http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : Hemnishil K. Marella (검색결과 1 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
Hemnishil K. Marella,Nasir Saleem,Claudio Tombazzi 대한소화기내시경학회 2021 Clinical Endoscopy Vol.54 No.2
Background/Aims: The adenoma detection rate (ADR) is used as a quality indicator for screening and surveillance colonoscopy. Thestudy aimed to determine if moderate versus deep sedation affects the outcomes of the ADR and other quality metrics in the veteranpopulation. Methods: A retrospective review of colonoscopies performed at Memphis Veterans Affairs Medical Center over a one-year periodwas conducted. A total of 900 colonoscopy reports were reviewed. After exclusion criteria, a total of 229 index, average-risk screeningcolonoscopies were identified. Data were collected to determine the impact of moderate (benzodiazepine plus opioids) versus deep(propofol) sedation on the ADR, polyp detection rate (PDR), and withdrawal time. Results: Among 229 screening colonoscopies, 103 (44.9%) used moderate sedation while 126 (55%) were done under deep sedation. The ADR and PDR were not significantly different between moderate versus deep sedation at 35.9% vs. 37.3% (p=0.82) and 58.2% vs. 48.4% (p=0.13), respectively. Similarly, there was no significant difference in withdrawal time between moderate and deep sedation(13.4 min vs. 14 min, p=0.56) during screening colonoscopies. Conclusions: In veterans undergoing index, average-risk screening colonoscopies, the quality metrics of the ADR, PDR, andwithdrawal time are not influenced by deep sedation compared with moderate sedation.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
