産業福祉의 槪念定立을 위한 試論

우재현 한국사회사업대학 산업복지연구소 1982 産業福祉 Vol.5 No.-

福祉國家論 : 福祉國家의 社會統制

우재현,김영호 한국사회사업대학 산업복지연구소 1982 産業福祉 Vol.5 No.-

福祉國家에로 향한 工業化와 産業構造變動에 관한 考察

박수현 한국사회사업대학 산업복지연구소 1975 産業福祉 Vol.1 No.-

職員資質向上過程에 關한 硏究

김영호 한국사회사업대학 산업복지연구소 1981 産業福祉 Vol.4 No.-

The purpose of this study is to provide a reference for the practice of staff development through the consideration of each phases of staff development process. The process of staff development may include the seven systematic steps as follows; 1st step: Indentify Needs for Steff Development 2nd step: Specify Objectives 3rd step: Assess Resources and Constraints 4th step: Propose alternative Strategies for Staff Development 5th step: Try-out and Modify (if necessary) 6th step: Implement Staff Development Program 7th step: Evaluate Outcome of the Program The Staff development plan is intended to improve the staff’s competencies, which are the required knowledges, skills and attitudes to perform a given task, in order to meet the self-actualization need of individual staff through the successful job performance. The motivation of staff for the staff development program is the important factor to determine the effectiveness of outcome. To motivate the staff for the staff development some incentives such as clearly laid career respect, additional allowances, additional responsibiliy with authority, ect. are needed. The needs for staff development should be identified on the bases of both the needs of individual and those of organization. The objectives of staff development program should be relevant to the need of staff and organization, possible the integration of needs. By upgrading competencies of staff the organization is able to expect to improve the present performance with success. Staff development should likely be identified as a means of the adult education or the life-lone education for the purpose of increasing the quality of life, i. e. the welfare.

테크노크라시에 關한 序說的 硏究 : 槪念定立을 위한 모델의 設定을 中心으로

이해두 한국사회사업대학 산업복지연구소 1981 産業福祉 Vol.4 No.-

This study is to discuss the interaction between modern society and technology, concentraiting in particular on the forces which control this interaction. The application of scientific knowledge through technology has been seen by most modern societies as fundamental to the advance of civilization, and to the well-being of the members of the society. It has often been suggested that we are faced weth a new technological and scientific priesthood of experts i. e. technocrats, who, by virtue of their specialized knowledge, control the direction and advance of technology, and of society generally. Science and technology are by their nature complex disciplines with a relatively closed membership. The language and methodology is specialist and the preserve of an educated élite of experts. According to J.K. Galbraith, whereas ownership of and control over land was crucial for power in the feudal era, and ownership of and control over capital was crucial for power in early days of capitalism, nowadays the crucial resource is knowledge or information, for this is the factor of production ‘that is the hardest to obtain or hardest to replace.’ In its early days, the ideology of ‘technocracy’ was dominated by religious fervour. The ‘religion’ was that of ‘positivism’ of Auguste Comte. But the ideology implicit in positivism, or at least certain eliments of it, has played a crucial role in the subsequent development of the concept of ‘technocracy.’ Crucial aspects of this ideology are: 1. A belief that all laws of science embody an absolute truth, and that all processes, social, natural, physical, are reducible to laws of science. In the face of this concepts like ‘free will’ and ‘choice’ become meaningless. 2. An emphasis on the diminishing importance of political as compared to technical and scientific processes and a consequent tendency to concentrate on ‘means’ or technique to the exclusion of ‘ends’ or ‘goals’. (This is frequently referred to as the ‘end of ideology’ thesis) 3. A belief, following from point 2 above, in the need for control by a select group of ‘benevolent’ or ‘liberal’ experts or technocrats who understand the laws of science. 4. A belief that all scientific or technical progress is for the good of all mankind that ‘progress’ is in fact synonymous with ‘improvement’. Certain aspects of this ideology are frequently referred to a scientism. Scientism has been called ‘the transformation of positivism into a social philosophy, the basis on which man explains and interprets the nature of society. For the sake of ‘conceptualization’ of technocracy, we present four discrete and differentiated models of it, althongh there are in reality many other possible interpretations of the word which fall between or overlap these models. The writes label these models for convenience of identification: a. ‘Benevolent technocracy’ model; The Saint-Simonian model of benevolent technocracy promoting the interests of all sectors of the community. b. ‘Self-interested élite’ model; A class model of technocracy dominated by the interests of an élite of technocrats. c. ‘Servents of power’ model; A class model of technocracy dominated by the interests of an elite of capitalists. d. ‘Autonomous technology’ model; The ‘uncontrolled’ model of malevolent technology, dominated by autonomous technological momentum. To recapitulate, it would seem, generally, that although technicians and experts exert considerable power and influence within their own sphere of competence through the techniques they employ, the majority of them are not however in positions that enable them to control overall policy decisions, or the ‘ends’ to which these ‘means’ are directed. For some technicians, indeed, it is part of their ‘professional ethic’ that are concerned with ‘means’ rather than ‘ends’; they present their techniques as neutral tools at the service of the policy-maker, who can decide to what ends they should be directed. For other technicians, a belief that science and technique will necessarily preoccupation with ‘means’ on the assumption that the ‘ends’ will look after themselves. Finally, We would emphasize that human beings do have power to control technology, but that this power is not at present evenly distributed between individuals and groups in society. We would rather emphasize the point that within any type of society ‘technocratic power usually results in bolstering up the existing socioeconomic system whatever this may be’.

社會福祉의 展開와 位置의 定立 : Community Care를 中心으로

남상만 한국사회사업대학 산업복지연구소 1975 産業福祉 Vol.1 No.-

우리나라의 輸入資源問題와 그 對應戰略策

도충구 한국사회사업대학 산업복지연구소 1980 産業福祉 Vol.3 No.-

More recently, The problem of The gains from resources issue the versus gains from economic growth can be started more closely in nations. The conception of the import of resources very emphasized the supply side of the development process. An obvious example is the opportunity to import capital goods and materials required for development purpose in the focus of attempts. Accordingly we should seek an answer to the overriding question of whether there is a conflict between the factor of import resources and the economic development through international commercial movement. ―whether the process of development is facilitated or handicapped. Each these problem has accelerated increasing attention in the recent trade mechanism. To extend this analysis to relative countries we must consider how changes in factor supplies of raw materials problems through the long period determinants. Now, Our stand-pointing is as follow: 1. We must composed of reciprocal relationship on each country in accordance with resources conditions. 2. Operationg import is very essence of the long period side on independent economy as poor resources country. 3. Domestic resources must study, develop and utilize on continual political issue. 4. moreover, also essential to relate issue, continual increase of the technical knowledge and accumulation of capital must empharize in large share.

特別利益의 本質에 關한 考察

이인순 한국사회사업대학 산업복지연구소 1980 産業福祉 Vol.3 No.-

Special income is not the income which results from the business activities for the original purpose of an enterprise, but from non-current business activities. It is different in nature from current revenue which is produced repeatedly at all times in selling and financial activities. Therefore, these two need to be dealt differently in accounting. To clarify the nature of special income, I have examined the following: 1) As accounting conditions vary up to the time and the region. I have investigated the differences they result in. 2) As they are used as a variable in the measurement of income, I have investigated them in connection with the definition of income in accounting. 3) As income is the primary object of an enterprise, I have examined it in connection with the objects of accounting concerned with enterprises. 4) I have examined the aspects of the income from sales of fixed assets and profit for the previous period profit adjusted in the pratice of accounting. From the examination of the current principles of accounting in Korea through the above investigations, the following are observed: As the accounting principles of Korea are indefinite in the definition of special income, confusions are expected in practice, and so some kinds of act to supplement them are needed. In advanced countries it is the trend to limit the scope of special income, where-as the accounting principles of Korea have a possibility to enlarge it. And so, it can be concluded that the scope should be adjusted to the change of accouning conditions.

情報「시스템」을 위한 意思決定槪念의 究明

김윤상 한국사회사업대학 산업복지연구소 1980 産業福祉 Vol.3 No.-

The purpose of this study is to summarize the major concepts of decision-making and then to explain the relevance of the theories to design of information systems. The process of decision-making can be described as consisting of three major phases; ① intelligence to search out problems, ② design to analyze problems and generate feasible solutions, ③ choice to select among alternatives and implement the choice. The decision-making systems may be closed with all factors known or open, allowing for new factors to influence the decision. The decision making may be based on outcomes that are known with certainty, outcomes with known probabilities of occurrence(risk), or outcomes with unknown or very uncertain probabilities (uncertainty). The decision response may consist of preprogrammed application of decision rules and procedures or may be a nonprogrammed procedure to look for a solution. The descriptions of decision-making that indicate how decisions should be made are termed normative or prescriptive; the descriptions that explain actual behavior are termed descriptive. A behavioral model of decision making is descriptive. It explains organizational decision making in terms of quasi-resolution of conflict, avoidance of uncertainty, problemistic search, and organizational learning. The orientation of MIS to both information and decision means that the MIS analyst/designer needs to be well versed in dicision theory and decision techniques. The MIS should be designed to provide decision support in the form of various techniques and approaches.

우리나라 水質汚染의 防止技法과 費用

이우홍 한국사회사업대학 산업복지연구소 1975 産業福祉 Vol.1 No.-