RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재후보

        Effect of Stretching and Tool-Assisted Friction Massage on Hamstring Flexibility

        Sarah E. Merkel,한경모,Emily H. Wughalter,Jessica W. Chin 한국체육학회 2016 International journal of human movement science Vol.10 No.1

        The purpose of the study was to determine the effects of tool-assisted massage and passive stretching on hamstring flexibility. Twenty-one healthy college baseball players (age = 20.2 ± 1.5 yrs, height = 181.4 ± 5.9 cm, mass = 82.5 ± 8.5 kg) participated in the study. The participants were randomly assigned to 1 of the following 3 groups: passive stretching (PAS, n = 6); passive stretch and tool-assisted friction massage (FUZ, n = 7); or control (CON, n = 8). The interventions took place 6 days a week for 3 weeks, Sunday through Friday, for a period of 18 days on both legs. The PAS group received 3, 30-second repetitions of passive hip flexion with the knee fully extended. The FUZ group received the PAS group stretching treatment plus a 5-minute tool-assisted friction massage, 2 times a week for 6 treatments (2 days rest between treatment days). The participants’ hamstring flexibility was measured employing the passive knee extension test. The baseline knee extension angle (KEA) was measured 1 day prior to the first stretching session day on both legs, and KEA was measured again on the day after the last stretching session to determine outcome difference. At baseline, there were no significant differences in the right leg (RL) between groups (PAS vs. FUZ, p = .957; PAS vs. CON, p = .713; FUZ vs. CON, p = .509) and left leg (LL) for the KEA measurement. Post data indicated a significant increase in hamstring flexibility for the PAS (RL, p = .001; LL = .001) and FUZ group (RL, p = .001; LL, p = .001). However, there were no significant differences in hamstring flexibility between the PAS and FUZ group for either the right or left leg (RL, p = .789; LL, p = 0.590). While passive stretching is an effective method to increase hamstring flexibility, in this sample the use of tool-assisted massage in conjunction with passive stretching did not provide additional hamstring flexibility. This may be due to number of repetitions, duration, or frequency of stretching and application of tool-assisted massage protocol of the treatment.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼