에서 차이가 있는지 살펴보았다. 분석 결과는 다음과 같았다. 첫째, 상담자의 애착유형은 안정형, 몰입-공포형, 거부형의 세 유형으로 분류되었다. 둘째, 상담자의 역전이 관리능력(자기통찰, 공감능력, 자기통합, 불안관리, 개념화 기술)은 상담자의 애착유형에 따라 유의한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 즉, 안정형이 불안정형―몰입-공포형, 거부형―보다 역전이 관리능력의 점수가 유의하게 높은 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 상담자의 애착유형과 발달수준에 따른 역전이 관리능력의 차이를 분석한 결과, 상담자 애착유형과 학력의 상호작용 효과는 자기통찰, 자기통합, 불안관리와 같이 심리내적 변인에서 유의한 것으로 나타났다. 한편 상담자의 애착유형과 경력수준의 상호작용 효과는 불안관리에서 유의하였고, 상담자의 애착유형과 자격수준의 상호작용 효과는 공감능력, 자기통합, 불안관리, 개념화 기술에서 유의한 것으로 나타났다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김성현, "친밀관계 경험 검사 개정판 타당화 연구: 확증적 요인분석과 문항반응이론을 중심으로" 서울대학교 2004

2 최해연, "정서강도, 정서주의, 정서명료성, 및 정서표현양가성의 군집과 심리적 적응의 관계" 한국사회및성격심리학회 22 (22): 59-73, 2008

3 이동귀, "잠재적 프로파일 분석을 통한 애착 유형 분류" 한국사회및성격심리학회 23 (23): 55-67, 2009

4 장세미, "상담자의 특성, 역전이 관리 능력 및 상태불안의 관계" 가톨릭대학교 1999

5 윤정설, "상담자의 성격특성 및 경력이 역전이 행동에 미치는 영향: 자기효능감을 매개변인으로" 연세대학교 2002

6 김수정, "상담자, 내담자 애착유형이 작업동맹에 미치는 영향" 이화여자대학교 2005

7 김정은, "상담자 애착유형과 심리적 불편감 및 지각된 사회적 지지와의 관계에서 사회적 자기효능감, 정서적 자각의 매개효과 검증" 이화여자대학교 2007

8 심홍섭, "상담자 발달수준 평가에 관한 연구" 10 (10): 1-28, 1998

9 허미연, "놀이치료자의 성인애착이 역전이 행동에 미치는 영향에서 상담자 발달수준의 매개효과" 숙명여자대학교 2006

10 김현주, "놀이치료자의 성인애착 및 상담자 발달수준과 치료적 동맹의 관계" 숙명여자대학교 2007

11 Rholes, W. S., "Working models of attachment, support giving, and support seeking in a stressful situation" 93 (93): 466-477, 2002

12 William, C., "Transitional object and borderline personality disorder" 154 (154): 250-255, 1997

13 Rubino, G., "Therapist empathy and depth of interpretation in response to potential alliance ruptures: The role of therapist and patient attachment styles" 10 (10): 408-420, 2000

14 Dozier, M., "The role of attachment in therapeutic relationships. in: Attachment theory and close relationships" Guilford Press 221-248, 1998

15 Horvath, A. O., "The development of the WAI. in: The psychotherapeutic research process: A research handbook" Guilford press 529-556, 1986

16 Freidman, S. M., "The development of the Inventory of Countertransference Behavior" 56 (56): 1221-1235, 2000

17 Brennan, K. A., "Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. in: Attachment theory and close relationships" Guilford Press 46-76, 1998

18 Hazen, C., "Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process" 52 (52): 511-524, 1987

19 Norcross, J. C., "Psychotherapy relationship that work" Oxford University Press 2002

20 Orlinsky, D. E., "Process and outcome in psychotherapy: Noch einmal. in: Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change" Wiley 1994

21 Robbins, S. B., "Managing countertransference feelings: An interactional model using awareness of feeling and theoretical framework" 34 (34): 276-282, 1987

22 Stoltenberg, C. D., "IDM Supervision: An integrated developmental model for supervising counselors and therapists" Jessey-Bass 1998

23 Highlen, P. S., "Factors affecting client change in individual counseling: Current status and theoretical speculations. in: Handbook of counseling psychology" John Wiley & Sons 334-396, 1984

24 Lopez, F. G., "Dynamic processes underlying adult attachment organization: Toward an attachment theoretical perspective on the healthy and effective self" 47 (47): 283-300, 2000

25 Horvath, A. O., "Development and validation of the WAI" 36 (36): 139-149, 1989

26 Ligiéro, D. P., "Countertransference, attachment, and the working alliance: The therapist's contributions" 39 (39): 3-11, 2002

27 Gelso, C. J., "Countertransference management and therapy outcome" 58 (58): 861-867, 2002

28 Hayes, J. A., "Countertransference behavior and management in brief counseling: A field study" 7 (7): 145-153, 1997

29 Van Wagoner, S. L., "Countertransference and the reputedly excellent therapist" 28 (28): 411-421, 1991

30 Peabody, S. A., "Countertransference and empathy: The complex relationship between two divergent concepts in counseling" 29 (29): 240-245, 1982

31 Gelso, C. J., "Countertransference Management" 38 (38): 418-422, 2001

32 Hair, J. F., "Cluster analysis. in: Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics" American Psychological Association 147-205, 2000

33 Mallinckrodt, B., "Client attachment to therapist, depth of in-session exploration, and object relation in brief psychotherapy" 42 (42): 85-100, 2005

34 Mohr, J. J., "Client and counselor trainee attachment as predictors of session evaluation and countertransference behavior in first counseling sessions" 52 (52): 298-309, 2005

35 Tracey, T. J., "Changes in counselor response as a function of experience" 35 (35): 119-126, 1998

36 Mikulincer, M., "Boosting attachment security to promote mental health, prosocial values, and inter-group tolerance" 18 (18): 139-156, 2007

37 Pistole, M. C., "Attachment theory, counseling process, and supervision" 23 (23): 457-, 1995

38 Bartholomew, K., "Attachment style among young adults: A test of four category model" 61 (61): 226-244, 1991

39 Kobak, R. R., "Attachment in late adolescence: Working models, affect regulation, and representations of self and others" 59 (59): 135-146, 1988

40 Fraley, R. C., "An item response theory analysis of self-report measure of adult attachment" 78 (78): 350-365, 2000

41 Fraley, R. C., "Adult romantic attachment: Theoretical developments, emerging controversies, and unanswered questions" 4 (4): 132-154, 2000

42 Bowlby, J., "A secure base: Clinical applications of attachment theory" Routledge & Kegan Paul 1988

43 Ackerman, S. J., "A review of therapist characteristics and techniques positively impacting the therapeutic alliance" 23 (23): 1-33, 2003