http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
A. Jasik,I. Sankowska,J. Ratajczak,A. Wawro,D. Smoczyński,K. Czuba,M. Wzorek 한국물리학회 2019 Current Applied Physics Vol.19 No.2
In the paper, the comparative analysis of type-II InAs/GaSb SLs deposited on three types of GaSb buffers: homoepitaxial, metamorphic and one grown using the interfacial misfit (IMF) array technique has been presented. The buffer layers as well as superlattices were grown under nominally identical technological conditions. HRXRD investigations proved better crystal quality of the metamorphic material than the IMF-GaSb. FWHMRC were equal to 156 arcsec and 196 arcsec, respectively. The surface roughness of about 1 ML and 4 MLs was obtained using the atomic force microscope for 4.0 μm–metamorphic GaSb and 1.5 μm-IMF-GaSb layers, respectively. The etch pits density for both buffers was similar, 1–2 × 107 cm−2. Superlattice with 500 periods deposited on the homoepitaxial buffer was used as a reference of the best crystal quality. HRTEM images revealed straight InAs/GaSb interfaces with 1 ML thicknesses in this sample. The interfaces in SL deposited on IMFGaSb buffer were undulated and smeared over 3 MLs. The use of the metamorphic buffer resulted in 1–2 ML straight InAs/GaSb interfaces. The main reason for this is the roughness of IMF-GaSb buffer with mounds on the surface. Based on the obtained results we have demonstrated the advantage of metamorphic approach over IMF growth mode in GaSb/GaAs material system. A two times thicker buffer could be the price worth paying for high quality structures, even when working in the production mode.