http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
이유봉(Lee Eu Bong),이희정(토론자) 강원대학교 비교법학연구소 2009 환경법과 정책 Vol.3 No.-
??Nowadays, it is globally agreed that the phenomenonof global warming is so serious to be disregarded, which is mainly resulted from the human industrial activities other than just a natural function. This recognition led to the international efforts for common legal frameworks such as UNCFF and Kyoto protocol (1997) so as to alleviate the recently fast-growing global warming phenomenon. Even though the global society agrees to reduce GHG emission, there have been severe controversies on how to allocate obligations to reduce them. So, this article tried to speculate how to allocate GHG emission burdens from the perspective of justice. Although there are diverse conceptions on justice, this article focused on rather traditional distinctions, the corrective justice and the distributive justice, besides the environmental justice. After reviewing those conceptions of justice, this writing tried to apply them to the global warming context. Moreover, the perspective of environmental justice in the global warming context requires the phenomenal speculation both from the historical view and the futuristic view in terms of GHG emission. Based on this background, finally, this article applied the perspective of justice to the emission trading scheme, and analyzed the allocation models on emission permits and the legal approaches on them.