http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
Kazuhide Inage,Sumihisa Orita,Kazuyo Yamauchi,Takane Suzuki,Miyako Suzuki,Yoshihiro Sakuma,Go Kubota,Yasuhiro Oikawa,Takeshi Sainoh,Jun Sato,Kazuki Fujimoto,Yasuhiro Shiga,Koki Abe,Hirohito Kanamoto,M 대한척추외과학회 2016 Asian Spine Journal Vol.10 No.4
Study Design: Experimental animal study. Purpose: We aimed to determine the optimal dose of a single direct injection of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitor, etanercept, by using the rat model of degenerative intervertebral disc from injury. Overview of Literature: The pain-related peptide expression was suppressed in the etanercept (100 μg and 1,000 μg)-administered groups in a dose-dependent manner. Methods: The neurotracer FluoroGold (FG) was applied to the surfaces of L4/5 discs to label their innervating dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons (n=50). Ten rats were included in the nonpunctured disc sham surgery control group, whereas the other 40 were included in the experimental group in which intervertebral discs were punctured with a 23-gauge needle. Saline or etanercept (10 μg, 100 μg, or 1,000 μg) was injected into the punctured discs (n=10 for each treatment). After 14 days of surgery, DRGs from L1 to L6 were harvested, sectioned, and immunostained for calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). The proportion of FG-labeled CGRPimmunoreactive DRG neurons was evaluated in all the groups. Results: There were no significant differences between the puncture+saline group and the puncture+10-μg etanercept group (p >0.05). However, a significant decrease in the percentage of FG and CGRP double-positive cells in FG-positive cells was observed in the etanercept (100 μg and 1,000 μg)-administered groups in a dose-dependent manner (p <0.05). Conclusions: When a low dose of the TNF-α inhibitor (10 μg of etanercept) was directly administered to the rat intervertebral disc in the rat model of degenerative intervertebral disc from injury, no suppressive effect on the pain-related peptide expression was observed. However, when a higher dose of etanercept (100 μg and 1,000 μg) was administered, the pain-related peptide expression was suppressed in a dose-dependent manner.
Kazuhide Inage,Sumihisa Orita,Kazuyo Yamauchi,Takane Suzuki,Miyako Suzuki,Yoshihiro Sakuma,Go Kubota,Yasuhiro Oikawa,Takeshi Sainoh,Jun Sato,Kazuki Fujimoto,Yasuhiro Shiga,Koki Abe,Hirohito Kanamoto,M 대한척추외과학회 2016 Asian Spine Journal Vol.10 No.4
Study Design: Retrospective study. Purpose: To determine whether low-dose tramadol plus non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug combination therapy could prevent the transition of acute low back pain to chronic low back pain. Overview of Literature: Inadequately treated early low back pain transitions to chronic low back pain occur in approximately 30% of affected individuals. The administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is effective for treatment of low back pain in the early stages. However, the treatment of low back pain that is resistant to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is challenging. Methods: Patients who presented with acute low back pain at our hospital were considered for inclusion in this study. After the diagnosis of acute low back pain, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug administration was started. Forty patients with a visual analog scale score of >5 for low back pain 1 month after treatment were finally enrolled. The first 20 patients were included in a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug group, and they continued non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy for 1 month. The next 20 patients were included in a combination group, and they received low-dose tramadol plus non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug combination therapy for 1 month. The incidence of adverse events and the improvement in the visual analog scale score at 2 months after the start of treatment were analyzed. Results: No adverse events were observed in the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug group. In the combination group, administration was discontinued in 2 patients (10%) due to adverse events immediately following the start of tramadol administration. At 2 months, the improvement in the visual analog scale score was greater in the combination group than in the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug group (p <0.001). Conclusions: Low-dose tramadol plus non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug combination therapy might decrease the incidence of adverse events and prevent the transition of acute low back pain to chronic low back pain.
Taigo Inada,Takeo Furuya,Koshiro Kamiya,Mitsutoshi Ota,Satoshi Maki,Takane Suzuki,Kazuhisa Takahashi,Masashi Yamazaki,Masaaki Aramomi,Chikato Mannoji,Masao Koda 대한척추외과학회 2016 Asian Spine Journal Vol.10 No.4
Study Design: Retrospective case series. Purpose: To elucidate the impact of postoperative occiput–C2 (O–C2) angle change on subaxial cervical alignment. Overview of Literature: In the case of occipito–upper cervical fixation surgery, it is recommended that the O–C2 angle should be set larger than the preoperative value postoperatively. Methods: The present study included 17 patients who underwent occipito–upper cervical spine (above C4) posterior fixation surgery for atlantoaxial subluxation of various etiologies. Plain lateral cervical radiographs in a neutral position at standing were obtained and the O–C2 angle and subaxial lordosis angle (the angle between the endplates of the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) and C7 vertebrae) were measured preoperatively and postoperatively soon after surgery and ambulation and at the final follow-up visit. Results: There was a significant negative correlation between the average postoperative alteration of O–C2 angle (DO–C2) and the average postoperative alteration of subaxial lordosis angle (Dsubaxial lordosis angle) (r =–0.47, p =0.03). Conclusions: There was a negative correlation between DO–C2 and Dsubaxial lordosis angles. This suggests that decrease of midto lower-cervical lordosis acts as a compensatory mechanism for lordotic correction between the occiput and C2. In occipito-cervical fusion surgery, care must be taken to avoid excessive O–C2 angle correction because it might induce mid-to-lower cervical compensatory decrease of lordosis.
Masao Koda,Chikato Mannoji,Masazumi Murakami,Tomoaki Kinoshita,Jiro Hirayama,Tomohiro Miyashita,Yawara Eguchi,Masashi Yamazaki,Takane Suzuki,Masaaki Aramomi,Mitsutoshi Ota,Satoshi Maki,Kazuhisa Takaha 대한척추외과학회 2016 Asian Spine Journal Vol.10 No.6
Study Design: Retrospective case-control study. Purpose: To determine whether kissing spine is a risk factor for recurrence of sciatica after lumbar posterior decompression using a spinous process floating approach. Overview of Literature: Kissing spine is defined by apposition and sclerotic change of the facing spinous processes as shown in X-ray images, and is often accompanied by marked disc degeneration and decrement of disc height. If kissing spine significantly contributes to weight bearing and the stability of the lumbar spine, trauma to the spinous process might induce a breakdown of lumbar spine stability after posterior decompression surgery in cases of kissing spine. Methods: The present study included 161 patients who had undergone posterior decompression surgery for lumbar canal stenosis using a spinous process floating approaches. We defined recurrence of sciatica as that resolved after initial surgery and then recurred. Kissing spine was defined as sclerotic change and the apposition of the spinous process in a plain radiogram. Preoperative foraminal stenosis was determined by the decrease of perineural fat intensity detected by parasagittal T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Preoperative percentage slip, segmental range of motion, and segmental scoliosis were analyzed in preoperative radiographs. Univariate analysis followed by stepwise logistic regression analysis determined factors independently associated with recurrence of sciatica. Results: Stepwise logistic regression revealed kissing spine (p =0.024; odds ratio, 3.80) and foraminal stenosis (p <0.01; odds ratio, 17.89) as independent risk factors for the recurrence of sciatica after posterior lumbar spinal decompression with spinous process floating procedures for lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Conclusions: When a patient shows kissing spine and concomitant subclinical foraminal stenosis at the affected level, we should sufficiently discuss the selection of an appropriate surgical procedure.