http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : Agnes S. Ku and Horng-luen Wang (검색결과 2 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
Ku, Agnes S.,Wang, Horng-luen 경남대학교 극동문제연구소 2004 ASIAN PERSPECTIVE Vol.28 No.1
During the outbreaks of SARS in 2003, civil societies in Hong Kong and Taiwan came to their own self-rescue in different ways when the governments failed effectively to contain the crises in the early stages. Conventionally, civil society in Hong Kong has been characterized as “pacified” as compared to its more “contentious” counterpart in Taiwan. A similar comparison applied in the SARS crises: Hong Kong society demonstrated a high degree of medical professionalism, civic solidarity, and moral unity, whereas in Taiwan, both health workers and ordinary citizens were highly contentious and demoralized at the early stage of the crisis. Nevertheless, state-society relations also showed some changing patterns of tensions, conflicts, and collaboration as the crises unfolded. Comparing Hong Kong and Taiwan, we show how civil societies, in their interaction with the state, responded to the crises differently in the two places, and we explain how their different responses were mediated through differences in their civic cultures, state-society relations, extent of institutionalized trust, and public health systems.
-
Agnes S. Ku and Horng-luen Wang 경남대학교 극동문제연구소 2004 ASIAN PERSPECTIVE Vol.28 No.1
During the outbreaks of SARS in 2003, civil societies in Hong Kong and Taiwan came to their own self-rescue in different ways when the governments failed effectively to contain the crises in the early stages. Conventionally, civil society in Hong Kong has been characterized as “pacified” as compared to its more “contentious” counterpart in Taiwan. A similar comparison applied in the SARS crises: Hong Kong society demonstrated a high degree of medical professionalism, civic solidarity, and moral unity, whereas in Taiwan, both health workers and ordinary citizens were highly contentious and demoralized at the early stage of the crisis. Nevertheless, state-society relations also showed some changing patterns of tensions, conflicts, and collaboration as the crises unfolded. Comparing Hong Kong and Taiwan, we show how civil societies, in their interaction with the state, responded to the crises differently in the two places, and we explain how their different responses were mediated through differences in their civic cultures, state-society relations, extent of institutionalized trust, and public health systems.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
