http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
가치혁신문화에 대한 조직구성원의 인식이 경영성과에 미치는 영향
이금심(Geumsim Lee),황복주(Bokju Hwang),소권섭(Kwonseob So) 한국관리회계학회 2016 관리회계연구 Vol.16 No.3
본 연구는 조직 가치혁신문화가 혁신행동 및 지식공유 그리고 경영성과에 영향을 미치는지 규명하고 그에 따른 지속가능한 기업의 성장과 경쟁적 우위를 선점할 수 있는 방안을 제시하는 데 목적이 있다. 이러한 연구목적을 달성하기 위해 조직에 소속된 구성원을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였고, 총 365부의 설문지가 분석되었다. 가설검정 및 구성개념들의 인과관계를 확인하기 위해 공분산 구조분석을 하였다. 본 연구의 분석결과 조직의 가치혁신문화의 의미있는 업무와 위험감수문화 요인은 혁신행동 및 지식공유에 영향을 미치고 지식공유는 혁신행동에 영향을 미치며, 혁신행동은 경영성과에 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 경영성과를 제고하기 위해 필요한 조직의 가치혁신문화를 혁신행동과 지식공유를 매개변수로 경영성과와 관련시켜 연구하였다는 점에서 의의가 있다. 이에 조직의 경영성과 제고를 위한 조직의 가치혁신문화에 대한 혁신 실천 방안을 제시하였다. The purpose of this study is to investigate the influence relationship between not only innovative behavior and knowledge sharing but also perception of organization’s value innovation culture and business performance. Additionally, this study suggests the sustainable possibilities of business growth and how to gain competitive advantages. We conducted a survey with 365 members of the organization. We set on perception of organization’s value innovation culture as independent variable to improve business performance. We did the covariance structure analysis to confirm the causal relationship of constructs and hypothesis testing. As the result of this study, we found that the meaningful work and risk-taking culture of value innovation culture influenced on the innovative behavior and knowledge sharing and innovative behavior had an effect on business performance. We also analyzed the influence relationship between mediating variable and business performance. This study suggested the practical method for innovative behavior and knowledge sharing.
Chemical Use and Associated Health Concerns in the Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry
Yoon, Chungsik,Kim, Sunju,Park, Donguk,Choi, Younsoon,Jo, Jihoon,Lee, Kwonseob Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute 2020 Safety and health at work Vol.11 No.4
Background: Research on the status of many chemicals used in the semiconductor industry is needed. The purpose of this study was to describe the overall status of chemical use in the semiconductor industry in Korea and to examine it from a health perspective. Methods: Data on the status of chemical use and safety data sheets at 11 of 12 major semiconductor workplaces in Korea were collected. The number of chemical products and chemical constituents, quantities of chemicals, and trade secret ingredients used, as well as the health hazards were examined. Results: On average, 210 chemical products and 135 chemical constituents were used at the surveyed workplaces. Among all chemical products, 33% (range: 16-56%) contained at least one trade secret ingredient. Most of the trade secret ingredients were used in the photolithography process. Several carcinogens, including sulfuric acid, chromic acid, ethylene oxide, crystalline silica, potassium dichromate, and formaldehyde were also used. Only 29% (39 of 135) of the chemical constituents had occupational exposure limits, and more than 60% had no National Fire Protection Association health, safety, and reactivity ratings. Based on the aforementioned results, this study revealed the following. First, many chemical products and constituents are being used in the semiconductor industry and many products contained trade secret ingredients. Second, many products contained significant amounts of carcinogenic, mutagenic, and reproductive toxicant materials. Conclusion: We conclude that protecting workers in the semiconductor industry against harm from chemical substances will be difficult, due to widespread use of trade secret ingredients and a lack of hazard information. The findings of the status of chemical use and the health and safety risks in semiconductor industry will contribute to epidemiological studies, safe workplace, and worker health protection.
환경부의 화학물질관리법, 화학물질등록 및 평가에 관한 법률, 고용노동부의 산업안전보건법의 화학물질 관련 내용 비교
윤충식,함승헌,박지훈,김선주,이상아,이권섭,박동욱,Yoon, Chungsik,Ham, Seunghon,Park, Jihoon,Kim, Sunju,Lee, Sangah,Lee, Kwonseob,Park, Donguk 한국환경보건학회 2014 한국환경보건학회지 Vol.40 No.5
Objectives: The exponential growth of chemicals, an area of high concern in developed countries like the US (i.e., the Gore Initiative) and in the EU (i.e., REACH), as well as recent chemical accidents in Korea, have provoked nationwide concerns and resultant legal enforcement. This study aims to compare the laws of the Ministry of Environment (the Chemical Substances Control Act (CSCA), Act on the Registration and Evaluation, etc. of Chemical Substances (ARECS)) with those of the Ministry of the Employment and Labor (Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA)). Methods: Each law pertaining to the Ministry of Environment and the Ministry of the Employment and Labor was downloaded from the official legal information system (www.law.go.kr). The objectives of each law and the major contents related to chemical management were compared and summarized. Results: The CSCA and the ARECS are focused on the protection of people and the environment, while the OSHA relates to the protection of workers. The right to know of people and workers has been reinforced. The former two laws emphasize prevention, but the OSHA contains both preventive and post-accident measures. The role of the Ministry of Employment was reinforced with the promulgation of the CSCA and ARECS, which contain regulations such as adjacent area impact evaluation, risk control planning, chemical statistical survey and construction and operation of information, provision of risk control plans, response to chemical accidents and registration of chemical substances. Conclusion: We found that the three laws discussed here have several similar clauses designed to protect people and the environment from risks that may be caused by the use of chemicals, even though there are some differences among them in terms of objectives and contents. This review concluded that several clauses that can be regarded as double regulation should be unified in order to minimize the waste of government administrative resources and socio-economic losses.