http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : Ilhan Uysal (검색결과 4 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
Empowering Privacy in the Digital Age: AI Innovations in Healthcare
Ilhan Uysal 한국디지털융합학회 2023 IJICTDC Vol.8 No.1
In today's digital age where health data is increasingly stored, accessed, and shared electronically, ensuring the privacy and security of patient information has become a major concern. The potential risks associated with unauthorized access, data breaches, and privacy violations require innovative approaches to protect sensitive health data. This is where the power of artificial intelligence (AI) comes into play. AI innovations have emerged as a transformative force in healthcare and offer promising solutions to enhance privacy protection. This paper discusses how healthcare organizations can use artificial intelligence (AI) to protect patient privacy while extracting valuable insights from their data. It also expresses how AI techniques such as differential privacy and fused learning can help organizations collaborate, aggregate their data, and train machine learning models securely without compromising patient privacy. It emphasizes the importance of understanding the challenges and potential limitations of privacy-preserving techniques in this context and encourages stakeholders to collaborate on developing industry standards and best practices for privacy protection.
-
Comparison of three different orthodontic wires for bonded lingual retainer fabrication
Baysal, Asli,Uysal, Tancan,Gul, Nisa,Alan, Melike Busra,Ramoglu, Sabri Ilhan The Korean Association Of Orthodontists 2012 대한치과교정학회지 Vol.42 No.1
Objective: We evaluated the detachment force, amount of deformation, fracture mode, and pull-out force of 3 different wires used for bonded lingual retainer fabrication. Methods: We tested 0.0215-inch five-stranded wire (PentaOne, Masel; group I), $0.016{\times}0.022$-inch dead-soft eight-braided wire (Bond-A-Braid, Reliance; group II), and 0.0195-inch dead-soft coaxial wire (Respond, Ormco; group III). To test detachment force, deformation, and fracture mode, we embedded 94 lower incisor teeth in acrylic blocks in pairs. Retainer wires were bonded to the teeth and vertically directed force was applied to the wire. To test pull-out force, wires were embedded in composite that was placed in a hole at the center of an acrylic block. Tensile force was applied along the long axis of the wire. Results: Detachment force and mode of fracture were not different between groups. Deformation was significantly higher in groups II and III than in group I (p < 0.001). Mean pull-out force was significantly higher for group I compared to groups II and III (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Detachment force and fracture mode were similar for all wires, but greater deformations were seen in dead-soft wires. Wire pull-out force was significantly higher for five-stranded coaxial wire than for the other wires tested. Five-stranded coaxial wires are suggested for use in bonded lingual retainers.
-
Comparison of three different orthodontic wires for bonded lingual retainer fabrication
Asli Baysal,Tancan Uysal,Nisa Gul,Melike Busra Alan,Sabri Ilhan Ramoglu 대한치과교정학회 2012 대한치과교정학회지 Vol.42 No.1
Objective: We evaluated the detachment force, amount of deformation, fracture mode, and pull-out force of 3 different wires used for bonded lingual retainer fabrication. Methods: We tested 0.0215-inch five-stranded wire (PentaOne, Masel; group I), 0.016 × 0.022-inch dead-soft eight-braided wire (Bond-ABraid, Reliance; group II), and 0.0195-inch dead-soft coaxial wire (Respond, Ormco; group III). To test detachment force, deformation, and fracture mode, we embedded 94 lower incisor teeth in acrylic blocks in pairs. Retainer wires were bonded to the teeth and vertically directed force was applied to the wire. To test pull-out force, wires were embedded in composite that was placed in a hole at the center of an acrylic block. Tensile force was applied along the long axis of the wire. Results: Detachment force and mode of fracture were not different between groups. Deformation was significantly higher in groups II and III than in group I (p < 0.001). Mean pull-out force was significantly higher for group I compared to groups II and III (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Detachment force and fracture mode were similar for all wires, but greater deformations were seen in dead-soft wires. Wire pull-out force was significantly higher for five-stranded coaxial wire than for the other wires tested. Five-stranded coaxial wires are suggested for use in bonded lingual retainers.
-
Duran, Ayse Ocak,Karaca, Halit,Besiroglu, Mehmet,Bayoglu, Ibrahim Vedat,Menekse, Serkan,Yapici, Heves Surmeli,Yazilitas, Dogan,Bahceci, Aykut,Uysal, Mukremin,Sevinc, Alper,Hacibekiroglu, Ilhan,Aksoy, Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention 2014 Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention Vol.15 No.23
Background: XELOX plus bevacizumab (XELOX-Bev) and FOLFIRI plus Bevacizumab (FOLFIRI - Bev) treatments are an effective strategies patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).The aim of this study was to compare efficacy of first-line XELOX-Bev treatment vs FOLFIRI-Bev treatment for mCRC. Materials and Methods: A total of 409 patients with mCRC who received chemotherapy were included and divided into 2 groups. Group 1 (n=298) received XELOX-Bev and Group 2 (n=111) FOLFIRI-Bev. Comparisons were made in terms of overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival, response rate (RR), and grade 3-4 toxicity. Results: Median follow-up was 11 months in Group 1 and 15 months for Group 2. Complete remission was observed in 29 (9.7%) and 2 (1.8%) patients, partial remission in 139 (46.6%) and 27 (24.5%), stable disease in 88 (29.5%) and 49 (44.1%) and progressive disease in 42 (14.1%) and 33 (30.0%) patients in Group 1 and 2, respectively. Median OS was 25 months (range 2-57 months, 95%CI; 22.2-27.7) for Group 1 and 20 months (range 1-67 months, 95%CI; 16.8-23.1) for Group 2 (p=0.036). Median PFS was 9.6 months (range 2-36 months, 95%CI; 8.8-10.4) for Group 1 and 9 months (range 1-44 months, 95%CI; 7.4-10.5) for Group 2 (p=0.019). Objective RR was 56.4% in Group 1 and 26.1% in Group 2 (p<0.001). Conclusions: First-line XELOX-Bev is more effective with a better response rate, prolongation of median PFS/OS, and a superior safety profile compared with FOLFIRI-Bev.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
