http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : Abulhamd Alaa (검색결과 1 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
Mosaad Mohamed,Khozamy Ali,Barakat Ahmed Samir,Emran Ihab,Elmeligy Yasser,Abulhamd Alaa 대한척추외과학회 2023 Asian Spine Journal Vol.17 No.5
Study Design: randomized, prospective, and level I clinical study.Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes and radiological findings of revision discectomy alone versus revision discectomy with fusion as surgical treatment for recurrent lumbar disc herniation (RDH).Overview of Literature: RDH is a common complication following a primary discectomy. The optimal surgical procedure for RDH is still debated.Methods: Sixty patients with RDH were randomly divided into two equal groups: the first group underwent revision discectomy alone and the second underwent revision discectomy with fusion. The primary outcomes evaluated were Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for low back and limb pains, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), disc height indexes, foraminal height index, and disc height subsidence. Secondary outcomes included operative time, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, and complications.Results: Revision discectomy with fusion showed superior pain relief and improved functional outcomes, including better VAS scores for both back and leg pain and ODI at 24-month follow-up. Additionally, it restored the stability of the spine better with lower disc height subsidence without significant complications. However, these advantages came at the cost of increased blood loss and longer operative time and hospital stays.Conclusions: Revision discectomy with fusion is recommended for RDH; however, the choice of the procedure should be made caseby- case basis, considering many factors related to the patient and surgical facilities.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
