http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : Demetrios Argyriades (검색결과 1 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
Geraldine Fraser-Moleketi,Demetrios Argyriades 연세대학교(미래캠퍼스) 빈곤문제국제개발연구원 2010 地域發展硏究 Vol.19 No.1
Observing the evolution of post-war development theories, may not overlook the catalytic influence of shifting paradigms of State and public service, conflicting views on government, its proper role, objectives and modes of operation, the all-important concepts of power and legitimacy but, in the last analysis, the impact on those theories of sharply contradictory models of Man and Society. Such paradigms and models have, over time, exerted a significant measure of influence on the policies and programmes of the United Nations, the Bretton Woods Institutions and the UNDP. During the period covered by this report, three contradictory models have surfaced and prevailed in quick succession. The earliest underpinned the public-sector driven economic development programmes, which accompanied the process of decolonization and nation building in Asia, Africa and Latin America. This was followed, in the eighties, by a sharply contrasting approach; one that downplayed the role of State and public sector and emphasized the benefits of private enterprise. Both of those models suffered from narrow definitions of the nature, scope and process of development; definitions that precluded proper consideration of non-economic factors and stressed GDP growth over income distribution and the spread of opportunities. The Human Development Index has, since the 1990s, tried to correct the imbalances inherent in this approach. In recent years, especially, the growing stress accorded to democratic governance is changing our perceptions of the nature and role of development.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
