http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : Jerome Pelletier (검색결과 1 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
Analogical Uses of the First Person Pronoun: A Difficulty in Philosophical Semantics
Jerome Pelletier 서울대학교 인지과학연구소 2004 Journal of Cognitive Science Vol.5 No.2
Analogical counterfactuals such as "If I were you, I would do so and so…" create a puzzle for philosophical semantics. Whereas the `received view` in philosophical semantics has it that the first person pronoun always refers to its utterer, one may wonder whether this is still the case when the first person pronoun is embedded in analogical counterfactuals such as (2) "If I were you, I would stay away from me". I suggest that the intelligibility of (2) lies in the fact that the token of the expression `I` in the consequent of the counterfactual does not refer to its utterer. Should one then conclude, following the `anaphoric theory` that the second occurrence of `I` in (2) does refer to its addressee? For the `anaphoric theory`, `I` in `I would stay away from me` refers anaphorically, thanks to the linguistic context, to the referent of `you` in `If I were you`. On the basis of an analysis of the imaginative project involved in uttering a practical advise in the form of (2), I suggest contra the `anaphoric theory` that the first pronoun `I` in the consequent of (2) behaves as an indexical and that its content is obtained by the application of its character to a pretend context differing from the context of its utterance. According to the so-called `pretence theory`, the first person pronoun in its second occurrence in (2) pretends to refer to a fictional composite of the utterer and the addressee.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
