RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        A randomized trial comparing limited-excision conisation to Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone (LLETZ) in cervical dysplasia patients

        Theresa Maria Kolben,Lea T Etzel,Florian Bergauer,Ingke Hagemann,Peter Hillemanns,Monika Repper,Andreas M Kaufmann,Karl Sotlar,Thomas Kolben,Hans-Joachim Helms,Julia Gallwas,Sven Mahner,Christian Dann 대한부인종양학회 2019 Journal of Gynecologic Oncology Vol.30 No.3

        Objective: To show noninferiority of a limited-excision (resection of the dysplastic lesion only) vs. classical Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone (LLETZ).Methods: In this prospective, randomized, multicenter trial, women with human papillomavirus (HPV) positive cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 were randomized into two groups (1:1). Primary outcome was the rate of negative HPV tests after 6 months, secondary outcomes included cone size, complete resection rates as well as cytological and histological results after 6 and 12 months. A sample size of 1,000 was calculated to show noninferiority of the limited-excision compared to the LLETZgroup using a noninferiority margin of 5%. Enrollment was stopped after 100 patients due to slow accrual.Results: Patients in the limited-excision group did not show a lower number of negative HPV tests (78% [LLETZ]80% [limited-excision]=−2%; 90% confidence interval=−15%, 12%). The limited-excision resulted in a substantially lower cone size (LLETZ: 1.97 mL vs. limitedexcision: 1.02 mL; p<0.001) but higher numbers of involved margins (LLETZ: 8% vs. limitedexcision: 20%). Although postoperative cytological results slightly differed, histological results were similar in both groups. One limited-excision patient received immediate re-conisation, whereas one patient in each group was scheduled for re-conisation after 6 months. Conclusion: The limited-excision could represent a promising option to reduce the surgical extent of conisations while maintaining oncological safety. The trial was not sufficiently powered to reach statistical significance due to early termination. Nevertheless, the study provides important insights in the feasibility of a limited-excision and could serve as a pilot study for future trials.Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Register Identifier: DRKS00006169

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼