http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
조수미(Cho, Soo-Mi),신형덕(Shin, Hyung-Deok) 한국산학기술학회 2014 한국산학기술학회논문지 Vol.15 No.8
본 연구는 문화복지환경이 지역별 자살률에 미치는 영향을 실증적으로 분석하였다. 이를 위해 문화복지환경을 문화 시설과 도시공원으로 구분하였고, 문화시설로서 공연시설, 전시시설, 도서시설의 개수를, 도시공원으로서 도시공원면적을 수 집했다. 또한 전국 지방자치단체 143개의 시, 구를 중심으로 2011년 통계청 자료 등 4개 기관의 자료를 회귀분석을 통하여 분석하였다. 분석결과 공연시설과 도시공원은 통계적으로 유의하게 자살률을 감소시키며 전시시설과 도서시설은 영향을 미 치지 않는 것을 발견했다. 이는 공연시설과 도시공원과 같은 활동적인 요소가 우울 및 스트레스 해소에 영향을 주었기 때문 인 것으로 해석된다. 본 연구는 우리나라의 심각한 문제인 자살률을 낮추는 효과적인 방안으로서 문화복지환경의 가치 및 효과를 재조명하는 것에 그 의의가 있다. This study examined the effects of cultural facilities and city parts on the regional suicide rates in Korea. Data of theaters, exhibition facilities, libraries and city parts was collected in 143 local areas governments. The number of theaters and the size of city parts had a significant effect on decreasing the regional suicide rates in the areas, and the number of exhibition facilities had partial impacts. This result suggests that the dynamic components of a culture and arts environments may work more effectively to relieve depression and stress and decrease the suicide rates. This study suggests that the cultural welfare environments can be found to solve the problem of the high suicide rates in Korea.
유현정(Hyun Jung Yoo),조수미(Soo Mi Cho),임아름(Ah Reum Lim),최지영(Ji Young Choi) 충북대학교 생활과학연구소 2009 생활과학연구논총 Vol.13 No.1
Now, the purchasing power of university students is bigger than before. And some of them use consumption to express themselves and prefer famous brand products, and they are interested in their appearance. This study tries to find university students' value system related to consumption and the meaning of consumption to them by surveying their perception of luxuries and necessities. For this study, a survey of university students in Cheongju was conducted between August 14 and August 31 2008 and 200 responses were used for analysis. The findings of this study are as follows; First, university students divide luxuries and necessities based on price and brand rather than product type. For example, low priced or free cell phones are considered necessities while expensive ones are considered luxuries. Second, many of them agreed that the criterion of necessity is "a thing that you can't do without in everyday life" and the criterion of luxury is "a thing that is behind your means." In addition, other product categories were 'unnecessary products' and 'unclassified products'. Third, factors affecting the criteria that divide luxuries and necessities included peer group's practices and rules, brands the peer group prefers, advertisements, and perception of right consumption.