http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
이희자 배화여자대학 1998 培花論叢 Vol.16-17 No.-
To manage the work behavior of employees is essential for creating effective organizations. Work behavior includes several different kinds of employee behavior, and may be classified into in-role behavior and extra-role behavior. It is commonly accepted in the management literature that organizations need employees who are willing to exceed their formal job requirements. This kind of work behavior goes beyond traditional job performance and is necessary for long-term organizational effectiveness. In the last decade, many terms have been used to describe such behavior including organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) (Graham, 1991; Organ, 1988, 1990; Schnake, 1991), prosocial organizational behavior (Brief & Motowidlo, 1986; ), extra-role behavior (Van Dyne & Cummings, 1990; Werner, 1994), and organizational spontaneity (George & Brief, 1992). Nearly three decades ago, Katz (1964) identified three basic types of behavior essential for a functioning organization: attracting and holding people in the system, dependable role performance; and innovative and spontaneous behavior. Concerning this third category, Katz noted, "An organization which depends solely upon its blueprints of prescribed behavior is a very fragile social system"(p.132). Roethlisberger and Dickson (1964) noted that cooperation refers to something other than productivity. Productivity is regarded as a function of the formal organization (the authority structure, role specification, technology) and the "logic of facts". Cooperation, on the other hand, refers to acts that serve more of a maintenance purpose, to "maintain internal equilibrium." Cooperation thus includes day-to-day spontaneous prosocial gestures of individual accommodation to the work needs of others (e.g., co-workers, supervisor, clients in other departments (Smith et al., (1983) p.653). Every factory, office, or bureau depends daily on a myriad of acts of cooperation, helpfulness, suggestions, gestures of goodwill, altruism and other forms of organizational citizenship behavior. Substantively, citizenship behaviors are important because they lubricate the social machinery of the organization. They provide the flexibility needed to work through many unforeseen contingencies; they enable participants to cope with the otherwise awesome condition of inter-dependence with each other. Recently organizational citizenship behavior has received a great deal of research attention. Despite the growing acceptance of the OCB construct, however, some researchers have raised questions about how OCB is theoretically defined and measured (George & Brief, 1993; Graham, 1988). The Purpose of this study is to examine the construct of OCB by reviewing the theoretical and empirical literature. The contents of the study is to review the concept of organizational citizenship behavior, to compare with similar constructs, to investigate the trends of OCB and predictors of OCB.
이희자(Lee Hui ja),우재숙(Woo Jae suk) 한국사전학회 2006 한국사전학 Vol.- No.7
The purpose of this study was to make a comparative analysis of existing dictionaries to find out what problems they faced in terms of related vocabularies, part of microstructure. And it's also meant to make a definition of a 'related word' to provide accurate information on the mean relations of entries, and the types of related words were classified. There were mixed pieces of information on 〈reference words〉 and 〈related words〉 in dictionaries about not only mean relation but grammatical and other relations. So they lacked system and made it difficult to grasp precise mean relation. In this study, a 'related word' was understood as a word that has a hierarchical, partial or complete inclusion relation with an original word, or that has a coordinate relation to an original word within the same category. And I made a definition of inclusion relation and coordinate relation, and classified 'related words' of those relations into subcategories on that base. As for inclusion relation, there were three types of related words that respectively signify hierarchical, partial and complete relations, and concerning coordinate relation, there were two types of related words that respectively represent discriminating and non- discriminating relations.
이희자(Lee Hee-Ja),유현경(Yoo Hyunkyung),김한샘(Kim Hansaem),천미애(Cheon Mi-Ae) 한국사전학회 2007 한국사전학 Vol.- No.9
The purpose of this paper is to describe a plan for compiling a new dictionary of Korean idiomatic expressions. The research focuses on an productive dictionary for learners (Korean learners as native speakers and L2 learners). The entries include idioms and some collocations. The meaning of idiomatic expressions can be described in two ways: If they have a equivalent word with the same meaning, we can suggest just the word, otherwise, a common description is given. In this dictionary, case frame and argument of verbal expressions are described in detail. Additionally, usage information such as pragmatic features and grammatical restrictions are one of the most important properties of this dictionary.