http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 펑 티엔 (검색결과 2 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
Yuan-Yuan HU,이양기,펑 티엔 한국무역연구원 2022 무역연구 Vol.18 No.4
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the causes of Sino-U.S. solar PV trade disputes by adopting research, comparative research, and case study. It also proposes relevant resolutions over Sino-U.S. solar trade conflicts and the implications for low-carbon energy transition. Design/Methodology/Approach Based on green trade protectionism and comparative advantage theory, this paper combines Chinese solar products export flows to the U.S. with cases of solar trade disputes from 2011 to 2022 to analyze the causes of Sino-U.S. solar trade conflict. Thus, from the perspective of international trade law, WTO reform on the relevant renewable energy agreements, international carbon border tax regime, and a bilateral clean agreement or EGA negotiations, it purposes the resolution of Sino-U.S. solar trade conflict. Findings This paper studies factors leading to the Sino-U.S. solar trade conflict, which is mainly a bilateral trade imbalance, the game of interest groups within the US, non-standard support policies for Chinese solar energy industry, and geopolitical and national green energy security. There is no doubt that trade disputes had had a larger negative impact on Sino-U.S. solar trade flows from 2011 to 2019. Meanwhile, the solar PV trade policies of the US affected the global supply chain of solar PV products, thus hindering the progress of low-carbon energy transition. Research Implications In the management of this paper, this study has important practical significance for the healthy and sustainable development of solar PV trade and achieving low-carbon energy transition for both countries. It can also provide references to solar energy trade disputes among other countries in a broader sense, and propose relevant recommendations for South Korea’s solar energy.
-
안태건(Tae-Kun Ahn),김성룡(Sung-Ryong Kim),티엔 펑(Peng Tian) 한국국제상학회 2020 國際商學 Vol.35 No.2
2015년 개정 영국 보험법에서 기존의 피보험자 고지의무가 공정제공의무로 개정되었다. 공정제공의무는 고지의무 위반에 정도에 따른 피보험자의 구제를 다양하게 규정하고 보험자의 추가질의의무를 규정하였다. 이를 통해 공정제공의무는 보험자와 피보험자의 공동 의무가 되었다. 본 연구는 이러한 공정제공의무의 해상보험실무 적용에 대비해서, 한국과 중국의 관련된 판례를 분석하였다. 중국 보험법은 질문고지제도를 적용하고 있어서 판례에서 법원이 보험자의 질문에 포함되지 않은 사안에 대한 피보험자의 고지의무가 없다고 보고 있다. 한국 상법은 보험자의 서면 질문 사항을 고지의무의 중요한 사항으로 보고 있다. 하지만 한국의 해상보험 실무는 영국의 법과 관습을 준거법으로 하는 준거법 조항에 의해서 종속되어 있다. 따라서 개정 보험법 적용의 공정제공의무와 추가질의제도를 수용하게 될 것으로 판단된다. 영국 보험법의 개정으로 기존의 해상보험 실무 관행과는 다른 기준이 적용되게 되었고 이에 대한 대비가 요구되어 진다. Purpose : Under the UK Insurance Act of 2015, the insured s Duty of disclosure was revised as the duty of fair presentation. The duty of fair presentation provided for remedies according to the degree of violation of the insured. In addition, the Insurer’s Further Inquiries were newly defined. Through this, the duty of fair presentation is provided to both the insured and the insured. Research design, data, methodology : The purpose of this study was to prepare for the application of the duty of fair presentation to maritime insurance practices. Therefore, in this paper, the related precedents of Korea and China were analyzed. Results : China s insurance law applies a questionnaire. Chinese courts have admitted to defaulting on insureds on matters not covered by the insurer s question. The Korean Commercial Code stipulates the content of written questions from insurers as important matters. However, Korea s maritime insurance practice is subject to the provisions of the UK Marine Insurance Governing Law. Conclusions : Therefore, it is expected that Korea s maritime insurance practice will accept the duty of fair presentation and the Insurer’s Further Inquiries. Insurers and insureds are required to prepare for the new maritime insurance law.
KCI
스콜라연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
