DFSS 기법에 의한 운전자 체형을 고려한 인간공학적 차량설계의 연구

최태현(Taehyun Choi),서상열(Sangyeol Seo),심준엽(Junyoub Shim),정원석(Wonsuk Jung) 한국자동차공학회 2011 한국자동차공학회 학술대회 및 전시회 Vol.2011 No.11

The aim of this study is to suggest ergonomic vehicle design method through optimization of driver’s space about various driver body types (tall, middle, short). Recently, many drivers consistently demand ergonomic factors as well as driving performance when they choose their vehicle. So, there have been a lot of efforts to improve habitability and comfortability through optimizing vehicle interior in advanced design stage. The procedure of this study is as follows. (1)VOC: Driver’s needs of vehicle interior system are collected to select the factors which determine driving posture. (2)QFD: The VOC is converted to engineering words to optimize driving posture in QFD stage. (3)Pugh: The pugh matrix is used to determine optimal concept based on the priority about vehicle interior items. (4)Robust Design: The robust design method is used to select the most compromised group of design factors to minimize discomfort level that is simulated by RAMSIS. And vehicle interior items are optimized to satisfy various body types in this process. The result of optimization from robust design satisfy DFSS target except extremely tall body type (German man 95percentile). It is reasonable to use DFSS in package design stage for ergonomic vehicle. The results of the vehicle design considering driver’s body types can help to determine composition of vehicle interior systems and develop new vehicle.

국가의 긴급한 상황하에서의 인권보호의무의 일탈(Derogation)

최태현(Choi, TaeHyun) 한양법학회 2012 漢陽法學 Vol.23 No.1

In case of State’s emergency situation, the State may, first of all, seek ‘limitations’ of rights according to the permitted conditions under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights(the ICCPR); and thereafter when such limitations are not considered enough, ‘derogation’ measures will be sought. However, most of derogation measures which are taken under the public emergency situation cause a critical obstacle to the protection of its people’s human rights. Until now, evidently, most States that have taken the derogation measures under article 4 of the ICCPR, have been criticized of not entirely fulfilling all the requirements. Today, more than ever, is a time when international rule of law is more emphasized. It is not an exception to say when a public emergency situation has occurred. The validity of derogation measures is subject to the fulfillment of several requirements set by the ICCPR. Such requirements are namely the severeness of the situation, proclamation of public emergency and the notification to other State parties, adherence to the principle of legality, principle of necessity, principle of proportionality and principle of nondiscrimination, consistency with other obligations under international law, and non-derogability of certain specific rights recognized as in the ICCPR and the Human Rights Committee(the HRC). As such, the ICCPR follows the concept that the derogation measures are not permitting the state of legal vacuum. The derogation measures taken in case of public emergency should be strictly limited to the bare minimum necessary to achieve the goal of merely overcoming the emergency situation. Once the threat to the life of a nation is ended, should the State-party immediately comply with the original obligations under the ICCPR to protect its people’s human rights. Moreover, nowadays, the scope of derogation measures is becoming narrowed down even under emergency situation. It must be taken into consideration that the HRC, especially, through interpretation of the relevant provisions of the ICCPR, is expanding the range of non-derogable human rights. Recently there is also a strong tendency to set reasonable limit to the emergency power of State-parties. The range of derogation which is permitted in case of public emergency will be concretely determined in the midst of strained relations between the protection of individual human rights and freedoms and the protection of the interest in the preservation of national life. In any case, derogation measures should be in the ways of enhancing or promoting the human rights of its people within the framework of rule of law.

2020년 제12회 국제법 모의재판 경연대회 문제 해설

최태현(Choi Taehyun) 대한국제법학회 2020 國際法學會論叢 Vol.65 No.4

지구궤도의 군사적 이용에 관한 국제법적 평가와 전망

최태현(Choi, TaeHyun) 한양법학회 2010 漢陽法學 Vol.29 No.-

On August 19, 2009, the Republic of Korea launched Naro Rocket (or KSLV-1: Korea Space Launch Vehicle-1) which was developed by Korean technology, but unfortunately failed to settle in the earth orbit. Regarding the technology for launching and developing the first Korean satellite KITSAT-1, it is possible to say there have been considerable advances on space technologies in Korea. Nowadays, Korea is managing several satellites in the earth orbit, and doing its own best to be one of outer-space developing countries in the international community. In this context, the time is coming to analyze international space law and practice relating to managing satellites in the earth orbit in full detail among law scholars and experts in Korea. Concerning militarization issues in outer space, it became one of the controversial issues in international space law field since the U.S. government declared the Strategic Defense Initiative in 1983, so-called Excalibur project, which mainly aimed to develope anti-ICBM system in low earth orbit. Recently, Bush administration also declared National Space Policy(NSP), which regarded operating space objects in outer space and developing outer space as its own national interest. The NSP contained military use of outer space to protect the U.S. national interest and security. Furthermore, the fact that North Korea recently launched the satellite named Kwang Myung Sung 2 and the news about the plan to develop ICBM by North Korea within 10 years surely show that the militarization of outer space issue is not theoretical or imaginary one anymore. In this regard, among scholars and experts in Korea it is necessary to look into the various legal issues of militarization in outer space, particularly in low earth orbit. This article mainly dealt with the current legal regime established under “the 1967 Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies” (hereinafter referred to as “the Outer Space Treaty”) from the standpoint of public international law. Through analysis on such a legal regime and the interpretation of the relevant provisions in various international treaties and documents, this article gave the answers to the following three questions. (i) What is the attitude of the Outer Space Treaty on militarization of outer space, in particular toward a problem of developing and deploying the conventional weapons? (ii) Whether a State could develop and deploy the conventional weapons in the earth orbit for the purpose of exercising the right of self-defense under international law or not? And finally (iii) Whether the relevant provisions of the UN Charter might be the legal ground to deploy conventional weapons in the earth orbit or not?

ANOVA분석과 Ray tracing을 이용한 cluster reflection 분석

이영길(Younggil. Lee),최태현(Taehyun, Choi),정원석(Wonsuk, Jung) 한국자동차공학회 2018 한국자동차공학회 학술대회 및 전시회 Vol.2018 No.11